Republic Government & Parties
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
Republic Government & Parties
Does anyone know how a government based on the Us Constitution could be formed and keep out the two party system which seems to be immovable?
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
- The Cleric
- BANNED
- Posts: 2990
- Joined: 2003-08-06 09:41pm
- Location: The Right Hand Of GOD
There will never be a successful third party. The Democrats or Republicans will always win; however, they may have ideology changes that align them more with some third party ideals.
{} Thrawn wins. Any questions? {} Great Dolphin Conspiracy {} Proud member of the defunct SEGNOR {} Enjoy the rythmic hip thrusts {} In my past life I was either Vlad the Impaler or Katsushika Hokusai {}
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: 2002-07-08 02:25pm
- Location: NJ, USA
- Contact:
there have been temporarily succcessful third parties that have gotten a few members into congress in the past, like the Populists in the late 19th century. There is a possibility for a third party to garner a fair amount of the seats in congress, but only if people became disillusioned with the dems or republicans, which can very well happen in the near future.
Festina Lente
My shoes are too tight and I've forgotten how to dance
My shoes are too tight and I've forgotten how to dance
Not quite true, there have been periods of multiple parties or one party, but they don't last long before falling back into two-party stability. I can imagine events that would turn the Republicans or Democrats into regional parties, and let some other national third party (reform, green or libertarian probably) take over the opposition.StormTrooperTR889 wrote:There will never be a successful third party. The Democrats or Republicans will always win; however, they may have ideology changes that align them more with some third party ideals.
SDN Rangers: Gunnery Officer
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
Its more complex than that. It was the Federalists vs. the Democratic Republicans until the war of 1812, when the Feds seemed to be unpatriotic and became a New England only party. After that the Democratic Republicans split into two parties.NapoleonGH wrote:there have been temporarily succcessful third parties that have gotten a few members into congress in the past, like the Populists in the late 19th century. There is a possibility for a third party to garner a fair amount of the seats in congress, but only if people became disillusioned with the dems or republicans, which can very well happen in the near future.
SDN Rangers: Gunnery Officer
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
Re: Republic Government & Parties
Just use some other system for electing the president, and third parties will become more viable.Kitsune wrote:Does anyone know how a government based on the Us Constitution could be formed and keep out the two party system which seems to be immovable?
SDN Rangers: Gunnery Officer
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
Re: Republic Government & Parties
I am asking about it for my Star Trek: Rebellion story and trying to figure out how to set up the Republics government. The US Government seems like a good basis for the government but trying to figure out a way it does not become a two party system or if it is imevitable.Symmetry wrote: Just use some other system for electing the president, and third parties will become more viable.
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
Thomas Paine
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten."
Ecclesiastes 9:5 (KJV)
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: 2002-07-08 02:25pm
- Location: NJ, USA
- Contact:
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: 2002-07-06 11:26pm
There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that necessitates or even encourages a two party system. In fact, our constitution was designed to ignore parties, or factions as Washington called them. Two parties emerged because for a long time politics was dominated by one major issue, first states rights vs. centralization, then the issue of slavery, which was closely related to the question of states rights. Britain had a similar situation, with the division between royalists and republicans, or conservatives and liberals. If your fictional state is not obsessed with one central question, then there is no reason why adopting the U.S. Constitution verbatim should necessarily give rise to a two party system. Most other republics have many parties. Ironically, their constitutions usually require that there be a majority control in the legislature. That is why some countries have to hold special elections whenever some issue gets too difficult. Such a system does encourage a two party system. In order for the government to function, there must be a majority party, or at least a willing coalition of parties. Our system, on the other hand, could function just fine with a dozen parties. Or at least having a Congress divided between several hostile factions would not cause a constitutional crisis, as it would for most republics.
"Can you eat quarks? Can you spread them on your bed when the cold weather comes?" -Bernard Levin
"Sir: Mr. Bernard Levin asks 'Can you eat quarks?' I estimate that he eats 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,001 quarks a day...Yours faithfully..." -Sir Alan Cottrell
Elohim's loving mercy: "Hey, you, don't turn around. WTF! I said DON'T tur- you know what, you're a pillar of salt now. Bitch." - an anonymous commenter
"Sir: Mr. Bernard Levin asks 'Can you eat quarks?' I estimate that he eats 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,001 quarks a day...Yours faithfully..." -Sir Alan Cottrell
Elohim's loving mercy: "Hey, you, don't turn around. WTF! I said DON'T tur- you know what, you're a pillar of salt now. Bitch." - an anonymous commenter
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
America naturally gravitated to a two-party system because the Presidency is not responsible to Congress and is a very powerful office, even in the bare-bones Federal system that existed in the early days of the republic. Presidential elections are winner-takes-all propositions, and it makes the most sense for those with allied interests to form the broadest possible coalition to elect him. These coalitions formalized very early, and once Washington stepped down, the two-party system basically crystalized. It's telling that while there have been periods where the U.S. was a one-party nation (following the collapse of one of the major parties), there's never been a point where it's been a three or more party nation--even the Progressives never really had a chance, not even when they nominated the same candidate as the Democrats. The election of 1860 is the only real exception, and that was a very screwed up situation where you had the Democrats split and whoever was left who still thought the Union could be preserved by compromise forming their own party, which vanished afterwards.
As for avoiding the two-party system: weakening the Presidency or making his election a matter for Congress would probably do it. Without a major nationwide election every four years, there's less reason for broad based parties to exist. CHanging the voting system from plurality to, say, party-list voting would have a big effect, too. You're still going to see a few parties dominate national politics, though, unless the political situation is unstable for some reason (Russia in the 1990's is a good example, where every election cycle would see half a dozen new parties come out of nowhere, only to vanish in a few years).
As for avoiding the two-party system: weakening the Presidency or making his election a matter for Congress would probably do it. Without a major nationwide election every four years, there's less reason for broad based parties to exist. CHanging the voting system from plurality to, say, party-list voting would have a big effect, too. You're still going to see a few parties dominate national politics, though, unless the political situation is unstable for some reason (Russia in the 1990's is a good example, where every election cycle would see half a dozen new parties come out of nowhere, only to vanish in a few years).
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
- Stuart Mackey
- Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
- Posts: 5946
- Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Republic Government & Parties
It all depends on how you set up your voting system and your constituion.Kitsune wrote:I am asking about it for my Star Trek: Rebellion story and trying to figure out how to set up the Republics government. The US Government seems like a good basis for the government but trying to figure out a way it does not become a two party system or if it is imevitable.Symmetry wrote: Just use some other system for electing the president, and third parties will become more viable.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"
Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------