AniThyng wrote:
well, quite simply most of the electorate is more concerned with the economy and stability then gay rights. we don't have a 8 year only rule like you guys so as long as he can command the respect of the majority of people his party will win and he will be PM.
Well, back when we were just a new nation and George Washington was
president, Washignton and the rest of Founders had read a lot of
Gibbons, and they had noticed that the average time that a
Roman Emperor had in power before he was killed or overthrown
was about eight years, so they basically followed the tradition of
just two four year terms set by Washington; it wasn't codified into law
until after FDR's death; everyone agreed that president for 12 years was
just too long.
it doesn't help that the opposition is comprised of a fundie islam party and a chinese chauvinist party. and in a attempt to capitalise on the anuar case, the DAP[democratic action party, chinese based] allied with the islamic party and got very badly burned by moderate chinese voters who would rather see another 5 years of dr. M then a potential islamic theocracy.
Well, so I guess there's something good about M's party then. ANYTHING
is better than a Hard KKKore Islamic Theocracy, even if Dr M sounds like
a fundie at times when he gets into his long rambling speeches.
no unexplained deaths. you hear alot of allegations of electorial fraud, but none is substantiated. more to the point, two of the more rural[but resource rich] malay heartland states are under opposition state governments, and there are a significant amount of opposition MPs in parliarment, particularly in northern Penang state, [where AMD makes its chips. damn i want that Athlon 64.]and the capital Kuala Lumpur itself.
Hmm, interesting. Do you have Hanging Chads?
so, no, we do not have nonsense like 99% electorial turnout with 120% of the vote going to the party candidate
Ah, you mean Saddam Hussein's Election right before the War wasn't
legal? Oh the Horrors!:lol:
this has always amused me. over here we are more aware of your Veto powers and consider the UN to be your tool
Well, everyone on the Security council can veto it. The French, British,
Russians, and I think the CHinese have veto power along with the US.
say,off-topic, enlighten me. were the russians in the UN with influence during the Korean war? did they actually approve of the "UN Command" that would push the commies back?
That was the one day their guy wasn't at the security council; since then
they've never missed a meeting
keheheh. hey LOOK! A three headed monkey!
Ahh Monkey Island Fan then.
yes. at its 'best'. at its worst, the secret police are dragging me from my computer to toss me in a dungeon beneath the presidential palace as we speak.
Over here we just have the ATF.......*sound of door being knocked down*
"FACE DOWN ON THE FLOOR!"
"Uh wha? I don't have any guns..."
*sound of MP-5s firing*
"He was reaching for a gun! Oh wait, it was his computer mouse. Oh well, good shoot!"