Bush drops the steel tariffs

[Joe]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Nov30.html

'bout time.

[Iceberg]

Well, Bush wasn't likely to get much support in northern Minnesota anyway - the mining range is heavily DFL territory.

[Joe]

Of course not. It was a stupid political move in the long run, it only aroused the ire of his supporters.

[StarshipTitanic]

Could someone please copy and paste the article?

[Faram]

Could someone please copy and paste the article?

Google is your friend

President To Drop Tariffs On Steel
Bush Seeks to Avoid A Trade War and Its Political Fallout

By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, December 1, 2003; Page A01

The Bush administration has decided to repeal most of its 20-month-old tariffs on imported steel to head off a trade war that would have included foreign retaliation against products exported from politically crucial states, administration and industry sources said yesterday.


The officials would not say when President Bush will announce the decision but said it is likely to be this week. The officials said they had to allow for the possibility that he would make some change in the plan, but a source close to the White House said it was "all but set in stone."

European countries had vowed to respond to the tariffs, which were ruled illegal by the World Trade Organization, by imposing sanctions on up to $2.2 billion in exports from the United States, beginning as soon as Dec. 15. Japan issued a similar threat Wednesday. The sources said Bush's aides concluded they could not run the risk that the European Union would carry out its threat to impose sanctions on orange juice and other citrus products from Florida, motorcycles, farm machinery, textiles, shoes, and other products.

Bush advisers said they were aware the reversal could produce a backlash against him in several steel-producing states of the Rust Belt -- including Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio. That arc of states has been hit severely by losses in manufacturing jobs and will be among the most closely contested in his reelection race.

The sources said that Bush's aides agonized over the options to present to the president and that they considered it one of the diciest political calculations of this term. A source involved in the negotiations said White House aides looked for some step short of a full repeal that would satisfy the European Union but concluded that it was "technically possible but practically impossible."

Bush decided in March 2002 to impose tariffs of 8 to 30 percent on most steel imports from Europe, Asia and South America for three years. Officials acknowledged at the time that the decision was heavily influenced by the desire to help the Rust Belt states, but the departure from Bush's free-trade principles drew fierce criticism from his conservative supporters. After a blast of international opposition, the administration began approving exemptions.

The WTO's ruling against the tariffs was finalized three weeks ago, clearing the way for the retaliatory levies, and Bush's economic team concluded unanimously that the tariffs should be scrapped. The source involved in the negotiations said the consensus in the White House was that "keeping the tariffs in place would cause more economic disruption and pain for the broader economy than repealing them would for the steel industry."

A White House spokesman would not comment beyond saying that it is "still a matter under review by the president, and we'll make announcements when we have announcements to make."

Officials said the repeal could help Bush in Michigan, where automakers and parts factories are heavy consumers of steel and were hurt by the tariffs, but they said that was not the reason for the decision. In 2000, Bush won Ohio and West Virginia, a traditionally Democratic state. He lost Pennsylvania and Michigan, and they are among his top targets in 2004.

Bush travels today to Michigan to make remarks on the economy. Tomorrow he flies to Pittsburgh, headquarters of U.S. Steel Corp., which is the nation's largest domestic steel producer and led efforts to pressure the administration to retain the tariffs. Bush is going there for a fundraiser for his campaign. One of the organizers is Thomas J. Usher, U.S. Steel's chairman and chief executive.

A trade war could be used to bolster Democrats' claims that Bush has been a poor steward of jobs and could force his campaign to focus on manufacturing states where he would otherwise be safe. Republican officials, who had hoped the tariffs would help them make inroads with steelworkers, were disappointed in August when the United Steelworkers of America endorsed Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) for president.

The administration had foreshadowed the decision, most bluntly when U.S. Trade Representative Robert B. Zoellick told reporters last month that the tariffs had already helped the steel industry to restructure. "The safeguard gave the industry an opportunity to do what we hoped it would do," Zoellick was quoted as saying. Zoellick said when the tariffs were announced last year that they were meant to provide "breathing space" of "a temporary nature to try to give steel companies and steelworkers a chance to get back on their feet."

Steel executives, who have said they will feel betrayed by a repeal, argue that they made the investments and changes that the White House envisioned when the three-year tariffs were announced and that the administration should not buckle to European pressure. Industry sources said that with the decision all but made, the White House recently asked steel companies to present a proposal that would phase out the tariffs instead of eliminating them. These sources said they were pessimistic that Bush would accept the proposal.

Administration officials are bracing for blistering news coverage from Rust Belt states they have been courting, and a lobbyist said unions and the industry plan to organize "a strong and negative response." But a Republican source said Bush's aides have calculated that the decision alone will not swing the election in any of the steel states.

With heavy lobbying campaigns underway by both sides, including advertising in the affected areas, lawmakers from steel states wrote to Bush's senior adviser, Karl Rove, on Nov. 21 to request a meeting about the issue.

Staff writer Jonathan Weisman contributed to this report.

[Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi]

Could someone please copy and paste the article?

The Bush administration has decided to repeal most of its 20-month-old tariffs on imported steel to head off a trade war that would have included foreign retaliation against products exported from politically crucial states, administration and industry sources said yesterday.



The officials would not say when President Bush will announce the decision but said it is likely to be this week. The officials said they had to allow for the possibility that he would make some change in the plan, but a source close to the White House said it was "all but set in stone."

European countries had vowed to respond to the tariffs, which were ruled illegal by the World Trade Organization, by imposing sanctions on up to $2.2 billion in exports from the United States, beginning as soon as Dec. 15. Japan issued a similar threat Wednesday. The sources said Bush's aides concluded they could not run the risk that the European Union would carry out its threat to impose sanctions on orange juice and other citrus products from Florida, motorcycles, farm machinery, textiles, shoes, and other products.

Bush advisers said they were aware the reversal could produce a backlash against him in several steel-producing states of the Rust Belt -- including Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio. That arc of states has been hit severely by losses in manufacturing jobs and will be among the most closely contested in his reelection race.

The sources said that Bush's aides agonized over the options to present to the president and that they considered it one of the diciest political calculations of this term. A source involved in the negotiations said White House aides looked for some step short of a full repeal that would satisfy the European Union but concluded that it was "technically possible but practically impossible."

Bush decided in March 2002 to impose tariffs of 8 to 30 percent on most steel imports from Europe, Asia and South America for three years. Officials acknowledged at the time that the decision was heavily influenced by the desire to help the Rust Belt states, but the departure from Bush's free-trade principles drew fierce criticism from his conservative supporters. After a blast of international opposition, the administration began approving exemptions.

The WTO's ruling against the tariffs was finalized three weeks ago, clearing the way for the retaliatory levies, and Bush's economic team concluded unanimously that the tariffs should be scrapped. The source involved in the negotiations said the consensus in the White House was that "keeping the tariffs in place would cause more economic disruption and pain for the broader economy than repealing them would for the steel industry."

A White House spokesman would not comment beyond saying that it is "still a matter under review by the president, and we'll make announcements when we have announcements to make."

Officials said the repeal could help Bush in Michigan, where automakers and parts factories are heavy consumers of steel and were hurt by the tariffs, but they said that was not the reason for the decision. In 2000, Bush won Ohio and West Virginia, a traditionally Democratic state. He lost Pennsylvania and Michigan, and they are among his top targets in 2004.

Bush travels today to Michigan to make remarks on the economy. Tomorrow he flies to Pittsburgh, headquarters of U.S. Steel Corp., which is the nation's largest domestic steel producer and led efforts to pressure the administration to retain the tariffs. Bush is going there for a fundraiser for his campaign. One of the organizers is Thomas J. Usher, U.S. Steel's chairman and chief executive.

A trade war could be used to bolster Democrats' claims that Bush has been a poor steward of jobs and could force his campaign to focus on manufacturing states where he would otherwise be safe. Republican officials, who had hoped the tariffs would help them make inroads with steelworkers, were disappointed in August when the United Steelworkers of America endorsed Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) for president.

The administration had foreshadowed the decision, most bluntly when U.S. Trade Representative Robert B. Zoellick told reporters last month that the tariffs had already helped the steel industry to restructure. "The safeguard gave the industry an opportunity to do what we hoped it would do," Zoellick was quoted as saying. Zoellick said when the tariffs were announced last year that they were meant to provide "breathing space" of "a temporary nature to try to give steel companies and steelworkers a chance to get back on their feet."

Steel executives, who have said they will feel betrayed by a repeal, argue that they made the investments and changes that the White House envisioned when the three-year tariffs were announced and that the administration should not buckle to European pressure. Industry sources said that with the decision all but made, the White House recently asked steel companies to present a proposal that would phase out the tariffs instead of eliminating them. These sources said they were pessimistic that Bush would accept the proposal.

Administration officials are bracing for blistering news coverage from Rust Belt states they have been courting, and a lobbyist said unions and the industry plan to organize "a strong and negative response." But a Republican source said Bush's aides have calculated that the decision alone will not swing the election in any of the steel states.

With heavy lobbying campaigns underway by both sides, including advertising in the affected areas, lawmakers from steel states wrote to Bush's senior adviser, Karl Rove, on Nov. 21 to request a meeting about the issue.

How's that?

[Guardsman Bass]

WTF then.Steel executives whining about how it is bad to open up steel trade to Europe, even though they have made the "necessary changes".Look like somebody's bullshitting

Anyway, rather than let the steel industry die, or entitle it, why don't they do as the Euros did and spend money to MODERNIZE the damn thing.

[Faram]

OH and IMHO

EU should inpose sanctions against Bush for 2.2bil, just as a healthy thanx so fucking much for the illegal steel tarrifs.

[Joe]

Believe it or not, Faram, sanctions are not good for the economy, even if is the EU imposing them.

US steel is fine, anyway.

[Faram]

Believe it or not, Faram, sanctions are not good for the economy, even if is the EU imposing them.

US steel is fine, anyway.

Well tgey helped US Steel so payback is fair.

[Joe]

Helping U.S. steel (and even that is questionable with these tariffs) is not the same thing as helping the United States economy. Your sanctions wouldn't be good for anyone except the political interests they'd been designed to cater to.

[TrailerParkJawa]

I just heard on the radio, some Bush offical saying the temporary tariffs worked and now US Steel is okay. Hahahaa! Of course getting rid of the tariffs had nothing to do with a possible trade war.
Sometimes spin is amazing not matter what administration it comes from.