The New Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Kuja wrote:
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Any YV ships over 2 km?
The Legacy of Torment is said to be the size of a SSD.

The Worldship is 10k in diameter.
That's the average size. One was 120 km in diameter.
Kuja wrote:No figures are given for any of the others. (Golly, why would we put figures ina Guide to Vehicles and Vessels? :roll: )
The NJO sourcebook places the YV battleship at 2.2 kilometers.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

YT300000 wrote:
consequences wrote:Defender class Star Destroyer, 1.2 km NR

Endurance class Fleet Carrier, 1.2km NR

Star Destroyer 'Guardian' Identified as a 'Super Star Destroyer', length unknown, NR, from Destiny's Way

The Hapan carriers first shown at the end of Dark Journey are almost certainly greater than 1 km, precise length unknown
So, that book didn't have Nemesis class SDs, did it? (don't remember which book they were from, only website I can find on it is: http://njoproject.skywalkeronline.net/n ... esis.shtml)
:roll:

They say at the website they made it up for Christ's sake.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Post by FTeik »

Ender wrote:
FTeik wrote:The structure Jaina and Kyp destroyed was a shipwomb, not a worldship.
Negatiive, that interpratation was a fuckup by others, Nem Yim specifically says they targeted and destroyed a worldship. the shipwomb is the remnants of the planet, not a structure itself.
I would think the shipwomb to be a much more solid structure, than the widespread debris of a destroyed planet.
As for the vessels over 1km:

Defender-Class-SD (actually Nebula-Class-SD): 1,040 meter

Endurance-Class-Carrier: 1,040 meter (based on the same hull as Nebula)

Republic-Class-Cruiser (not to confuse with the Republic-Class-SD): 1,000 meter
Source for the size? Because the weapons loadout for the Republic SD is large enough that making it a cruiser would be correct.[/quote]

Excuse me? The stats for the Republic-class Star Destroyer

Craft: Rendeli Star Drive Republic-class Star Destroyer
Type: Star Destroyer
Scale: Capital Ship
Length: 1,250 metres
Crew: 8,168, gunners: 260, skeleton: 2,917/+10
Passengers: 3,200 (troops)
Cargo Capacity: 11,000 metric tons
Consumables: 2 years
Cost: not available for sale
Hyperdrive Rating: 2
Hyperdrive Backup: 10
Nav Computer: yes
Maneuverability: 1D
Speed: 6
Hull: 6D
Shields: 3D
Sensors: Passive: 50/1D Scan: 100/3D Search: 200/4D Focus: 6/4D+2
Weapons: 40 Heavy Turbolaser Batteries Fire arc: 20 front, 10 left, 10 right, Damage:8D, Crew: 2 40 Heavy Turbolaser Cannons Fire Arc: 10 front, 10 left, 10 right, 10 back, Damage: 6D, Crew: 2 20 Ion Cannons Fire Arc: 5 front, 5 left, 5right, 5 back, Damage:5D, Crew: 3 10 Tractor Beam Projectors Fire Arc: 4 front, 2 left, 2 right, 2 back, Damage: 6D, Crew: 4
Starfighters: 6 squadrons (two Republic Wings)
Support Carft: none

The Republic-class Star Destroyer is Walex Blissex's follow-up design to his classic Victory Star Destroyer. One of the strongest ships in the New Republic. Two Republic Star Destroyers can be produced for the cost of one Imperial Star Destroyer. It is also considerably more powerful than the Imperial I by 20% and has only one fifth the crew size. In addition to its massive armament, the Republic Star Destroyer carries two Republic Wings of starfighters. It can also carry an entire ground regiment.

BLABLABLA. That is the Republic-Class-Star Destroyer.

About the Republic-Class-CRUISER we only know, that it is 1,000 meters long (interview with WJW, the ship is supposed to be an easily mass-produced vessel by KDY)
KDY-warship of unknown class mentioned in "Star by Star": 1,000 meter, possibly Republic-Class (although that name first appeard in DW)
Name really first appeared back in the black Fleet Crisis[/quote]

For the STAR DESTROYER, not the CRUISER.

Did i wrote NOT TO CONFUSE WITH THE REPUBLIC-CLASS-SD just for fun or what?
Mediator-Class-Battlecruiser: lenght unknown
If cruisers can be in the range of 3km and battleships as small as 6 km, I'd say 4km would be a safe guess for now.[/quote]

Just that the supposed-to-be-more-powerful Viscount-Stardefender can just challenge an ISD.
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.

"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

FTeik wrote:Just that the supposed-to-be-more-powerful Viscount-Stardefender can just challenge an ISD.
Source?

MC-80Bs and MC-90s have had incredible showings against Executor-class ships, remember. Don't make blanket statements.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Post by FTeik »

And you yourself went to some lenghts to explain the poor performance of the Executors in the EU in another thread, if memory serves correct (an EU, that views them as 8km ships and even then the only poor performer would be the Lusankya, if you ask me).

The quote about the Viscount:
"The Mon Calamari have also produced the much larger Viscount-class Star Defender battleships, which can engage Imperial Star Destroyers. At the other end of the spectrum are small fast Mon Cal light cruisers. Light cruisers such as the Poesy make quick strikes against larger battleships or starfighter squadrons using 14 turbolasers, 18 ion cannons, and 6 heavy tractor beams."
~The New Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels, page 91.

Seems that even 20 years after the OT the ISD is some kind of benchmark.
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.

"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

It says that it can engage Star Destroyers. That doesnt mean its equal to (it gives no indication of whether it just matches it or exceeds it, actually.)
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

It's ludicrous to assume the Viscount can only 'just' win out over an Imperator II, considering than an MC90 is considered superior to the ISD design and MC80Bs do quite well against them also.

Even considering the poor showing of the EU-described SSDs, the MC90s and MC80Bs have decent showings at any rate, and those SSDs were described at more powerful than ISDs.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

The poor showings of the Executors either require special circumstances for the Iron Fist and the Knight Hammer both, that all Executors suffer some weakness, or that the MC80B and MC90s are more powerful (and as I believe, larger) than previously thought.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

phongn wrote:It's ludicrous to assume the Viscount can only 'just' win out over an Imperator II, considering than an MC90 is considered superior to the ISD design and MC80Bs do quite well against them also.
The New-class ships were able to as well, particularily the Nebula/Defender class Star Destroyers.
Even considering the poor showing of the EU-described SSDs, the MC90s and MC80Bs have decent showings at any rate, and those SSDs were described at more powerful than ISDs.
Hell, the old MC80's were still considered a near match for at least the older ISD models.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Connor MacLeod wrote:The New-class ships were able to as well, particularily the Nebula/Defender class Star Destroyers.
The New-Class ships were also later than the MC80B/MC90 and of a wholly different design linage (IIRC, they're on the VSD line).

I particularly like the design of the DSD since they deleted the massive conning tower; it's smaller, cheaper and for capital ship combat arguably a better design. The NR seems to have dispensed more or less with the multirole designs the Empire needed.
Hell, the old MC80's were still considered a near match for at least the older ISD models.
Indeed. The MC80 and MC80A would be defeated but probably would inflict severe, if not crippling, damage. The Liberty-class might actually score a kill (perhaps at severe damage to herself) since that design seems to be of a greater tonnage (and likely better combat capability).
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:The poor showings of the Executors either require special circumstances for the Iron Fist and the Knight Hammer both, that all Executors suffer some weakness, or that the MC80B and MC90s are more powerful (and as I believe, larger) than previously thought.
Perhaps a little of column A, a little of column B? The MC80B is certainly a powerful design - the original EGVV said that it could outlast comparable Imperial ships due to its massive shielding; the MC90 improved in all areas (especially multi-species crew compatibility)
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

phongn wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:The poor showings of the Executors either require special circumstances for the Iron Fist and the Knight Hammer both, that all Executors suffer some weakness, or that the MC80B and MC90s are more powerful (and as I believe, larger) than previously thought.
Perhaps a little of column A, a little of column B? The MC80B is certainly a powerful design - the original EGVV said that it could outlast comparable Imperial ships due to its massive shielding; the MC90 improved in all areas (especially multi-species crew compatibility)
I suspect the MC80B's were actually larger than the earlier MC80's despite being said only 1200 meters long (Hell, Home One was considered that large!) - they carried 4-8 fighter squadrons (earlier MC80's could only carry 3!) in addition to all that other stuff. I suspect they might ahve carried heavier guns despite the official evidence to the contrary as well.
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

FTeik wrote:
Ender wrote:
FTeik wrote:The structure Jaina and Kyp destroyed was a shipwomb, not a worldship.
Negatiive, that interpratation was a fuckup by others, Nem Yim specifically says they targeted and destroyed a worldship. the shipwomb is the remnants of the planet, not a structure itself.
I would think the shipwomb to be a much more solid structure, than the widespread debris of a destroyed planet.
the description of the place in rebirth and Nem Yom's statements overrule your thoughts.
About the Republic-Class-CRUISER we only know, that it is 1,000 meters long (interview with WJW, the ship is supposed to be an easily mass-produced vessel by KDY)
Gee, thanks for the evidence I asked for.

And you are aware that Executor class vessels were easily mass produced vessels by KDY, right?
KDY-warship of unknown class mentioned in "Star by Star": 1,000 meter, possibly Republic-Class (although that name first appeard in DW)
Name really first appeared back in the black Fleet Crisis[/quote]

For the STAR DESTROYER, not the CRUISER.

Did i wrote NOT TO CONFUSE WITH THE REPUBLIC-CLASS-SD just for fun or what?[/quote]How about some proof like I asked for rather then a vague reference and a repition that you are right?

Mediator-Class-Battlecruiser: lenght unknown
If cruisers can be in the range of 3km and battleships as small as 6 km, I'd say 4km would be a safe guess for now.
Just that the supposed-to-be-more-powerful Viscount-Stardefender can just challenge an ISD.[/quote]No "just" about it. According to the movies, a Death Star can engage an ISD
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Connor MacLeod wrote:I suspect the MC80B's were actually larger than the earlier MC80's despite being said only 1200 meters long (Hell, Home One was considered that large!) - they carried 4-8 fighter squadrons (earlier MC80's could only carry 3!) in addition to all that other stuff. I suspect they might ahve carried heavier guns despite the official evidence to the contrary as well.
Eh, a 1200m-long craft should be able to hold 4-8 fighter squadrons. They might well be larger and I'd suspect they'd have better gun layouts than the MC80/MC80As had.
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Post by FTeik »

Connor MacLeod wrote:It says that it can engage Star Destroyers. That doesnt mean its equal to (it gives no indication of whether it just matches it or exceeds it, actually.)
True.

But i would think, that the gap in performance between the two ships would be really small. Now if they would have said "it can almost engage Super Star Destroyers "or "can engage three Star Destroyers at once". But what we get is "it can engage imperial Star Destroyers" and that from a ship, that is supposed to be twice the size of the biggest ships the MC have ever built.
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.

"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Post by FTeik »

Ender wrote:
FTeik wrote:
Ender wrote:Negatiive, that interpratation was a fuckup by others, Nem Yim specifically says they targeted and destroyed a worldship. the shipwomb is the remnants of the planet, not a structure itself.
I would think the shipwomb to be a much more solid structure, than the widespread debris of a destroyed planet.
the description of the place in rebirth and Nem Yom's statements overrule your thoughts.
Having rushed through "Rebirth" last night, i had to discover that you are right (although, considering the importance of the worldship, there might be a slight chance, that the huge structure (that didn´t resemble other worldships seen so far) was the shipwomb, with the worldship inside).
About the Republic-Class-CRUISER we only know, that it is 1,000 meters long (interview with WJW, the ship is supposed to be an easily mass-produced vessel by KDY)
Gee, thanks for the evidence I asked for.
Do i look like i would download or buy every bit of information i get about SW? Much of what i know i only memorize and if i don´t have the source myself i have to trust the guy, who quoted it in the first place, was honest.

The thing about the Republic-Class-Cruiser as an easily mass-produced vessel was on theforce.net in the Authors and Artists-Section, Walter Jon Williams. The link is http: //boards.theforce.net/message.asp?topic=5816776&page=27.

Unfortunately it doesn´t say anything about the lenght of the vessel, but i´m sure i´ll find that again, too, given enough time.

And you are aware that Executor class vessels were easily mass produced vessels by KDY, right?
Your point? If you are talking about industrial abilities i want to remind you, that the NR employes/d a different approach of building ships, than the empire. Even if we get more standard ships with the New Class-vessels, they are suddenly vanished and replaced by a new design. Ask yourself: How many NR-ships "that can engage a star destroyer" have we seen over the years.
How about some proof like I asked for rather then a vague reference and a repition that you are right?
Destiny´s Way, page 45/46:
Nine flights of fighters. Four corellian gunships. Three Kuat Systems Republic-Class-CRUISERS.
Just that the supposed-to-be-more-powerful Viscount-Stardefender can just challenge an ISD.
No "just" about it. According to the movies, a Death Star can engage an ISD[/quote]

And of course an ISD can engage a DeathStar. But would this give us some values for comparison?

As for the MC80 or MC90 better than an ISD i fail to remember, where and when those ships showed to be superior (aside from KJA´s Darksaber).

And if i count the ds for damage in the old WEG-stats together i get 480 ds for the ISD-I, 930 ds for the ISD-II, but only 252 ds for the MC80 and 426 ds for the MC90, the Republic-SD 660 ds and the Defender-SD 832 ds.

Alright, those are game-stats, but what shall we do?
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.

"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

FTeik wrote:
Connor MacLeod wrote:It says that it can engage Star Destroyers. That doesnt mean its equal to (it gives no indication of whether it just matches it or exceeds it, actually.)
True.

But i would think, that the gap in performance between the two ships would be really small. Now if they would have said "it can almost engage Super Star Destroyers "or "can engage three Star Destroyers at once". But what we get is "it can engage imperial Star Destroyers" and that from a ship, that is supposed to be twice the size of the biggest ships the MC have ever built.
:roll: If you're going to start playing semantics games, I can point out that it only says it can engage an Imperial (as in the Navy it belongs to, not the "name" of the class.) Star Destroyer, which could mean anything from a Victory class up to something much larger (Alleigance classes, one of the o ther various class types Saxton has identified such as from Dark Empire, etc.)

I remind you that as you've already said, the size of the Star Defender is much greater than the Home One class (Ref: Vector PRime) - which itself is nearly 4 kilometers long, suggesting it *is* probably much more powerful than an Imperator, but less powerful than an Executor-class.
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

FTeik wrote:
About the Republic-Class-CRUISER we only know, that it is 1,000 meters long (interview with WJW, the ship is supposed to be an easily mass-produced vessel by KDY)
Gee, thanks for the evidence I asked for.
Do i look like i would download or buy every bit of information i get about SW? Much of what i know i only memorize and if i don´t have the source myself i have to trust the guy, who quoted it in the first place, was honest.

The thing about the Republic-Class-Cruiser as an easily mass-produced vessel was on theforce.net in the Authors and Artists-Section, Walter Jon Williams. The link is http: //boards.theforce.net/message.asp?topic=5816776&page=27.

Unfortunately it doesn´t say anything about the lenght of the vessel, but i´m sure i´ll find that again, too, given enough time.
the length is the key bit that proves the distinction that they are seperate classes.

And you are aware that Executor class vessels were easily mass produced vessels by KDY, right?
Your point? If you are talking about industrial abilities i want to remind you, that the NR employes/d a different approach of building ships, than the empire.
My point is the his description there doesn't give us alot of information.
Even if we get more standard ships with the New Class-vessels, they are suddenly vanished and replaced by a new design. Ask yourself: How many NR-ships "that can engage a star destroyer" have we seen over the years.
All of them. Any ship can engage another, its just a question of who wins and by how much. thats why that sentance provides zero useful information.
How about some proof like I asked for rather then a vague reference and a repition that you are right?
Destiny´s Way, page 45/46:
Nine flights of fighters. Four corellian gunships. Three Kuat Systems Republic-Class-CRUISERS.
And as I said before, the weapons loadout and design makes the Republic class SD rate as a KDY scale cruiser.
Just that the supposed-to-be-more-powerful Viscount-Stardefender can just challenge an ISD.
No "just" about it. According to the movies, a Death Star can engage an ISD
And of course an ISD can engage a DeathStar. But would this give us some values for comparison?[/quote]No, it wouldn't. That's my POINT.
As for the MC80 or MC90 better than an ISD i fail to remember, where and when those ships showed to be superior (aside from KJA´s Darksaber).
MC80B ad MC90 are both in the cruiser scale, so they should be able to hand an ISD its ass on a silver platter.
And if i count the ds for damage in the old WEG-stats together i get 480 ds for the ISD-I, 930 ds for the ISD-II, but only 252 ds for the MC80 and 426 ds for the MC90, the Republic-SD 660 ds and the Defender-SD 832 ds.

Alright, those are game-stats, but what shall we do?
Nebula class stats are useless for the comparison to Republic class stats as they wre from different systems, D6 and D20
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Connor MacLeod wrote:
phongn wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:The poor showings of the Executors either require special circumstances for the Iron Fist and the Knight Hammer both, that all Executors suffer some weakness, or that the MC80B and MC90s are more powerful (and as I believe, larger) than previously thought.
Perhaps a little of column A, a little of column B? The MC80B is certainly a powerful design - the original EGVV said that it could outlast comparable Imperial ships due to its massive shielding; the MC90 improved in all areas (especially multi-species crew compatibility)
I suspect the MC80B's were actually larger than the earlier MC80's despite being said only 1200 meters long (Hell, Home One was considered that large!) - they carried 4-8 fighter squadrons (earlier MC80's could only carry 3!) in addition to all that other stuff. I suspect they might ahve carried heavier guns despite the official evidence to the contrary as well.
Each of the MC80 letters are radically different designs, so I've toyed with the idea that possibly the number stands for some sort of time measurement, just as one gets "1974" into the AK-47, and some other classification basis than mere model. Afterall, they all are different designs and often have different purposes.

(Home One) - (modified starliner?) Carrier(?)/Battleship -- Commandship
MC80 - stock modified starliner
MC80 (Liberty) - heavier modified starliner
MC80a Post-Endor production model (easier for mass-production?)
MC80B Post-Endor Battlecruiser/Commandship
MC90 Production Model Battleship/Battlecruiser/Commandship
phongn wrote:Eh, a 1200m-long craft should be able to hold 4-8 fighter squadrons. They might well be larger and I'd suspect they'd have better gun layouts than the MC80/MC80As had.
The question is if that gun-layout on a 1200 meter vessel could be better than the entire front wedge of an Executor-class (albeit likely a dilapidated one)?
Last edited by Illuminatus Primus on 2003-10-06 07:36pm, edited 1 time in total.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

The ISD apparently couldn't bring all its forward guns to bear.. only some that could "Depress sufficiently" to target the Mon Remonda. Thius might exclude the heavy guns, since I suspect the Mon Remonda was in the ventral facing of the Iron Fist.
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

phongn wrote:
Connor MacLeod wrote:I suspect the MC80B's were actually larger than the earlier MC80's despite being said only 1200 meters long (Hell, Home One was considered that large!) - they carried 4-8 fighter squadrons (earlier MC80's could only carry 3!) in addition to all that other stuff. I suspect they might ahve carried heavier guns despite the official evidence to the contrary as well.
Eh, a 1200m-long craft should be able to hold 4-8 fighter squadrons. They might well be larger and I'd suspect they'd have better gun layouts than the MC80/MC80As had.
Or heavier guns simply.
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Post by FTeik »

Connor MacLeod wrote:
FTeik wrote:
Connor MacLeod wrote:It says that it can engage Star Destroyers. That doesnt mean its equal to (it gives no indication of whether it just matches it or exceeds it, actually.)
True.

But i would think, that the gap in performance between the two ships would be really small. Now if they would have said "it can almost engage Super Star Destroyers "or "can engage three Star Destroyers at once". But what we get is "it can engage imperial Star Destroyers" and that from a ship, that is supposed to be twice the size of the biggest ships the MC have ever built.
:roll: If you're going to start playing semantics games, I can point out that it only says it can engage an Imperial (as in the Navy it belongs to, not the "name" of the class.) Star Destroyer, which could mean anything from a Victory class up to something much larger (Alleigance classes, one of the o ther various class types Saxton has identified such as from Dark Empire, etc.)

I remind you that as you've already said, the size of the Star Defender is much greater than the Home One class (Ref: Vector PRime) - which itself is nearly 4 kilometers long, suggesting it *is* probably much more powerful than an Imperator, but less powerful than an Executor-class.
In that case they wouldn´t have wrote "imperial" with a capital "I". :lol:

The problem is, that we are dealing with a source (or school of thinking at LFL) that claims "Home One" to be 1,200 meters long, ignores the existance of the bigger imperial ships seen in DE and other inconsistencies. Since the above is the only quote i know connected to the firepower of the Viscount the ship could be eight kilometers long and still "only" be able to engage an ISD (what would make it seriously underpowered).
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.

"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Post by FTeik »

[quote="Ender]the length is the key bit that proves the distinction that they are seperate classes.[/quote]

The Republic-Class-Star Destroyer is build by Rendili-Stardrives.

The Republic-Class-Cruiser by the Kuati.

The first is a star destroyer, the other a cruiser.

Should be enough to show, that they are different ships.

My point is the his description there doesn't give us alot of information.
If there would be more information, i would have probably posted it. :?
All of them. Any ship can engage another, its just a question of who wins and by how much. thats why that sentance provides zero useful information.
On the contrary. It shows, that the NR designed one vessel after the other, that could engage an ISD, but wasn´t satisfied with anyone of them. The ISD was that good, that the empire built at least 25,000 of those things.
And as I said before, the weapons loadout and design makes the Republic class SD rate as a KDY scale cruiser.
Not according to the official line of thought. Besides, the Rendili-Class-SD is smaller and has comparable weapons compared to the KDY-SD, not some kind of KDY-scale cruiser we only briefly glimpsed in DE.

MC80B ad MC90 are both in the cruiser scale, so they should be able to hand an ISD its ass on a silver platter.
What makes you think a cruiser built by the MC can hand an KDY-SD its ass on a silver platter?
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.

"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

FTeik wrote:What makes you think a cruiser built by the MC can hand an KDY-SD its ass on a silver platter?
Because they can go head-to-head with SSDs?
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Post by FTeik »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:
FTeik wrote:What makes you think a cruiser built by the MC can hand an KDY-SD its ass on a silver platter?
Because they can go head-to-head with SSDs?
In novels written by KJA.

If they are supported by fleets of other ships.

If they have help from the inside (Gara Pentathol, Callista)

If the SSDs aren´t up to stats (Iron Fist might NOT be Executor-Class and saw long and extreme campaigns (Zsinj started with a single sector and was holding one third of the galaxy in CoPL).
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.

"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
Post Reply