Subjective reality

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
SWPIGWANG
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1693
Joined: 2002-09-24 05:00pm
Location: Commence Primary Ignorance

Subjective reality

Post by SWPIGWANG »

n00bie autoflame shield up, ignore annoying old timer armor activate.

Well, when you can't beat a oppenent to a pulp, find people that can. :)

I've been debating for a while with lesser than people at this board people and they seem to all love the idea of subjective reality. They all claim there is no objective reality and what matters is what they think.

While it is true that we can only know what we can observe, taking a personal view frame and consider it is "reality" in my opinion is wrong. The primary problem is that reality is considered as truth and truth can not be contridictory therefore it is impossible to have subjective reality that disagree, only a whole reality percieved differently among people.


And there is the because it is subjective it doesn't exist arguements. While no one is stupid enough to apply to "reality" many have argue for the non-existance of morality because it is a social construct. What the F*** is that? It might be a social construct (<--I don't agree) but it exists for god sakes.
User avatar
salm
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 10296
Joined: 2002-09-09 08:25pm

Post by salm »

of course there´s one objective reality. the point is: "does anybody give a shit?"

if something happens in a certain way A but all the observers see it in a way B or C the way A the, way it originally happened, isn´t important anymore.

objective reality exists but who cares?
User avatar
Cpt_Frank
Official SD.Net Evil Warsie Asshole
Posts: 3652
Joined: 2002-07-03 03:05am
Location: the black void
Contact:

Post by Cpt_Frank »

Btw from a philosophical point of view no human being would ever be able to actually grasp the objective reality since all of our points of view are always clouded by our own subjectivity (which in turn defines that what we are cause if we were purely objective we would be lacking our experiences, feelings etc ie all that makes us human).
Image
Supermod
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

Ah crap, philosophical overload, brain overheating.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Subjective reality

Post by Darth Wong »

SWPIGWANG wrote:n00bie autoflame shield up, ignore annoying old timer armor activate.

Well, when you can't beat a oppenent to a pulp, find people that can. :)

I've been debating for a while with lesser than people at this board people and they seem to all love the idea of subjective reality. They all claim there is no objective reality and what matters is what they think.
The term for that mentality is "solipsism": an intellectually bankrupt exercise, in which they eliminate anything which is objective so that it will always be impossible for them to be wrong. Very convenient, particularly for people who aren't too bright, and are hence often wrong.
While it is true that we can only know what we can observe, taking a personal view frame and consider it is "reality" in my opinion is wrong. The primary problem is that reality is considered as truth and truth can not be contridictory therefore it is impossible to have subjective reality that disagree, only a whole reality percieved differently among people.
Subjective reality can be analyzed. However, it only produces subjective conclusions, which means that any conclusions or ideas generated from this mindset are of value only to the person who generated them. He cannot expect or demand that you pay the slightest attention to them or assign them any validity whatsoever.
And there is the because it is subjective it doesn't exist arguements. While no one is stupid enough to apply to "reality" many have argue for the non-existance of morality because it is a social construct. What the F*** is that? It might be a social construct (<--I don't agree) but it exists for god sakes.
Laws are social constructs. They obviously exist. Governments are social constructs. They clearly exist. Morality is also a social construct. It exists. It can even be based on objective reality, in the sense that a valid system of morality does not base any of its judgements on non-objective data (ie- wishes of imaginary deities, etc).
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
EmperorChrostas the Cruel
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 1710
Joined: 2002-07-09 10:23pm
Location: N-space MWG AQ Sol3 USA CA SV

Post by EmperorChrostas the Cruel »

Objective reality is the coffee table you bash your shin into, at 3:00am, when you answer the phone in the dark.
Hmmmmmm.

"It is happening now, It has happened before, It will surely happen again."
Oldest member of SD.net, not most mature.
Brotherhood of the Monkey
User avatar
XPViking
Jedi Knight
Posts: 733
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:48pm
Location: Back in Canada

Post by XPViking »

Crue,

Or stepping on a toy when it's dark and falling on your butt.

XPViking
8)
If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? We might if they screamed all the time for no good reason.
User avatar
salm
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 10296
Joined: 2002-09-09 08:25pm

Post by salm »

there´s a discworld novel called "the truth" on this. very funny and interesting.
Post Reply