![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Just look at the size of that bitch!
D'oh! ---- Probrem corected
![Embarrassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Moderator: Edi
And each cylinder produces more HP then the entire steam plant on HMS Minotaur, the largest of the broadside ironclads. But the triple expansion engines on a high end liner are more impressive. So many man crushing exposed moving parts..Frank Hipper wrote:The thing's crankshaft weighs as much as an entire destroyer of 100 years ago.
*snort* not likely. I assume you are being sarcastic, but gas turbine engines aren't nearly as powerful as that. My old man's King Air B300 has two large turbines (larger than realistic car-size) that pump out around 2000 bhp a piece. Powerful yes, but hardly millions of bhp.Sea Skimmer wrote: What I really want is for someone to build a gas turbine the size of this mere diesel engine. The thing would probably put out millions of HP, in the unlikely event it doesn't explode when switched on.
An LM2500 puts out 30,000hp and is about the size of a moderate sedan. Scale that up to the size of the diesel in question and you would indeed but looking at millions of HP. It just seems unlikely that any investment in money could let us craft turbine blades that fucking huge. But If Ive ever got a couple spare billion, well the fun is really going to start.The Kernel wrote: EDIT: Ahhh, I see you are refering to the disel here, my bad. I think the largest example of a gas turbine is the ones used on board the most massive cruisliners, although I'm not sure how many naval vessels still use turbines and how big they get. Still, millions of bhp seems excessive given that turbines aren't that much more powerful then regular gasoline combustion engines, they are just more efficeient in larger sizes.
There also much much smaller then what I envision, and of course they don't need a shuttle of quarter million ton supertankers to bring in more fuel.The nuclear/electric reactors on Nimitz-aircraft carriers don't even make nearly that much power. I believe all four steam turbines only come out to 280,000 bhp.
I'd like to see you remove a steam turbine from a major warship in 72 hours, without cutting the deck at any point. The USN is considering them for future major carriers anyway, and its already decided that all the new gators are going to be gas driven.The Duchess of Zeon wrote:Bah, Gas Turbines are just for over-glorified FACs. *looks to the Nimitz* Steam is still King.
Show me a gas turbine that can run on a fuel rod the size of a brick and we'll talkSea Skimmer wrote:I'd like to see you remove a steam turbine from a major warship in 72 hours, without cutting the deck at any point. The USN is considering them for future major carriers anyway, and its already decided that all the new gators are going to be gas driven.The Duchess of Zeon wrote:Bah, Gas Turbines are just for over-glorified FACs. *looks to the Nimitz* Steam is still King.
Aren't they also considering nuclear-turboelectric drive now?Sea Skimmer wrote:I'd like to see you remove a steam turbine from a major warship in 72 hours, without cutting the deck at any point. The USN is considering them for future major carriers anyway, and its already decided that all the new gators are going to be gas driven.