December 29
Short Trip for Mercury Probe
A NASA spacecraft destined for Mercury has made its first trip, a 20-mile (32-kilometer) trek that pales before the eventual five-year voyage it is expected to make on the way to its target planet.
After almost four years of design, assembly and testing, researchers with the Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) at Johns Hopkins University in Laurel, Maryland shipped its Messenger spacecraft to the environmental testing facilities at NASA's nearby Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt. There, spacecraft is undergoing about 10 weeks of shakedown tests that will check its balance and alignment, simulate launch conditions, and subject it to the harsh temperatures it may experience near Mercury.
Messenger, an acronym for Mercury Surface and Space Environment, Geochemistry and Ranging, will be the first orbital mission to small Mercury, where the Sun shines 11 times brighter than it appears on Earth and daytime temperatures can surpass 800 degrees Fahrenheit (426 degrees Celsius). With seven science instruments, including a camera, laser altimeter, magnetometer and several spectrometers, Messenger is one of the most complex spacecraft ever built by APL, which will operate the craft during the NASA mission.
Project researchers hope the probe will shed light on the nature of Mercury's crust and thin atmosphere, as well as the makeup of its core and polar materials. In March, the spacecraft is due to be delivered to Kennedy Space Center in preparation for a May 2004 launch. Messenger is expected to swing past Mercury twice, first in 2007 and again in 2008, before entering orbit around the planet in 2009.
Mission to Mercury. Or: Double-yoo-tee-eff, Mate?
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
Mission to Mercury. Or: Double-yoo-tee-eff, Mate?
Space.com article
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
- The Cleric
- BANNED
- Posts: 2990
- Joined: 2003-08-06 09:41pm
- Location: The Right Hand Of GOD
What's wrong with it?
{} Thrawn wins. Any questions? {} Great Dolphin Conspiracy {} Proud member of the defunct SEGNOR {} Enjoy the rythmic hip thrusts {} In my past life I was either Vlad the Impaler or Katsushika Hokusai {}
I dunno...curiosity, maybe? Because they haven't before? Desire to learn something about the planet, perhaps? Why the hell not?Darth_Zod wrote:why send a probe to mercury? i'm sure there's more viable planets they could choose. or even asteroids for that matter. . . . .
This doesn't merit a WTF.
DPDarkPrimus is my boyfriend!
SDNW4 Nation: The Refuge And, on Nova Terra, Al-Stan the Totally and Completely Honest and Legitimate Weapons Dealer and Used Starship Salesman slept on a bed made of money, with a blaster under his pillow and his sombrero pulled over his face. This is to say, he slept very well indeed.
SDNW4 Nation: The Refuge And, on Nova Terra, Al-Stan the Totally and Completely Honest and Legitimate Weapons Dealer and Used Starship Salesman slept on a bed made of money, with a blaster under his pillow and his sombrero pulled over his face. This is to say, he slept very well indeed.
- Sarevok
- The Fearless One
- Posts: 10681
- Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
- Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
Well Mercury does have significant mineral resources which could be useful in the distant future if we colonize the solar system.
Personaly I believe NASA should suspend all exploratory missions for a few years and spend that money on the development of a space plane.
Personaly I believe NASA should suspend all exploratory missions for a few years and spend that money on the development of a space plane.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
- Burak Gazan
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: 2002-12-30 07:45pm
- Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
- Contact:
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
i'd definitely agree that putting the money towards a new shuttle or space plane would be more practical. instead of spending it on projects to explore planets with older tech. it's not like the planets are going anywhere anytime soon.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
- Sarevok
- The Fearless One
- Posts: 10681
- Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
- Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
Space exploration is useless if we cant ecnomicaly launch to orbit. Once a space plane becomes reality costs for all missions are going to come down drasticaly.Darth_Zod wrote:i'd definitely agree that putting the money towards a new shuttle or space plane would be more practical. instead of spending it on projects to explore planets with older tech. it's not like the planets are going anywhere anytime soon.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
The problem, however, is that spaceplanes are inherently more costly. They have horrible reentry systems, and a spaceplane does not jettison it's fuel tanks meaning that what fuel you do have will have to be able to push the entire fuel mass and ship into space. Staging reduces the costs of development, reduces the ship mass, and reduces the amount of fuel needed. I suspect the cost of a small tank is significantly less than the extra necessary fuel systems, and fuel, and potential dangers that come from using a spaceplane instead of a capsule design.evilcat4000 wrote:Space exploration is useless if we cant ecnomicaly launch to orbit. Once a space plane becomes reality costs for all missions are going to come down drasticaly.
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.