Tolkien we hardly knew thee:(

Tosho · Post by **Tosho** » 2003-09-02 09:26pm

today thirty years ago September 2, 1973 John Ronald Reul Tolkien passed away

LordShaithis · Post by **LordShaithis** » 2003-09-02 09:36pm

Perhaps his carcass will rise from the dead to strangle Gygax.

Shrykull · Post by **Shrykull** » 2003-09-02 09:46pm

Tosho wrote:today thirty years ago September 2, 1973 John Ronald Reul Tolkien passed away

I Will Not Quote Pics

it says 71 on the stone not 73

Mark S · Post by **Mark S** » 2003-09-02 10:35pm

Shrykull wrote:it says 71 on the stone not 73

Maybe that's Edith.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2003-09-02 10:37pm

Yes. Edith died in 71, while Tolkien died in 73.

Anarchist Bunny · Post by **Anarchist Bunny** » 2003-09-02 10:38pm

71?!?!?! Douglas Adams died too young.

Post by **Gandalf** » 2003-09-02 11:28pm

Earlier this year would have been his eleventy first birthday too.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2003-09-03 10:30am

GrandAdmiralPrawn wrote:Perhaps his carcass will rise from the dead to strangle Gygax.

I'd rather like to see him strangle Terry Goodkind.

And, for that matter, Edgar Rice Burrough's carcass do something really nasty to John Norman.

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2003-09-03 10:53am

anarchistbunny wrote:71?!?!?! Douglas Adams died too young.

That much is obvious as I finally get around to reading The Salmon Of Doubt.

I wonder if Tolkien would approve of the latest incarnation of his famous fantasy tale.

Perinquus · Post by **Perinquus** » 2003-09-03 11:19am

Admiral Valdemar wrote:
anarchistbunny wrote:71?!?!?! Douglas Adams died too young.
That much is obvious as I finally get around to reading The Salmon Of Doubt.

I wonder if Tolkien would approve of the latest incarnation of his famous fantasy tale.

I suspect Tolkien would not have approved of the emasculation of King Theoden, and the transformation of the noble and strong-willed Faramir into just two more weak-willed men. The whole point was to show that though men might be weaker and more corruptible than elves, there were yet some truly noble ones among them, who were fit to stand beside the greatest elven heroes, and thus that men could be truly worthy heirs of Middle Earth. That's why it really pissed me off that Faramir became just another warrior greedy for the Ring. I can't for the life of me see why Peter Jackson made that change. It certainly doesn't improve the story any.

Vendetta · Post by **Vendetta** » 2003-09-03 01:06pm

Tolkien commented when the first radio adaptation of The Hobbit was made that his work was "eminently unsuitable" for adaptation.

As for the movie, I can hear him whirling in his grave from here,

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2003-09-04 09:59am

Vendetta wrote:Tolkien commented when the first radio adaptation of The Hobbit was made that his work was "eminently unsuitable" for adaptation.

As for the movie, I can hear him whirling in his grave from here,

That's probably just because of all the hacks ripping him off.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Tolkien we hardly knew thee:(

Tolkien we hardly knew thee:(

Re: Tolkien we hardly knew thee:(

Re: Tolkien we hardly knew thee:(