Piercings...

Lord Pounder · Post by **Lord Pounder** » 2004-01-02 06:03am

I'm a bit of a hippocrite when it comes to piercings. I am turned on like nothing else by the sight of a tonned tummy with a belly button ring and i love the nipple piercing Justin from The Darkness has but i can't stand the thought of getting a piercing myself.

Zac Naloen · Post by **Zac Naloen** » 2004-01-02 09:36am

naval piercings are really sexy on girls imho...

and i REALLY want to get my eyebrow done...

gonna have to do it when i go to uni i think...

Lord Pounder · Post by **Lord Pounder** » 2004-01-02 09:58am

I like the idea of a eyebrow piercing, but I wear glasses and it'd look crap. I knew a guy who had his ball bag pierced, but he was a bit mentaly unhinged.

Sir Sirius · Post by **Sir Sirius** » 2004-01-02 10:15am

I don't have any experience in sex (of any kind) with piercings, but piercings just gross me out in general, I don't even like earrings.

aerius · Post by **aerius** » 2004-01-02 12:57pm

Oral & genital piercings are not my thing. I don't have them myself but I've slept with chicks who do. It just doesn't feel right to me but one of my friends thinks they're the best thing ever. Earings on chicks are quite enough for me.

The Aliens · Post by **The Aliens** » 2004-01-02 01:01pm

All natural, thank you very much.

Robert Walper · Post by **Robert Walper** » 2004-01-02 01:19pm

<rant>I find piercings completely disgusting. It's a form of self mutulation, from minor to excessive. I see absolutely nothing attractive about them at all. It's just an extension of the moronic human tendency to find shiny things desireable, like rocks and shit. The more piercings and other similar idiotic fads I see, the less hope I hold for humanity redeeming itself.</rant>

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2004-01-02 02:01pm

It's not self-mutilation, it's using the body as art. It's not harmful, ergo not mutilation, so STFU.

I've never slept with someone with a genital piercing, but I have snogged peeps with tongue piercings and labrets, and IMO they don't do any harm at all

but they're not going to turn a shit kisser into Don Juan. technique is still everything.

The next piercing I get will probably be a genital one, but only when I have an SO, and only if that SO agrees.

Dahak · Post by **Dahak** » 2004-01-02 02:19pm

No, thanks...
I prefer my bodily integrity intact

TrailerParkJawa · Post by **TrailerParkJawa** » 2004-01-02 02:24pm

Im fine with plain old earings.
Peircings down under are not my thing.

Post by **Rob Wilson** » 2004-01-02 02:31pm

I'vew already said that I find Piercings superfluous, and can't imagine how piercing your gentitals can make it more pleasurable to have sex.

I've kissed girls with tongue studs, and to be honest, it does nothing for me 'Oh look, a bit of metal, how... unwanted.' Seriously, it does nothing for the kissing experience except add the presence of a ball-bearing. For the piercee however it's supposed to add a new feeling (the stud pulling about through your tongue) whether this is a good thing I leave upto personal preference.

Genital piercings are a mixed bag, you talk to some guys and they say it does nothing whatsoever for themand infact lessens sexual pleasure, but adds to the girls stimulation. Then you get the blowhards that say it increases sexual pleasure... a fair number of these are also confirmed Masochists in sexual orientation, so it could be the pain, or lessening of sexual pleasure from the piercing makes them cum more - most of the rest seem to just be saying it's better because they don't want to admit it doesn't, and couldn't care less that it could increase the ladies pleasure.

Clit piercings... well it makes it easier for virgin males to find the clit, but you generally have to work around it to stimulate the clit itself (pulling hard on it with your teeth is not recommended unless she is a serious masochist - this is not a nipple ring, there's not a lot of material there to hold it in place). Gentle teasing can produceorgasms if you want her to cum quick, but multiple Orgasms and deep orgasms don't seem to be on the menu (but I've only slept with two women with piecred clits so, not exactly a broad scientific survey

).

Basically, if you think it'll be a nice thing to have (remembering that a septic belly button or nipple are not turn-ons) then go for it. But be prepared for the fact that the claims of Sexual increase made by others might not happen for you.

If you get your lip pierced don't put in a White gold or pearl stud, they just look like a huge unburst zit.

Oh and once more - Spikes! Just why, for crying out loud, why?!

The Cleric · Post by **The Cleric** » 2004-01-02 02:34pm

I once again stand in awe of your sexual prowess.

Post by **Rob Wilson** » 2004-01-02 02:36pm

StormTrooperTR889 wrote:I once again stand in awe of your sexual prowess.

Whose? Mine? It's just two women with Pierced Clits, doubtless a few people can top that number easily.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-01-02 04:50pm

Robert Walper wrote:I find piercings completely disgusting. It's a form of self mutilation, from minor to excessive.

"Young man, the school dress code specifically forbids earrings unless you're of Yuuzhan Vong obstraction!"

Robert Walper · Post by **Robert Walper** » 2004-01-02 06:13pm

InnerBrat wrote:It's not self-mutilation, it's using the body as art.

Punching holes into the human body and sticking metal through them is mutulation.

It's not harmful, ergo not mutilation, so STFU.

Actually, it is harmful. At what point did you determine that forcibly putting holes into you body is not a harmful act? You may willingly submit to it, but unless your pain receptors are not functioning right, it hurts, and when you body hurts, it's telling you it does not like what is happening. Pain receptors exist for a reason, and there is a reason any behavior or actions that stimulates them is normally avoided and should be avoided.

I've never slept with someone with a genital piercing, but I have snogged peeps with tongue piercings and labrets, and IMO they don't do any harm at all

This isn't about harm to society or any harm to myself. I couldn't care less if they were sawing their arms off and calling it "art". The fact of the matter is the human body is being damaged intentionally, and natural body reactions to said intrusions clearly indicate it is not a good thing.

but they're not going to turn a shit kisser into Don Juan. technique is still everything.

My opinion has nothing to do with activities of said people. It's the simply the fact they have forcibly put holes in their body. They call it art, I call it self mutilation.

The next piercing I get will probably be a genital one, but only when I have an SO, and only if that SO agrees.

Hey, I'm not one to stand in anyone's way on what they want to do to their body. I wouldn't even if I have the opporuntinity. The most I would do is explain why I think it's not a good idea, but in the end it's their decision, not mine. However, I still call it self mutulation, regardless whether or not you insist it is "art".

Robert Walper · Post by **Robert Walper** » 2004-01-02 06:15pm

Peregrin Toker wrote:
Robert Walper wrote:I find piercings completely disgusting. It's a form of self mutilation, from minor to excessive.
"Young man, the school dress code specifically forbids earrings unless you're of Yuuzhan Vong obstraction!"

Don't confuse my dislike for the concept as an implication I feel I have the right to forbid or interfere with it.

Post by **Rob Wilson** » 2004-01-02 06:47pm

Peregrin Toker wrote:
Robert Walper wrote:I find piercings completely disgusting. It's a form of self mutilation, from minor to excessive.
"Young man, the school dress code specifically forbids earrings unless you're of Yuuzhan Vong obstraction!"

FUUUUUUUUUQ!

Though that should be Ex, not Ob. Mind if i change that when I nominate it to Dalton?

aphexmonster · Post by **aphexmonster** » 2004-01-02 08:51pm

i think piercings are so cute

Dorsk 81 · Post by **Dorsk 81** » 2004-01-03 12:32am

Robert Walper wrote:Punching holes into the human body and sticking metal through them is mutulation.

Apparently the PC term now is body modification. Body Mods include (as far as I know): Piercings, Scaring (I don't mean the people who scar themselves, but you can have it done professionaly). flesh tubes, plastic surgery and erm....I think theres one more called suspession or something.

Actually, it is harmful. At what point did you determine that forcibly putting holes into you body is not a harmful act? You may willingly submit to it, but unless your pain receptors are not functioning right, it hurts, and when you body hurts, it's telling you it does not like what is happening. Pain receptors exist for a reason, and there is a reason any behavior or actions that stimulates them is normally avoided and should be avoided.

I put that down to confilct in your brain (or whatever). Pain receptors say "bad! Ah no!" but your conscious self says "this looks nice".

This isn't about harm to society or any harm to myself. I couldn't care less if they were sawing their arms off and calling it "art". The fact of the matter is the human body is being damaged intentionally, and natural body reactions to said intrusions clearly indicate it is not a good thing.

Some people see the body as a sort of empty canvass and like to decorate it I suppose, like I do. It's not about being different, because I know I'm not, I just think I look better.

My opinion has nothing to do with activities of said people. It's the simply the fact they have forcibly put holes in their body. They call it art, I call it self mutilation.

Do you call people such a Dameon Herst who use the bodys of sheep in their work mutilators?

Hey, I'm not one to stand in anyone's way on what they want to do to their body. I wouldn't even if I have the opporuntinity. The most I would do is explain why I think it's not a good idea, but in the end it's their decision, not mine. However, I still call it self mutulation, regardless whether or not you insist it is "art".

Your opinion is noted. I don't go around shoving my piercings in peoples faces, if people want to stare let them.
Personaly I think "mutilation" is a bit of a harsh word, I think of car crashes and train wrecks when I hear mutilations. I think of piercings as a modification or an extra to ehat you normaly would be.

Post by **Rob Wilson** » 2004-01-03 12:43am

Dorsk 81 wrote:
Apparently the PC term now is body modification. Body Mods include (as far as I know): Piercings, Scaring (I don't mean the people who scar themselves, but you can have it done professionaly).

People pay someone to scar them?

Fucking retards.

Dorsk 81 wrote:Do you call people such a Dameon Herst who use the bodys of sheep in their work mutilators?

No, I call him a self-promoting waste of space. But considering he did cut dead animals in half, rather than chop bits off or push things through live ones - he's technically a carver or butcher, not a mutilator.

Dorsk 81 · Post by **Dorsk 81** » 2004-01-03 01:06am

Rob Wilson wrote:
Dorsk 81 wrote:
Apparently the PC term now is body modification. Body Mods include (as far as I know): Piercings, Scaring (I don't mean the people who scar themselves, but you can have it done professionaly).
People pay someone to scar them? Fucking retards.

Yea, they just look like bad sunburn.

No, I call him a self-promoting waste of space. But considering he did cut dead animals in half, rather than chop bits off or push things through live ones - he's technically a carver or butcher, not a mutilator.

Exactly, look out for art works at your local butchers, they could be worth a fortue some day...

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2004-01-03 03:34am

Piercings of any kind just wouldn't look right on me. It has to match your wardrobe and hairstyle, I guess. Of course, I don't mind, as I have no plans to get piercings.

I find ear and navel piercings good on girls, though. I wouldn't consider it hypocrisy in cases like this, as they are a member of the opposite gender, and what looks good on the genders is two different things, in my opinion.

Post by **Dalton** » 2004-01-03 11:18am

Not a big fan of body piercing; I find it superfluous and unattractive, especially tongue piercings. I do like women with earrings, though. Four or five in each ear is about my limit there, however.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2004-01-03 12:19pm

Robert Walper wrote:Punching holes into the human body and sticking metal through them is mutulation.

In your opinion.

Actually, it is harmful. At what point did you determine that forcibly putting holes into you body is not a harmful act?

At the point where a hole in my earlobe/nostril/labia does not in anyway hinder the functionality of my ear/nose/fanny, or affect my health or quality of life.

You may willingly submit to it, but unless your pain receptors are not functioning right, it hurts, and when you body hurts, it's telling you it does not like what is happening. Pain receptors exist for a reason, and there is a reason any behavior or actions that stimulates them is normally avoided and should be avoided.

According to this logic, I shouldn't be having sex, eating chilli, or applie antiseptic to my wounds.

I suppose electronically tagging a dog is mutilation, then?

I've never slept with someone with a genital piercing, but I have snogged peeps with tongue piercings and labrets, and IMO they don't do any harm at all
This isn't about harm to society or any harm to myself.

No, it's about the quality of a kiss...

I couldn't care less if they were sawing their arms off and calling it "art".

except that wasn't the point in question. An amputee cannot give a handjob, so clearly it does affect the quality of such

The fact of the matter is the human body is being damaged intentionally, and natural body reactions to said intrusions clearly indicate it is not a good thing.

Show what you mean by damage

My opinion has nothing to do with activities of said people. It's the simply the fact they have forcibly put holes in their body. They call it art, I call it self mutilation.

So you would outright refuse to kiss/sleep with someone with a piercing?

Hey, I'm not one to stand in anyone's way on what they want to do to their body. I wouldn't even if I have the opporuntinity. The most I would do is explain why I think it's not a good idea, but in the end it's their decision, not mine. However, I still call it self mutulation, regardless whether or not you insist it is "art".

Pay attention. My post addressed two distinct points. Your accustion that I am an idiotic self-harmer, and the OP, which asked whether oral or genital piercings affected sexual experience.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-01-03 12:31pm

InnerBrat wrote:I suppose electronically tagging a dog is mutilation, then?

Not to nitpick, but when you microchip a dog, it heals over with no apparent permanent damage. Many piercings are more like the "body modifications" used for centuries in Africa, which tend to create permanent damage and never really heal over.

Anyway, piercing does fit the dictionary definition of "mutilation". You are objecting to it because of its emotional connotations.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Piercings...

Piercings and sex?