X-wing torpedo yield
Moderator: Vympel
X-wing torpedo yield
Cross posted from SW.com
Ok, since I already knew most of this from my work in the Navy, this only took me and google ~ 5 minutes.
I eyeball the proton torpedo at 50 cms tall and 50 cms wide at the base. Volume of a Cone is 1/3 height * area of base IIRC.
Now taking some assumptions from modern missiles: Fuel is 25% - 75% of the thing. Lets go with 75% to get a low end warhead yield. Now according to Star by Star, the things have ion engines on them. That means its going to use some kind of noble gas for fuel. Lets go with liquid argon: its inert, easy to store, etc. It has a density of 1.5x that of water. Lets assume the rest of the warhead has a density of water (~ what real missles have) That gives it a fuel mass of 36.8 kg and a total mass of ~45 kg.
Now according to I, Jedi proton torps have a flight time of 30 seconds, so it will eject ~1.2 kg per second.
According to here : http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tec ... pedo2.html they have an acceleration of 72,000 Gs. Since everyone knows Momentum = mass * velocity, and everyone knows the laws of motion, from that we can figure the exit velocit of the exhaust and its specific impulse (not relevent to the yield, but at 2,640,000 thats very impressive).
Now if we say that the sensors, power cell, casing, detonator, etc make up 20% of the remaining volume (not out of line, with the required microcircuirty and solid state electronics we see and the high energy density of power packs it is very reasonable) that gives us 5% for the fuel for the warhead itself. If we assume it it is thermonuclear in nature as indicated by the ROTJ novel, and assume only 50% efficiency (though modern warheads are more efficient, but we want low end), we can estimate its yeild.
Hydrogen fusion is typically what is meant, assuem the density of water, 5% of the total volume, and you get a mass of ~1.64 kg. Fusion releases 6.2*10^14 joules per kg. so multiply .5 * 6.2*10^14*1.6 = 5*10^14
or
120 kilotons
That is ~7.7 times greater then Hiroshima. And note that this si a focused explosion (so all the energy goes into the target) and the near miss barely scortched the paint on the Death Star. That is very tough armor. Now like I stressed, that is both low end and approximate and hinges on a number of assumptions. I'd feel better if I knew the volume:yield ratio for modern nukes and coud extrapolate from there, but what the hey.
Ok, since I already knew most of this from my work in the Navy, this only took me and google ~ 5 minutes.
I eyeball the proton torpedo at 50 cms tall and 50 cms wide at the base. Volume of a Cone is 1/3 height * area of base IIRC.
Now taking some assumptions from modern missiles: Fuel is 25% - 75% of the thing. Lets go with 75% to get a low end warhead yield. Now according to Star by Star, the things have ion engines on them. That means its going to use some kind of noble gas for fuel. Lets go with liquid argon: its inert, easy to store, etc. It has a density of 1.5x that of water. Lets assume the rest of the warhead has a density of water (~ what real missles have) That gives it a fuel mass of 36.8 kg and a total mass of ~45 kg.
Now according to I, Jedi proton torps have a flight time of 30 seconds, so it will eject ~1.2 kg per second.
According to here : http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tec ... pedo2.html they have an acceleration of 72,000 Gs. Since everyone knows Momentum = mass * velocity, and everyone knows the laws of motion, from that we can figure the exit velocit of the exhaust and its specific impulse (not relevent to the yield, but at 2,640,000 thats very impressive).
Now if we say that the sensors, power cell, casing, detonator, etc make up 20% of the remaining volume (not out of line, with the required microcircuirty and solid state electronics we see and the high energy density of power packs it is very reasonable) that gives us 5% for the fuel for the warhead itself. If we assume it it is thermonuclear in nature as indicated by the ROTJ novel, and assume only 50% efficiency (though modern warheads are more efficient, but we want low end), we can estimate its yeild.
Hydrogen fusion is typically what is meant, assuem the density of water, 5% of the total volume, and you get a mass of ~1.64 kg. Fusion releases 6.2*10^14 joules per kg. so multiply .5 * 6.2*10^14*1.6 = 5*10^14
or
120 kilotons
That is ~7.7 times greater then Hiroshima. And note that this si a focused explosion (so all the energy goes into the target) and the near miss barely scortched the paint on the Death Star. That is very tough armor. Now like I stressed, that is both low end and approximate and hinges on a number of assumptions. I'd feel better if I knew the volume:yield ratio for modern nukes and coud extrapolate from there, but what the hey.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
I don't see why the 2 kiloton yield from the SWTC is wrong--these were whatever torpedoes were laying around in Rebel HQ, and for a very specific target, which wasn't designed to take any fire. Keep in mind missile weaponry much larger in AOTC not appearing to have kiloton-range damage, and likewise with TPM protons.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Where was this indicated?Kamakazie Sith wrote:Yet, the proton torpedo blast caused internal explosions inside (unknown depth) the Death Star. Also, the X-Wings laser cannon seemed to penetrate the armor as well........
Let him land on any Lyran world to taste firsthand the wrath of peace loving people thwarted by the myopic greed of a few miserly old farts- Katrina Steiner
- Isolder74
- Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
- Location: Weber State of Construction University
- Contact:
Whenever a X-Wing hit the Death Star they would show explosion and people being thrown around inside it. Whwn Red Leader's Torpedoes missed the Port they showed a much more violent version of this.PainRack wrote:Where was this indicated?Kamakazie Sith wrote:Yet, the proton torpedo blast caused internal explosions inside (unknown depth) the Death Star. Also, the X-Wings laser cannon seemed to penetrate the armor as well........
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
Not all proton torpedoes. Given abysmal yields from the X-Wing series against ground targets, such micro-yield torps are necessary.evilcat4000 wrote:Since proton torpedoes were designed to hit heavily shielded capships their yield should be higher than the missiles seen in AOTC.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Aside from the ROTJ novel stating that missiles are thermonuclear and thus can't be less then 100 kt?Illuminatus Primus wrote:I don't see why the 2 kiloton yield from the SWTC is wrong
The hailfire missiles? Most of that was the shaft holding the fins on. I'd put my money on those being fission and only beign a couple of tons.--these were whatever torpedoes were laying around in Rebel HQ, and for a very specific target, which wasn't designed to take any fire. Keep in mind missile weaponry much larger in AOTC not appearing to have kiloton-range damage,
The Slave 1 missile? I used basically the same method Saxton did, it shouldn't be any different, but scale it and tell me.
The LAAT missiles? We see them go off inside a target which is constructed of materials designed to disperse energy adn with a very high specific heat. Its no wonder.
One we see hit a shield, no gageing from there, the other was not likely armed.and likewise with TPM protons.
Show the error in my math if you disagree IP.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
The problem with it is not your math, but the baseline assumption here. The explosions around the Rebels were thermonuclear, so now, all missiles must be thermonuclear?Ender wrote:Aside from the ROTJ novel stating that missiles are thermonuclear and thus can't be less then 100 kt?Illuminatus Primus wrote:I don't see why the 2 kiloton yield from the SWTC is wrong
What about the Rogue Squadron novels' protons used on ground targets and some aircraft? Those cannot be in the hundreds of kilotons, or we'd see nuclear-style fireballs from excess heat bleed-off.
EDIT:
Did you scale for the two or three proton grenades by your formula for the explosion at Endor?
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
- Mad
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
- Location: North Carolina, USA
- Contact:
As I recall, RotJ stated that there was a "thermonuclear explosion," but never identified the source. It's pretty safe to assume that it was from an enemy weapon, but that weapon is unidentified. (We don't know if it was a proton torpedo, concussion missile, space bomb, or what.) To assume it applies to all missile weapons used in SW is a hasty generalization fallacy.Ender wrote:Aside from the ROTJ novel stating that missiles are thermonuclear and thus can't be less then 100 kt?
Later...
- Darth Garden Gnome
- Official SD.Net Lawn Ornament
- Posts: 6029
- Joined: 2002-07-08 02:35am
- Location: Some where near a mailbox