Republic Government & Parties

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Kitsune
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3412
Joined: 2003-04-05 10:52pm
Location: Foxes Den
Contact:

Republic Government & Parties

Post by Kitsune »

Does anyone know how a government based on the Us Constitution could be formed and keep out the two party system which seems to be immovable?
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine

"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
User avatar
The Cleric
BANNED
Posts: 2990
Joined: 2003-08-06 09:41pm
Location: The Right Hand Of GOD

Post by The Cleric »

There will never be a successful third party. The Democrats or Republicans will always win; however, they may have ideology changes that align them more with some third party ideals.
{} Thrawn wins. Any questions? {} Great Dolphin Conspiracy {} Proud member of the defunct SEGNOR {} Enjoy the rythmic hip thrusts {} In my past life I was either Vlad the Impaler or Katsushika Hokusai {}
NapoleonGH
Jedi Master
Posts: 1090
Joined: 2002-07-08 02:25pm
Location: NJ, USA
Contact:

Post by NapoleonGH »

there have been temporarily succcessful third parties that have gotten a few members into congress in the past, like the Populists in the late 19th century. There is a possibility for a third party to garner a fair amount of the seats in congress, but only if people became disillusioned with the dems or republicans, which can very well happen in the near future.
Festina Lente
My shoes are too tight and I've forgotten how to dance
User avatar
Symmetry
Jedi Master
Posts: 1237
Joined: 2003-08-21 10:09pm
Location: Random

Post by Symmetry »

StormTrooperTR889 wrote:There will never be a successful third party. The Democrats or Republicans will always win; however, they may have ideology changes that align them more with some third party ideals.
Not quite true, there have been periods of multiple parties or one party, but they don't last long before falling back into two-party stability. I can imagine events that would turn the Republicans or Democrats into regional parties, and let some other national third party (reform, green or libertarian probably) take over the opposition.
SDN Rangers: Gunnery Officer

They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
User avatar
Symmetry
Jedi Master
Posts: 1237
Joined: 2003-08-21 10:09pm
Location: Random

Post by Symmetry »

NapoleonGH wrote:there have been temporarily succcessful third parties that have gotten a few members into congress in the past, like the Populists in the late 19th century. There is a possibility for a third party to garner a fair amount of the seats in congress, but only if people became disillusioned with the dems or republicans, which can very well happen in the near future.
Its more complex than that. It was the Federalists vs. the Democratic Republicans until the war of 1812, when the Feds seemed to be unpatriotic and became a New England only party. After that the Democratic Republicans split into two parties.
SDN Rangers: Gunnery Officer

They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
User avatar
Symmetry
Jedi Master
Posts: 1237
Joined: 2003-08-21 10:09pm
Location: Random

Re: Republic Government & Parties

Post by Symmetry »

Kitsune wrote:Does anyone know how a government based on the Us Constitution could be formed and keep out the two party system which seems to be immovable?
Just use some other system for electing the president, and third parties will become more viable.
SDN Rangers: Gunnery Officer

They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
User avatar
Kitsune
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3412
Joined: 2003-04-05 10:52pm
Location: Foxes Den
Contact:

Re: Republic Government & Parties

Post by Kitsune »

Symmetry wrote: Just use some other system for electing the president, and third parties will become more viable.
I am asking about it for my Star Trek: Rebellion story and trying to figure out how to set up the Republics government. The US Government seems like a good basis for the government but trying to figure out a way it does not become a two party system or if it is imevitable.
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine

"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
NapoleonGH
Jedi Master
Posts: 1090
Joined: 2002-07-08 02:25pm
Location: NJ, USA
Contact:

Post by NapoleonGH »

bah humbug, base it on the republican roman government, 2 chief executives to prevent 1 man from becoming despotic.
Festina Lente
My shoes are too tight and I've forgotten how to dance
Johonebesus
Jedi Master
Posts: 1487
Joined: 2002-07-06 11:26pm

Post by Johonebesus »

There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that necessitates or even encourages a two party system. In fact, our constitution was designed to ignore parties, or factions as Washington called them. Two parties emerged because for a long time politics was dominated by one major issue, first states rights vs. centralization, then the issue of slavery, which was closely related to the question of states rights. Britain had a similar situation, with the division between royalists and republicans, or conservatives and liberals. If your fictional state is not obsessed with one central question, then there is no reason why adopting the U.S. Constitution verbatim should necessarily give rise to a two party system. Most other republics have many parties. Ironically, their constitutions usually require that there be a majority control in the legislature. That is why some countries have to hold special elections whenever some issue gets too difficult. Such a system does encourage a two party system. In order for the government to function, there must be a majority party, or at least a willing coalition of parties. Our system, on the other hand, could function just fine with a dozen parties. Or at least having a Congress divided between several hostile factions would not cause a constitutional crisis, as it would for most republics.
"Can you eat quarks? Can you spread them on your bed when the cold weather comes?" -Bernard Levin

"Sir: Mr. Bernard Levin asks 'Can you eat quarks?' I estimate that he eats 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,001 quarks a day...Yours faithfully..." -Sir Alan Cottrell


Elohim's loving mercy: "Hey, you, don't turn around. WTF! I said DON'T tur- you know what, you're a pillar of salt now. Bitch." - an anonymous commenter
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

America naturally gravitated to a two-party system because the Presidency is not responsible to Congress and is a very powerful office, even in the bare-bones Federal system that existed in the early days of the republic. Presidential elections are winner-takes-all propositions, and it makes the most sense for those with allied interests to form the broadest possible coalition to elect him. These coalitions formalized very early, and once Washington stepped down, the two-party system basically crystalized. It's telling that while there have been periods where the U.S. was a one-party nation (following the collapse of one of the major parties), there's never been a point where it's been a three or more party nation--even the Progressives never really had a chance, not even when they nominated the same candidate as the Democrats. The election of 1860 is the only real exception, and that was a very screwed up situation where you had the Democrats split and whoever was left who still thought the Union could be preserved by compromise forming their own party, which vanished afterwards.

As for avoiding the two-party system: weakening the Presidency or making his election a matter for Congress would probably do it. Without a major nationwide election every four years, there's less reason for broad based parties to exist. CHanging the voting system from plurality to, say, party-list voting would have a big effect, too. You're still going to see a few parties dominate national politics, though, unless the political situation is unstable for some reason (Russia in the 1990's is a good example, where every election cycle would see half a dozen new parties come out of nowhere, only to vanish in a few years).
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Durandal
Bile-Driven Hate Machine
Posts: 17927
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Post by Durandal »

Moved to N&P.
Damien Sorresso

"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
User avatar
Stuart Mackey
Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
Posts: 5946
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Republic Government & Parties

Post by Stuart Mackey »

Kitsune wrote:
Symmetry wrote: Just use some other system for electing the president, and third parties will become more viable.
I am asking about it for my Star Trek: Rebellion story and trying to figure out how to set up the Republics government. The US Government seems like a good basis for the government but trying to figure out a way it does not become a two party system or if it is imevitable.
It all depends on how you set up your voting system and your constituion.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"

Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
Post Reply