Orgasms 'at the touch of a button'

Trytostaydead · Post by **Trytostaydead** » 2004-01-16 12:41am

If this is true.. we men are screwed :-\

SeebianWurm · Post by **SeebianWurm** » 2004-01-16 12:43am

Sex change, here I come.

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2004-01-16 12:47am

Wasn't this posted before?

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2004-01-16 12:51am

I'll care when they make something to improve male orgasms.

kojikun · Post by **kojikun** » 2004-01-16 12:57am

i wonder if it would work if a guy used it..

Alex Moon · Post by **Alex Moon** » 2004-01-16 01:03am

closet sci-fi fan wrote:
neoolong wrote:Wasn't this posted before?
quick search for 'orgasm' doesn't come up with any similar topics. there's a slight possibility that it might have be in the archives though.

I think that someone posted an article about a similar device. That one required wires inserted near the woman's spine however.

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2004-01-16 01:04am

Yeah, it's old news. About the same device; this one requires electrodes applied to the sole of the foot, right?

Dorsk 81 · Post by **Dorsk 81** » 2004-01-16 01:31am

DPDarkPrimus wrote:I'll care when they make something to improve male orgasms.

You won't be saying that when you get a rich girlfriend who has everything except.....

Vertigo1 · Post by **Vertigo1** » 2004-01-16 02:54am

What's next....they actually make the FU-FME units?

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-01-16 10:35am

Nothing new - I think there's some sort of painkiller drug which causes an orgasm in the patient if he/she yawns...

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2004-01-16 10:38am

Until males are able to have multiple orgasms of increased effectiveness, I'm not interested.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2004-01-16 10:48am

Bollocks.

We have anecdotal evidence frrm one woman, who just happens to work for the company that makes it.

That'll change every woman's life all right

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2004-01-16 11:01am

InnerBrat wrote:Bollocks.

We have anecdotal evidence frrm one woman, who just happens to work for the company that makes it.

That'll change every woman's life all right

Are you disputing this fairly strong case of anecdotal evidence?

Everyone who reads/watches Dilbert knows anecdotal evidence is the best kind...

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2004-01-16 03:22pm

InnerBrat wrote:Bollocks.

We have anecdotal evidence frrm one woman, who just happens to work for the company that makes it.

That'll change every woman's life all right

But can we, by we I mean men, really take the chance that it's right.

Darth Garden Gnome · Post by **Darth Garden Gnome** » 2004-01-16 03:26pm

Slightest Touch: Making the XY chromosome obsolete since 2004.

SyntaxVorlon · Post by **SyntaxVorlon** » 2004-01-16 03:33pm

Well I'm screwed, or rather quite the opposite, if this gets under a few thousand.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-01-16 03:33pm

DPDarkPrimus wrote:I'll care when they make something to improve male orgasms.

It's called "Not Getting Circumcised."

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2004-01-16 05:32pm

Durandal wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:I'll care when they make something to improve male orgasms.
It's called "Not Getting Circumcised."

A decision which is, unfortunately, not one that we get to make.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2004-01-16 05:38pm

Durandal wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:I'll care when they make something to improve male orgasms.
It's called "Not Getting Circumcised."

How about something that people are able to actually choose?

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2004-01-16 07:02pm

neoolong wrote:Wasn't this posted before?

In ASVS

still always reminds me of....click!

Beaker · Post by **Beaker** » 2004-01-16 07:13pm

Woody Allen invented it years ago...

The Orgasmatron in his film 'Sleeper'

EmperorMing · Post by **EmperorMing** » 2004-01-17 10:06am

So now women want to compete with the 'one minute man'?

Slartibartfast · Post by **Slartibartfast** » 2004-01-17 11:12pm

Durandal wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:I'll care when they make something to improve male orgasms.
It's called "Not Getting Circumcised."

On other news, Durandal has found the cure for blindness. It's called "shouldn't have let that guy poke that pencil into your eyes."

darthdavid · Post by **darthdavid** » 2004-01-18 12:28am

Slartibartfast wrote:
Durandal wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:I'll care when they make something to improve male orgasms.
It's called "Not Getting Circumcised."
On other news, Durandal has found the cure for blindness. It's called "shouldn't have let that guy poke that pencil into your eyes."

Reminds me of a joke:
A helicopter piolet is flying over redmond washington when a dense fog rolls in. He flys towards the first building he sees and has his passengers make a sign saying "Where are we?" and then has his co-piolet hold it up to the window where the building's occupants can see it. The occupants of the building hold up a sign saying "You're in a helicopter flying over redmond washington. It's foggy out." The piolet then looks at a map and flys to the airport. Upon landing one of the passengers asks how he knew where he was and how to get to the airport. The piolet responds "It's quite simple really, I knew we were at the microsoft building because they gave a factually correct but completely usless answer."

Jeremy · Post by **Jeremy** » 2004-01-18 01:36am

huh well will one of you non circumcised members please get circumcised and tell me if there is a difference in pleasure