You left the blinker on.Wicked Pilot wrote:Behold, this is what I drive:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/t-37-98716.jpg
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Moderator: Edi
You left the blinker on.Wicked Pilot wrote:Behold, this is what I drive:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/t-37-98716.jpg
Well in that tradition: Vehicles I've been known to fly/drive/command/whatever, sorted by tech base (warning, rather long list):Vertigo1 wrote:My ride.
Seriously though, congrats. I'm not exactly a big fan of hondas (mostly due to the local ricers), but if you like it then more power to ya.
It's actually a 5.0L small-block. But it has Tuned Port Injection, a high-quality, high-performance camshaft (I don't have the box on me, so I forgot who the manufacturer was) and all the performance mods, so it actually beats the 350/5.7L at peak horsepower. (But not in acceleration; the 350 is a bit hotter off the line).Col. Crackpot wrote:I think i can hair faint echoes of Sister Christian by Nite Ranger coming from Crazy 9000'S IROC.Thats a 5.7L (chevy 350 block) right?
The trick with valve cover gaskets is that you have to cover them in high-grade RTV, or else the cork will disintegrate early. It's a little trade-off, but it's cheap if you don't mind getting your hands dirty.Chardok wrote:Of COURSE it's a 350! (If it's an IROC) I got a thing against 350's though...they're a dime a dozen, IMHO, and they fall apart easy, the water jackets clog with the slightest bit of nastiness, and don't even get me started on simple shit like valve cover gaskets.
That's bad, but I think Ford still takes the cake for sheer shittiness of engine design. Their mid-1980s V6 comes to mind. Also, there was a really nice design with some of their older engines where the exhaust tubes went THROUGH the water jacket...Chardok wrote:(I suppose i should mention, however, how ridiculous I find it that pontiac insists on using a goddamned PLASTIC intake manifold STILL on the 3800's in, at the very least Grand Prix and Bonnevilles.)