'Charlie's Angels 2' Kill me now...

Superman · Post by **Superman** » 2003-10-26 01:45am

My god, my girl rented and is watching this piece of trash right now. This is absolutely horrible and beyond stupid. I really think you have to have an IQ in the negative range to enjoy this tripe.

Have you seen it?

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2003-10-26 01:46am

What were you expecting, Shakespeare?

I've seen it, and I hate myself for it. The worse thing about it, is just about everyone in the movie is completely above the material.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-10-26 01:47am

When I saw them advertising it with pictures of the three actresses wearing skimpy clothes in Maxim magazine, I realized what a shit movie it must be. You don't pull out the stops like that to advertise a film that you already think is going to do well at the box office.

If I want to see T&A in bad plots, I'll watch a selection from my extensive collection of pornography.

Superman · Post by **Superman** » 2003-10-26 01:52am

I just looked at the reviews for this on Yahoo. The average watcher gave it a 'B.' I am officially giving up hope for the human race. The average person is an idiot. I always knew it, but this really drives it home.

SyntaxVorlon · Post by **SyntaxVorlon** » 2003-10-26 02:01am

Superman wrote:I just looked at the reviews for this on Yahoo. The average watcher gave it a 'B.' I am officially giving up hope for the human race. The average person is an idiot. I always knew it, but this really drives it home.

You ought to realize that half of them are dumber than that!

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2003-10-26 09:03am

I've seen it...more glad then not I knew the manager at the theatre so I got free tickets.

It was pretty much low end porn tease...nothing more.

Demiurge · Post by **Demiurge** » 2003-10-26 09:47am

I might watch it if it had more attractive women. As it is, Drew Barrymore's ass is not enough to warrant a rental.

Don't get me wrong, they're not ugly. I just don't think that they're as great as most say.

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2003-10-26 09:52am

THey must die for besmirching the name of the Ka-52

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2003-10-26 09:58am

So it had a predictable pot, not too good action and a crap soundtrack, but it also had Cameron Diaz in a bakini!!! That on it'self redeemed the whole movie for me

Post by **Vympel** » 2003-10-26 10:03am

When I saw the preview and saw it, it looked like the movie rode the 'short bus' so to speak- seriously, it looked retarded. I couldn't understand what was going on. Even the presence of a Ka-52 couldn't get me to watch it.

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2003-10-26 11:37am

Well one more movie to my list of movies i will not waste money to see,if i ever watch it i`ll wait for it to air on tv,just like the first Charlie`s angels that airs this week on a FC network.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2003-10-26 12:26pm

Saw it, loved it. So there

YT300000 · Post by **YT300000** » 2003-10-26 01:10pm

The only good thing about that piece of shit was that it had a .50 Desert Eagle. Come to think of it, it had two.

Still sucked, though.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2003-10-26 07:35pm

InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there

Possible bias note: You're a girl.

EmperorMing · Post by **EmperorMing** » 2003-10-27 01:55am

It was cheap entertainment when a friend of mine rented it.

And I have seen worse.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2003-10-27 02:25am

EmperorMing wrote: And I have seen worse.

Which is shining testamount to a movie's quality, considering how crappy so many movies are.

Post by **Kuja** » 2003-10-27 02:44am

Superman wrote:Have you seen it?

I haven't, but I can still virtually guarantee that House of the Dead was worse.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2003-10-27 04:59am

DPDarkPrimus wrote:
InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there
Possible bias note: You're a girl.

Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore

EmperorMing · Post by **EmperorMing** » 2003-10-27 06:20am

InnerBrat wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:
InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there
Possible bias note: You're a girl.
Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore

You're forgiven...

Crown · Post by **Crown** » 2003-10-27 09:17am

I enjoyed the movie.

Darth Fanboy · Post by **Darth Fanboy** » 2003-10-27 09:22am

InnerBrat wrote:Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore

.........SIGGED!

Death from the Sea · Post by **Death from the Sea** » 2003-10-27 03:54pm

Ok,
Demi Moore= sexy
Lucy Lui= sexy
Cameron Diaz= sexy(except when she was in the CSI disguise)
Drew Barrymore= NOT sexy, I don't think she looked good in a single part of that movie.

the movie was crap but it was good for some eye candy.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2003-10-27 04:16pm

InnerBrat wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:
InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there
Possible bias note: You're a girl.
Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore

Can't argue with that.

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2003-10-27 04:47pm

Last night i watched the first Charlie`s Angels movie,and the action was mildly interesting some scenes were too unrealistic others plain stupid,the girls have too much knowledge of weaponry to be believable.

and Bosley (Bill Murray) carving a gun in soap with his teeth come on

aphexmonster · Post by **aphexmonster** » 2003-10-27 04:49pm

i fell asleep both times i tried to watch the first one.... i didn't bother going to see the second one. putting " smack my bitch up" in a movie doesn't improve it, but most action movie directors seem to think it does ....

( lets pump up the crowd )

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

'Charlie's Angels 2' Kill me now...

'Charlie's Angels 2' Kill me now...

Re: 'Charlie's Angels 2' Kill me now...