Hawaii might be okay but they'd have to dredge the channel quite often in Pearl Harbor to make sure it was deep enough to get in an out all the time, especially with a full load. In order for the Abraham Lincoln to pull in to Pearl we had to be running rather light to make sure our draft was high enough. I'm sure the newer carriers would have at least the same problems if not more so.
I'm not sure Hawaii really helps much in responding quickly. As I recall it's only about 5 days from the West Coast of the US to Hawaii at relatively high speed. Maybe it could be done faster it the airwing is already onboard.
Guam, nothing like sticking 6000 plus more sailors in the middle of nowhere. I'm presuming that the ship and the airwing would have to be there otherwise what's the point. I'm sure the people of Guam would love having that many more squids running around the island.
Personally, I've thought for awhile that the Navy has been putting too many of it's ships in too few ports, particularly on the East Coast where nearly all the surface fleet is in Norfolk, VA.Associated Press on Military.com wrote:
Navy May Move 1 Of Its Carriers
Associated Press
October 2, 2003
WASHINGTON - One aircraft carrier may be moved permanently from the continental United States to Hawaii or Guam so that the Navy could respond more quickly to a crisis in North Korea or elsewhere in the Asia-Pacific region, the Pacific Fleet commander said Wednesday.
Adm. Walter F. Doran, who is responsible for all Navy ships in the Pacific, said it is unclear whether the carrier would move from an East Coast or a West Coast base, and that no decisions have been made. The Navy has five carriers based on the West Coast, six on the East Coast and one in Japan.
The possibility of a carrier move is part of a broader Pentagon study on repositioning forces around the world to reflect new priorities. Although the war on terrorism is currently focused mainly on the Persian Gulf region and Central Asia, the Asia-Pacific region is attracting more terrorist groups, Doran said.
The Bush administration also is concerned about the communist regime of North Korea and its potential for exporting the nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities it acknowledges it is developing.
The case of Navy aircraft carriers is complicated by the fact that creating a new homeport in Hawaii or Guam would involve considerable cost and raise political and environmental issues. It also would affect thousands of Navy families and would require moving a carrier air wing.
"I'm looking at where I could better or best be positioned," Doran told a group of reporters over breakfast. "Would it be better to move a carrier to Hawaii? Would it be better to move a carrier to Guam? These are major muscle movements. This is not being done on the back of an envelope."
Doran said he was in Washington this week to meet with Navy leaders on two high-priority issues: improving the Navy's ability to track submarines in the Pacific and getting ready to maintain a continuous ship presence in the Sea of Japan to detect a potential missile launch from North Korea.
Regarding the missile detection mission, he said, "If asked, we will be ready to do it." He said it was possible that he could be ordered to do it as soon as Oct. 1, 2004, but no final decision has been made.
On the submarine-tracking mission, Doran said that when the Cold War ended the Navy let its anti-submarine warfare capabilities erode, since there no longer was an open-ocean sub threat from the Soviet Union.
But in recent years China, North Korea and other countries have acquired diesel-electric submarines that are so quiet in the water that it is difficult for U.S. forces to detect and track them.
"We have to be able to deal with that," Doran said.
Moving all that they suggest to Guam would have to cost a fortune. Imagine all of the family housing and housing in general that would have to be built.
Incidentally, Guam is the only base I've been to that had beer in the vending machines.
One good thing, carriers currently have male and female sailors on them so it wouldn't just be 6,000 guys being dumped on Hawaii or Guam.
