A Star Wars ship in place on Voyager

SWvST: the subject of the main site.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Lancer
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3957
Joined: 2003-12-17 06:06pm
Location: Maryland

Re: A Star Wars ship in place on Voyager

Post by Lancer »

Darth Wong wrote:
Matt Huang wrote:You mean including all the time-travel related episodes (year of hell especially?). To beat the Year of Hell ship protected by what are pretty much STGOD universe-shields with just firepower (no technological miracles, since SW doesn't seem to pull them off on a regular basis), you'd pretty much need a Q onboard.
Please describe precisely what happened, why an Imperial ship would get involved in the first place, and why we should ignore the probability that such time-travel incidents are really just jumping from timeline to timeline rather than altering a single timeline.
They'd run out of fuel before reaching borg space, ST has so many spacial anomalies that hyperdrive would be useless, they'd be running into "mass shadows" from what were plot-device anomaly-related gravwells every hundred ly or so.
That's the dumbest fucking thing I've heard in a long time. Does it ever occur to you that they only run into these anomalies because they actively go looking for them, and change course whenever they pick one up on sensors because they want to "investigate"? If you have some evidence that the mean free path to avoid anomalous invisible solar-sized gravity wells in Trek space is as ridiculously short as you say, then please present it.
Calm down, it was my attempt to humourously reflect the "here there be monsters" quote that is on Daltonator's website:

http://www.daltonator.net/fuq/q.php?id=184
User avatar
Techno_Union
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 2003-11-26 08:02pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Techno_Union »

Can anybody tell me what consumable refer to? Is it only foor or is it anything like food and medical supplies.
Proud member of GALE Force.
User avatar
Techno_Union
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 2003-11-26 08:02pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Techno_Union »

Techno_Union wrote:Can anybody tell me what consumable refer to? Is it only foor or is it anything like food and medical supplies.
I screwed up, I meant does consumables refer to food, or is it fuel and other things like medical supplies too?
Proud member of GALE Force.
User avatar
jegs2
Imperial Spook
Posts: 4782
Joined: 2002-08-22 06:23pm
Location: Alabama

Post by jegs2 »

darthdavid wrote:I'd say anything correlian corvette or bigger could do it.
I was also thinking of a correlian corvette. They're about the same size, right?
John 3:16-18
Warwolves G2
The University of North Alabama Lions!
User avatar
Techno_Union
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 2003-11-26 08:02pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Techno_Union »

Voyager is 344 meters. Correlian Corvette is 150 meters. A nebulon B frigate would be better becuase it is 300 meters
Proud member of GALE Force.
User avatar
SPOOFE
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3174
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:34pm
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Contact:

Post by SPOOFE »

Well, remember that the Nebulon-B transcends 3-dimensional space... apparently, it's bigger on the inside than it is on the outside. That's how it magically has space for two squadrons of fighters.
The Great and Malignant
User avatar
Techno_Union
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 2003-11-26 08:02pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Techno_Union »

SPOOFE wrote:Well, remember that the Nebulon-B transcends 3-dimensional space... apparently, it's bigger on the inside than it is on the outside. That's how it magically has space for two squadrons of fighters.
It is bigger on the inside and capable of holding those fighters because of how much space was cleared out. Not to mention that it already had 2 hangers before adding the huge one in the aft part.
Proud member of GALE Force.
User avatar
Mad
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
Location: North Carolina, USA
Contact:

Post by Mad »

Techno_Union wrote:About the fuel, it was my understanding that the consumables aboard an Imperial ship (even though it is food), also includes the fuel. The fuel is also being "consumed" in a manner of speaking. But if you have Starships of the Galaxy then it tells you the consumables of some SW ships. For instance, and Imp I and II have a 6 year supply of consumables. So feul may not be that big of a problem.
Even if an typical Imperial warship has enough fuel for 6 years of normal operation, keep in mind that this scenario is trying to get the ship to enter and exit hyperspace quite often, and each transition requires a vast amount of fuel. This is probably much more often than a typical warship would use hyperspace. Combat also uses up fuel, and most places in the galaxy aren't hotspots. (Which is probably another reason the Rebel pilots usually had much more combat experience than the Imperial pilots they encountered.) Fuel would be the only problem if you slow down the hyperdrive.

In theory, even if the ship is given a slower hyperspace drive, the starship should just need to get maps of the galaxy, and once that's accomplished, enter the course and stay in hyperspace the entire time. It'll avoid combat that way and greatly reduce fuel usage.
Later...
User avatar
Techno_Union
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 2003-11-26 08:02pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Techno_Union »

While that may be true, Imperial Star Destroyers are meant for war and their onboard fuel supply is probably meant for quick jumps and multiple hyper jumps and exits along with battles. But they would use fuel a lot but not as much as you might think.
Proud member of GALE Force.
User avatar
Lancer
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3957
Joined: 2003-12-17 06:06pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Lancer »

Techno_Union wrote:
SPOOFE wrote:Well, remember that the Nebulon-B transcends 3-dimensional space... apparently, it's bigger on the inside than it is on the outside. That's how it magically has space for two squadrons of fighters.
It is bigger on the inside and capable of holding those fighters because of how much space was cleared out. Not to mention that it already had 2 hangers before adding the huge one in the aft part.
At least they don't have a bottomless pit on a deck that magically exists below the bottom surface of the ship's hull.
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

Matt Huang wrote:
Techno_Union wrote:
SPOOFE wrote:Well, remember that the Nebulon-B transcends 3-dimensional space... apparently, it's bigger on the inside than it is on the outside. That's how it magically has space for two squadrons of fighters.
It is bigger on the inside and capable of holding those fighters because of how much space was cleared out. Not to mention that it already had 2 hangers before adding the huge one in the aft part.
At least they don't have a bottomless pit on a deck that magically exists below the bottom surface of the ship's hull.
It's called the secondary hanger.
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
Techno_Union
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 2003-11-26 08:02pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Techno_Union »

It's called the secondary hanger.
What is?
Proud member of GALE Force.
User avatar
Lancer
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3957
Joined: 2003-12-17 06:06pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Lancer »

YT300000 wrote:
Matt Huang wrote:
Techno_Union wrote: It is bigger on the inside and capable of holding those fighters because of how much space was cleared out. Not to mention that it already had 2 hangers before adding the huge one in the aft part.
At least they don't have a bottomless pit on a deck that magically exists below the bottom surface of the ship's hull.
It's called the secondary hanger.
I was referring to Nemisis.
User avatar
Techno_Union
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 2003-11-26 08:02pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Techno_Union »

Oh ok, it through us off a little I think. Ha, very true. They screw up that ship in every movie.
Proud member of GALE Force.
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Post by Sarevok »

Techno_Union wrote:
SPOOFE wrote:Well, remember that the Nebulon-B transcends 3-dimensional space... apparently, it's bigger on the inside than it is on the outside. That's how it magically has space for two squadrons of fighters.
It is bigger on the inside and capable of holding those fighters because of how much space was cleared out. Not to mention that it already had 2 hangers before adding the huge one in the aft part.
The Nebulon - B is larger than a modern day aircraft carrier so it should have sufficient space for fighters.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

It is about the same length, but is a lot less volumnous. It also has lots of space taken up by engines, plus more of the space is not in a good shape for a hanger. Finally, Rebellion fighters are larger than US Navy ones.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Post by Slartibartfast »

I think it would be simpler to just pretend that some really stupid malfunction makes the hyperdrive work exactly as a warp drive unless it has hypermatter - which it won't find in the quadrant.

Who knows, maybe it's the way it works. Maybe not, but if it's a condition of the OP then it doesn't matter.
Image
User avatar
Andras
Jedi Knight
Posts: 575
Joined: 2002-07-08 10:27am
Location: Waldorf, MD

Post by Andras »

My vote is for a Carrack. In sublight, it's as fast as an X-wing, and it packs 10 Heavy TLs and 20 Ion Cannon( or laser cannon). It's a solid block of armor, as opposed to a Neb-B that's spindly and stalky, and doesn't have the exposed engines of a CRC.

350m long,
~1000 crew+142 troops,
4 recon TIEs for scouting
3500 tons cargo,
1 yr consumables

According to Starships of the Galaxy, Consumables only refers to the ability to support it's crew without resupply( food, etc)

The ICS books had range figures that were unrelated to food supply.
User avatar
Techno_Union
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 2003-11-26 08:02pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Techno_Union »

According to Starships of the Galaxy, Consumables only refers to the ability to support it's crew without resupply( food, etc)
I have the same book, so would that include fuel because it supports the crew. The carrak is a good choice, always one of my favs. Would it be to harsh to put in a dreadnought? Just a thought.
Proud member of GALE Force.
IRG CommandoJoe
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3481
Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm

Post by IRG CommandoJoe »

Fuel does not support the crew. It supports the ship. Medicine and foodstuffs would support the crew.
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi

"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith

Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
User avatar
Grand Moff Yenchin
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2730
Joined: 2003-02-07 12:49pm
Location: Surrounded by fundies who mock other fundies
Contact:

Post by Grand Moff Yenchin »

IRG CommandoJoe wrote:Fuel does not support the crew. It supports the ship. Medicine and foodstuffs would support the crew.
What about the power required for life support? Does it count as the support provided from fuel?
1st Plt. Comm. of the Warwolves
Member of Justice League
"People can't see Buddha so they say he doesn't have a body, since his body is formed of atoms, of course you can't see it. Saying he doesn't have a body is correct"- Li HongZhi
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Post by Slartibartfast »

In that case I would think only the minimal amount of fuel needed to run things like life support would count, but that would only confuse things.

I think it's mostly just food and clean underwear.
Image
User avatar
Andras
Jedi Knight
Posts: 575
Joined: 2002-07-08 10:27am
Location: Waldorf, MD

Post by Andras »

Consumables would also apply to the ships ability to maintain a breathable atmosphere, in addition to food and water stockpiles, at a full crew complement.

Cargo space would then be in addition to that.

The Carracks are able to enter an atmosphere, but I do not recall if they can land on a planet.


One more question, If the ship is restricted to 'warp' speeds, is that at cruise warp, or top end warp? IIRC, Voyager could have made it home in a decade, but couldn't sustain the speeds necessary. Does the ship still enter hyperspace? If so, that'll eliminate many encounters right off the bat.
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

Andras wrote:My vote is for a Carrack. In sublight, it's as fast as an X-wing, and it packs 10 Heavy TLs and 20 Ion Cannon( or laser cannon). It's a solid block of armor, as opposed to a Neb-B that's spindly and stalky, and doesn't have the exposed engines of a CRC.

350m long,
~1000 crew+142 troops,
4 recon TIEs for scouting
3500 tons cargo,
1 yr consumables

According to Starships of the Galaxy, Consumables only refers to the ability to support it's crew without resupply( food, etc)

The ICS books had range figures that were unrelated to food supply.
You sure they're heavies?
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
Andras
Jedi Knight
Posts: 575
Joined: 2002-07-08 10:27am
Location: Waldorf, MD

Post by Andras »

EGVV says Heavy's, WEG says Heavy's.

WEG rates them at 7d, which is the same as the Heavys on the ISD2 and the TL batteries on the DNs and Strikes; and are more powerful then the Quad TLs on a Victory.

Now, they could be low-gigaton Heavy TLs, instead of High Gigaton HTLs
Locked