As stated, he's the only droid in existence capable of using the force.StarshipTitanic wrote: Explain this Skippy.
Unfortunaetly he's from the Star Wars Tales comics which would fall under the Infinities label.
Moderator: Vympel
I would say it will be first in this order:Drooling Iguana wrote:The chief engineers of each Star Trek series are each given identical damaged ships. The ships use technology significantly different from what's used is Star Trek and Star Wars, however each competitor is fully briefed on their operation, and given all the tools necessary to get the ships up and running. First one to get their engines up and running and reach a planet 1ly away wins.
An astromech droid will know what has to be done, and can use its welders and manipulators to get the job done unless you're just going to postulate that everything is really heavy and can't be moved without a lot of muscle power. Meanwhile, the Trek guys will be useless because they don't understand anything that's not basically similar to their technology base.Elim Garak wrote:An astromech droid won't be able to fix anything. Unless the alien ship is equipped with one of the droid sockets with which it is compatible, and its only problem is software, no-way, no-how. An astromech won't be able to get near most of the problems, will barely be able to lift any of the tools or parts with those pathetic manipulators. At very very best it might be able to weld some stuff together - it has no other purpose.
Nope, not everything. But some things are. Furthermore, I believe it has only one rudimentary manipulator, which appeared to be extremely weak. One manipulator with extremely small range of motion is not going to be enough.Darth Wong wrote:An astromech droid will know what has to be done, and can use its welders and manipulators to get the job done unless you're just going to postulate that everything is really heavy and can't be moved without a lot of muscle power.Elim Garak wrote:An astromech droid won't be able to fix anything. Unless the alien ship is equipped with one of the droid sockets with which it is compatible, and its only problem is software, no-way, no-how. An astromech won't be able to get near most of the problems, will barely be able to lift any of the tools or parts with those pathetic manipulators. At very very best it might be able to weld some stuff together - it has no other purpose.
Do you have proof that they won't be able to understand things? The initial idea was that they would be fully briefed.Meanwhile, the Trek guys will be useless because they don't understand anything that's not basically similar to their technology base.
That "really awful claw" was perfectly capable of fixing the Falcon's hyperdrive.Elim Garak wrote:Very few things in a modern device can be fixed with a welder and a really awful claw.
As Darth Servo already pointed out, R2-D2's built-in tools was perfectly fine at fixing the Falcon's sabotaged hyperdrive, as well as C-3PO (on two separate occasions). And as we (or at least, most of us) could tell from the original triology from many different occasions (when he was moving under water in TESB, and when all his tools popped up when he was shot in ROTJ), R2 has at least a dozen built-in tools which we don't normally see in action.Elim Garak wrote:For example, lets say it needs to repair an ST-type console. To do that it has to get underneath it to swap out a burned out isolinear chip - or some equivalent thereof, whatever technology it uses. It would have a lot of trouble even getting under the console, let alone getting its manipulator open access panels, carefully moving chips and small details, etc.
Of course. Anton's the Trekkie who made a fool of himself in the R2 vs. Exocomps arguments on ASVS.Ender wrote:So according to Polinger here, despite having a multitude of tools built in and at his disposal, all R2 will use is his arc welder and manipulator arm.
Anyone else see a problem with this?
1. The rockets are capable of more than zero-g manouvering.The Kernel wrote:Null the artificial gravity then use its zero-g rockets.GrandAdmiralPrawn wrote:Sorry, but Trekkie-boy is right. How's the R2 unit going to open a panel that's five feet up the wall?
Are you suggesting that there isn't a control interface for the gravity? Besides, R2D2 could simply forcibly disable the power to the gravity if worse comes to worse and then repair it later. His rockets were obviously designed for zero-g manuvering anyways, so he'd be better off without gravity.Matt Huang wrote: 1. The rockets are capable of more than zero-g manouvering.
2. How would it kill the gravity on a starship that has no place for R2 to efficently and effectively interface with any controls? R2 can't magically poke it's dataprobe into an isolinear chip or bio-neural gel pack and suddenly have full access to the environmental controls.
Even if his dataprobe could not, who is to say he could not hot hire into the system to interface with it, or scrap some crud device that can do the job. If the alien ship had some exotic dataport, then there must be some gadgets in the wreckage that could operate with it. All R2 needs to do is find one. If anything, he have a better idea on how tro access the system.Matt Huang wrote:1. The rockets are capable of more than zero-g manouvering.The Kernel wrote:Null the artificial gravity then use its zero-g rockets.GrandAdmiralPrawn wrote:Sorry, but Trekkie-boy is right. How's the R2 unit going to open a panel that's five feet up the wall?
2. How would it kill the gravity on a starship that has no place for R2 to efficently and effectively interface with any controls? R2 can't magically poke it's dataprobe into an isolinear chip or bio-neural gel pack and suddenly have full access to the environmental controls.
I believe that it was Obi-wan's fighter that sent the transmission not the driod, that his fighter managed to do so by commandeering the local communications network, and that the transmission was via hyperwave, not subspace.Rhoades wrote:In AotC, the R-type astromech droid that accompianed Obi-Wan had the ability to send communications from Genosis to Coruscant. Isn't that an example subspace technology?Matt Huang wrote:I'm no expert on SW tech, but I don't seem to recall that R2 possessed a subspace tranciever.
That's true; R2D2 had no subspace transmitter in Heir to the Empire when Luke got stranded after a run in with Thrawn. However, that just means he has no long range transmitter, it doesn't mean he can't pick up local signals (which is an obvious feature to add to such a droid).Matt Huang wrote: I believe that it was Obi-wan's fighter that sent the transmission not the driod, that his fighter managed to do so by commandeering the local communications network, and that the transmission was via hyperwave, not subspace.
Without subspace com, how would R2 manage to hack into the borg subspace networks? (Note: it doesn't matter if R2 can send messages via hyperwave or any other method besides subspace, the borg are explicitly stated to use subspace networks)The Kernel wrote:That's true; R2D2 had no subspace transmitter in Heir to the Empire when Luke got stranded after a run in with Thrawn. However, that just means he has no long range transmitter, it doesn't mean he can't pick up local signals (which is an obvious feature to add to such a droid).Matt Huang wrote: I believe that it was Obi-wan's fighter that sent the transmission not the driod, that his fighter managed to do so by commandeering the local communications network, and that the transmission was via hyperwave, not subspace.
And would SW subspace happen to be the same thing as ST subspace? The properties of ST subspace have been well explored, but ST subspace (to my knowledge here) is not the same thing as SW subspace.SirNitram wrote:If HttE only rules out long range, Subspace is still an option. Subspace comms have been in use in the Empire for tens of thousands of years..
Please show whatever evidence you have for them being completely different entities.Matt Huang wrote:And would SW subspace happen to be the same thing as ST subspace? The properties of ST subspace have been well explored, but ST subspace (to my knowledge here) is not the same thing as SW subspace.SirNitram wrote:If HttE only rules out long range, Subspace is still an option. Subspace comms have been in use in the Empire for tens of thousands of years..
ST Subspace:SirNitram wrote:Please show whatever evidence you have for them being completely different entities.Matt Huang wrote:And would SW subspace happen to be the same thing as ST subspace? The properties of ST subspace have been well explored, but ST subspace (to my knowledge here) is not the same thing as SW subspace.SirNitram wrote:If HttE only rules out long range, Subspace is still an option. Subspace comms have been in use in the Empire for tens of thousands of years..
If ST subspace interacts with normal space of it's own accord and SW doesn't, that's all I need to distinguish between the two.SirNitram wrote:And what among this indicates they are different? All you've shown is that ST uses Subspace more. Not surprising: SW used it tens of thousands of years ago.
It should be noted, however, subspace is used for both sensors and communications in the mid-ranges.