http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/2002/
This year it looks like in the absence of worthy contemporary research, they've had to give away the Nobel Physics prize to decades-old research. It does strike me as if they want to give the prizes to these fellas before they kick the bucket. This stuff is so old that I've sort of taken for granted the existence of neutrinos and cosmic x-rays. Oh well, Einstein did have to wait 15 years for his Nobel as well.
KG
ps any other physicists around here?
Physics Nobel Prize 2002
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- kheegster
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: 2002-09-14 02:29am
- Location: An oasis in the wastelands of NJ
Physics Nobel Prize 2002
Articles, opinions and rants from an astrophysicist: Cosmic Journeys
Re: Physics Nobel Prize 2002
nobel prizes are often given for "decades old research" rather than recent stuff, because very often the importance of the original work is only realised after recent advancements.kheegan wrote:http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/2002/
This year it looks like in the absence of worthy contemporary research, they've had to give away the Nobel Physics prize to decades-old research.
It took 20 years for Lev Landau to be recognised for his work on quantum fluids
Most of the work that won Chandreskhar the prize in 83 was from the 20's/30's, and it was only due to advances by other (now probably more famous) physicists in the late 70s that people realised his work was truly deserving of recognition (one of the few physicists awarded the prize postumhously IIRC)
It doesn't matter how old the research is - if it's important why not recognise it as such? This year's nobel laureates did work that has been key in several major physics advancements in recent years. They just did it a few years before people were capable of realising what it meant.
-
- Youngling
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 2002-07-19 11:05pm
- Location: Somewhere in Arizona
- kheegster
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: 2002-09-14 02:29am
- Location: An oasis in the wastelands of NJ
I'm only a first year physics undergrad myself...I meant physicist in the more general meaning.
I wasn't really criticising the late awardance of the Nobel Prizes, just more concerned that such delays might mean some discoveries might go unrewarded because their discoverers have passed away. Then they would not be around to enjoy the recognition.
I wonder when Stephen Hawking will get his Nobel...I'm not sure he has that many years left. Most of the scientific community is in agreement that most of his work is valid, although not verifiable by experiment. Probably the committee is too nervous about awarding a prize that might later be debunked.
KG
I wasn't really criticising the late awardance of the Nobel Prizes, just more concerned that such delays might mean some discoveries might go unrewarded because their discoverers have passed away. Then they would not be around to enjoy the recognition.
I wonder when Stephen Hawking will get his Nobel...I'm not sure he has that many years left. Most of the scientific community is in agreement that most of his work is valid, although not verifiable by experiment. Probably the committee is too nervous about awarding a prize that might later be debunked.
KG
Articles, opinions and rants from an astrophysicist: Cosmic Journeys
-
- What Kind of Username is That?
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: 2002-07-10 08:53pm
- Location: Back in PA