I forgot the source, but he also mentioned that Arthur was a myth of England, and he wanted to write a myth for the "English speaking".Vendetta wrote:Mostly he was annoyed about the influence of the French romantic tradition. (King Arthur, as seen in legend, is entirely a creation of twelfth century France)
Nordic and Anglo Saxon myths are the ones he drew upon to create Arda, it's people, and it's storytelling style..
My thoughts of the ROTK movie:
Story: Besides the messy beginning, it was handled great.
Characters: Built great, Arwen was, well, I considered her an extra.
Battles: Very well done, unfortunately the atmosphere seemed to be built weaker than Helm's Deep. Helm's Deep made me concern of the battle, the both battles in ROTK didn't, though I liked the Rohirrim charging (which might hint the reason of my thoughts on ROTK, probably.)
Minas Tirith: A big hand to the visuals, the whole trilogy constructed lots of amazing locations, and the final big meal is Minas Tirith.
Ending: For a movie it was handled not so good since it "ended" here and there (Coronation, stop, Narration, stop, Frodo and friends toasting, stop, Sam's wedding, stop, Frodo finishing his book, stop, off to the West, phew!) , for the big picture it might be better. It was said that PJ originally let Cate Blanchette (sp) narrate the ending after the Coronation. I'd prefer something like that for this film and leave the long ending for the EE.
Other unforgettable scenes:
Lighting the beacon (Question: Why were there beacons at the seaside? I thought between Rohan and Gondor was only mountains.)
Sam and Frodo struggling up to Mt. Doom.
Joke:
Oliphants taken down in AT-AT fashion (Legolas = Luke, Eowyn = Wedge)