Future King of England, Prince Charles

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2003-11-10 02:22pm

You've probably heard by now the allegations that he was caught packing his assisstants fudge. Thoughts?

Stravo · Post by **Stravo** » 2003-11-10 02:23pm

I haven't heard all the allegations since there seems to be some sort of injunction in place.

Zac Naloen · Post by **Zac Naloen** » 2003-11-10 02:26pm

does it matter really?

maybe im being uber liberal, but what he gets up to is really his own business why should there be a scandle over it?

or maybe i just don't care

Glocksman · Post by **Glocksman** » 2003-11-10 02:26pm

So that's the story that the BBC won't spell out?

Hmm....

The one thing I did admire about the Bolsheviks was how they dealt with their royals.

The only thing this story does is illustrate the total irrelevancy of the Royal Family in today's world. The monarchy should be abandoned.

Hamel · Post by **Hamel** » 2003-11-10 02:31pm

BoredShirtless wrote:You've probably heard by now the allegations that he was caught packing his assisstants fudge. Thoughts?

So, he's gay? Or is his assistant a woman?

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2003-11-10 02:36pm

Hamel wrote:
BoredShirtless wrote:You've probably heard by now the allegations that he was caught packing his assisstants fudge. Thoughts?
So, he's gay? Or is his assistant a woman?

The assisstant was Michael Fawcett. These are all allegations btw, they could turn out bullshit. It's interesting, I've tried bringing up the article from the SMH (Aussie newspaper) on it yesterday as it went into detail, but lo and behold...I can't find it anymore.

Stravo · Post by **Stravo** » 2003-11-10 02:37pm

I think the far more disturbing story is how the royal family was able to muzzle the supposedly free press in England over this scandal. Imagination the sheer madness that would have ensued here if Clinton was able to muzzle the press so effectively during the Lewinsky scandal?

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2003-11-10 02:38pm

Stravo wrote:I think the far more disturbing story is how the royal family was able to muzzle the supposedly free press in England over this scandal.

The Aussie press too.

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2003-11-10 02:40pm

The funniest part of the damn story is they denied it before it was published,anyway who cares if he takes it analy or any other way.

Col. Crackpot · Post by **Col. Crackpot** » 2003-11-10 02:41pm

it's like they say in England: One in the bum is worth 2 in the bush.

Zac Naloen · Post by **Zac Naloen** » 2003-11-10 02:44pm

Col. Crackpot wrote:it's like they say in England: One in the bum is worth 2 in the bush.

[heavy cockney accent]I thought they was talking 'bout birds?[/heavy cockney accent]

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2003-11-10 02:50pm

I proclaim myself Prince Sheppard, Heir in waiting to the british throne,
and if I oust the Windsors, I shall push for a massive British military
buildup, and make the Royal Navy a force to be reocked with again..

(seriously, I could probably do it, through my father's side of the family
which is from Scotland)

Companion Cube · Post by **Companion Cube** » 2003-11-10 02:55pm

MKSheppard wrote:I proclaim myself Prince Sheppard, Heir in waiting to the british throne,
and if I oust the Windsors, I shall push for a massive British military
buildup, and make the Royal Navy a force to be reocked with again..

(seriously, I could probably do it, through my father's side of the family
which is from Scotland)

Well, that depends on the level of inbreeding evident in you and your immediate family. No visible deformities in any of them, and you don't stand a chance.

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2003-11-10 02:58pm

3rd Impact wrote: Well, that depends on the level of inbreeding evident in you and your immediate family. No visible deformities in any of them, and you don't stand a chance.

Well, there is precedent for a furriner to become King.

That said, if this is true, and the boys turn out to bat for the
other side too, kiss goodbye to the last German Monarchs.

Superman · Post by **Superman** » 2003-11-10 03:01pm

Gee, the prince of England might be gay. Quick! Stop the presses!

Ok, who gives a rat's hairy ass?

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2003-11-10 03:13pm

Charles? Future king?

*laughs uproariously*

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2003-11-10 03:18pm

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Charles? Future king?

*laughs uproariously*

Does that mean you plan to assassinate him in his sleep?

SyntaxVorlon · Post by **SyntaxVorlon** » 2003-11-10 03:23pm

Considering the number of homosexual and bisexual kings england has had, I wouldn't be surprised, shocked or put off. His ears are too big anyway.

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2003-11-10 03:33pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Admiral Valdemar wrote:Charles? Future king?

*laughs uproariously*
Does that mean you plan to assassinate him in his sleep?

Pfft, what fun would that be? I have no interest in any of the Royals, the only reason I'm not shouting republic is because a) the RAF and RN would become the British Airforce or something equally gay sounding, b) Prince Phillip is fucking sorted.

Anyway, William will be heir to the throne, not Charles and he knows it.

kojikun · Post by **kojikun** » 2003-11-10 03:35pm

Gods, those royals, they're some of the most self conscious people on earth. They need to loosen up and stop being afraid about public image. They're royalty, public image be damned! If Charles really is bisexual, this is a phenomenal opportunity for him to promote tolerance and he should take the chance.

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2003-11-10 03:40pm

Stravo wrote:I think the far more disturbing story is how the royal family was able to muzzle the supposedly free press in England over this scandal. Imagination the sheer madness that would have ensued here if Clinton was able to muzzle the press so effectively during the Lewinsky scandal?

It was a court that did it and quite legally, and the UK has a large pile of secrecy laws still on the books and still in use that date to WW1 and some even before. But then what do you expect? That country still keeps many documents from the Crimean secret for basically no other reason then to protect the reputation of several notable politicians and military commanders.

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2003-11-10 03:44pm

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Stravo wrote:I think the far more disturbing story is how the royal family was able to muzzle the supposedly free press in England over this scandal. Imagination the sheer madness that would have ensued here if Clinton was able to muzzle the press so effectively during the Lewinsky scandal?
It was a court that did it and quite legally, and the UK has a large pile of secrecy laws still on the books and still in use that date to WW1 and some even before. But then what do you expect? That country still keeps many documents from the Crimean secret for basically no other reason then to protect the reputation of several notable politicians and military commanders.

Well there's no nation that can claim it hasn't got a few skeletons hidden in the closet. They don't want us to know, I don't care to know. It's a mutual agreement.

Aeolus · Post by **Aeolus** » 2003-11-10 04:21pm

Stravo wrote:I think the far more disturbing story is how the royal family was able to muzzle the supposedly free press in England over this scandal. Imagination the sheer madness that would have ensued here if Clinton was able to muzzle the press so effectively during the Lewinsky scandal?

I was not aware that Great Britain had the first amendment.

Aeolus · Post by **Aeolus** » 2003-11-10 04:23pm

MKSheppard wrote:
3rd Impact wrote: Well, that depends on the level of inbreeding evident in you and your immediate family. No visible deformities in any of them, and you don't stand a chance.
Well, there is precedent for a furriner to become King.

That said, if this is true, and the boys turn out to bat for the
other side too, kiss goodbye to the last German Monarchs.

I could see William giving the royal scepter to his mates. But Harry seems like the poster child for str8 jocks.

Lord Pounder · Post by **Lord Pounder** » 2003-11-10 04:25pm

Given the horse-woman charlie usually couples with a man is an improvement IMHO. Charlie will never be King anyway, his mother doesn't like him, Wills is the man for the job, what that job is i'm not sure.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Future King of England, Prince Charles

Future King of England, Prince Charles

Re: Future King of England, Prince Charles

Re: Future King of England, Prince Charles