Praxis wrote:The event horizon is supposed to be pinpoint size, however its gravity is strong enough to suck everything (including torpedoes and TL's) that gets within a meter into the eveny horizon.
That's contradictory. You're only guaranteed to suck in
everything if it comes within the event horizon of the singularity. That's practically the very definition of the event horizon.
Praxis wrote:Darth Wong wrote:It gets added to the mass of the black hole, and a low-mass singularity will spontaneously explode in a burst of gamma rays ... . What happens when the basals make the little black holes go away? The extra energy just vanishes?
Good point. Hadn't thought about that.
That's actually not that much of a problem for singularities massive enough to be compared to a pinhead in size. The Hawking temperature is T = hκ/(4π²k), where h is Planck's constant, κ = GM/r² is the surface gravity, and k is the Boltzmann constant [
ref]. Combining it with the Stefan-Boltzmann law (with σ = 2π⁵k⁴/(15h³c²)), this gives the radiation flux of the black hole as F = c²h/(7680π²r²). If the event horizon is 1.0mm in diameter, then it will radiate a meagre 3.1fW. It is extremely stable; if you want to get rid of it, just dump it somewhere.
The really tough part is creating them, moving them fast enough to be useful as a defense, and, of course, keeping them from crushing
you.
Praxis wrote:Kuroneko wrote:Assume the event horizon diameter is 1.0mm (it's actually a rather small pinhead). The corresponding singularity mass is therefore 3.4e23kg. ... So what if the singularity bends the trajectory of the weapons fire? It just means that one should fire to the sides, in such a way so that the singularity will adjust the trajectory to hit the ship.
This could be effected as well by my above statement in this post- if the Dovin Basals can manipulate time and space to confine the gravitic anomaly to a hard disk, that would be the 'void'...you'd have a shield.
In other words, their antigravity devices now have to constantly contain their effect? Like, say, the nine billion G's of gravitational acceleration at a distance of 50m from the singularity? Instead of dumping all that energy into antigravity containment, why not just get stronger shields?
Praxis wrote:BTW what you said about firing to the side...if the weapons go within a few meters of the event horizon, they should be sucked right up, correct?
No. The trajectories of everything will be bent toward the singularity. Whether they will fall in or not depends on the velocity of the projectile. Simply coming within a few metres will not guarantee that the singularity will swallow the projectile if it is fast enough (obviously, the best solution would be lasers).