Stewie commentary

YT300000 · Post by **YT300000** » 2004-02-18 11:21pm

I love how in his last post, Wong repeatedly says "Are you saying this asteroid isn't glowing?" and then shows the pic of it glowing. Pure hilarity.

Sarevok · Post by **Sarevok** » 2004-02-19 12:01am

Stewarts outrageous claims about himself clearly indicates he is a liar.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2004-02-19 12:08am

Thank you, Captain Obvious.

Post by **Gandalf** » 2004-02-19 12:10am

I've now read the debates and commentary.

I have this to say:

Oh the humanity!

How long before this one runs with his tail between his legs?

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2004-02-19 12:40am

YT300000 wrote:I love how in his last post, Wong repeatedly says "Are you saying this asteroid isn't glowing?" and then shows the pic of it glowing. Pure hilarity.

Comedy gold, but he only did it twice.

Rightous Fist Of Heaven · Post by **Rightous Fist Of Heaven** » 2004-02-19 01:20am

That air photo is priceless indeed. I figure Stewart just pulled some address quickly out of his ass and assumed that no-one would bother to check his bullshit. Unfortunately for him, his bullshit screen was seen thru from.

I wonder what kind of garbage he will be babbling next.

Patrick Degan · Post by **Patrick Degan** » 2004-02-19 03:18am

And once again, there are times when the comedy just writes itself.

Darth PhysBod · Post by **Darth PhysBod** » 2004-02-19 06:36am

BWAAAHAHAHAHAHHA

Strategic Defence Institute indeed

Ted C · Post by **Ted C** » 2004-02-19 10:48am

Has anyone tried calling his mom, yet?

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2004-02-19 11:49am

aerius wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote:I seriously doubt it, since that's a Maryland ID card and he lives in Illinois.
Claims to, I don't know if anyone's IP checked the bastard yet. Thing is I find his claims on shooting, fighting, and general "badass" stuff are remarkably similar to the ones made by Dennis on several message boards I'm on. Probably co-incidence but I wouldn't be surprised if it's him.

I'm praying its not because as a Marylander it would just hurt me to have to own up to my state producing a human being of that little intelligence.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2004-02-19 11:59am

Ted C wrote:Has anyone tried calling his mom, yet?

We should wait until the afternoon, I think.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2004-02-19 01:16pm

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:
Ted C wrote:Has anyone tried calling his mom, yet?
We should wait until the afternoon, I think.

You're really gonna do it? Man, sucks to be him.

Solauren · Post by **Solauren** » 2004-02-19 01:37pm

Whoever phone's her, remember to include is inviting people out to play with guns

In a way, it's too bad he hasn't posted anything that would be considered a come on to our female members...

muse · Post by **muse** » 2004-02-19 02:13pm

Solauren wrote:In a way, it's too bad he hasn't posted anything that would be considered a come on to our female members...

I doubt he's ever seen a female outside of internet porn sites. He wouldn't recognize a female here even if one of us smacked him in the face.

consequences · Post by **consequences** » 2004-02-19 03:03pm

CmdrWilkens wrote:
aerius wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote:I seriously doubt it, since that's a Maryland ID card and he lives in Illinois.
Claims to, I don't know if anyone's IP checked the bastard yet. Thing is I find his claims on shooting, fighting, and general "badass" stuff are remarkably similar to the ones made by Dennis on several message boards I'm on. Probably co-incidence but I wouldn't be surprised if it's him.
I'm praying its not because as a Marylander it would just hurt me to have to own up to my state producing a human being of that little intelligence.

Unfortunately, experience has proved that any number of morons can be produced by Maryland. Entirely too many in fact.

Iceberg · Post by **Iceberg** » 2004-02-19 03:17pm

Darth PhysBod wrote:BWAAAHAHAHAHAHHA

Strategic Defence Institute indeed

Kinda funny, since Google doesn't list a "Strategic Defense Institute."

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2004-02-19 04:15pm

Iceberg wrote:
Darth PhysBod wrote:BWAAAHAHAHAHAHHA

Strategic Defence Institute indeed
Kinda funny, since Google doesn't list a "Strategic Defense Institute."

I got a few hits after looking around, but they all seemed to be nothing, and totally unrelated to his fantasie.

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2004-02-19 04:46pm

This thread seems to be heading for the spam bin.

Straha · Post by **Straha** » 2004-02-19 05:48pm

Connor MacLeod wrote:This thread seems to be heading for the spam bin.

It'll probably survive untill Stewie has officially flown the coop, or comes back and starts making posts. Untill then just enjoy the atmosphere.

YT300000 · Post by **YT300000** » 2004-02-19 07:34pm

Rogue 9 wrote:
YT300000 wrote:I love how in his last post, Wong repeatedly says "Are you saying this asteroid isn't glowing?" and then shows the pic of it glowing. Pure hilarity.
Comedy gold, but he only did it twice.

Which is a sufficient number of times to be referred to as being done repeatedly.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2004-02-19 08:09pm

Connor MacLeod wrote:This thread seems to be heading for the spam bin.

True...but given the idiot involved persay against Mike...most appropriate.

I'll give the dork about another 1-2 weeks to give something anything before I lock down.

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2004-02-19 08:49pm

Straha wrote:
Connor MacLeod wrote:This thread seems to be heading for the spam bin.
It'll probably survive untill Stewie has officially flown the coop, or comes back and starts making posts. Untill then just enjoy the atmosphere.

The annoying thing is how everyone keeps chiming in with new thoughts on disproving his claim. I mean we've already got an aerial photograph, I don't think we need anyone else saying "I can't find any links to a SDI."

Stewart at SDI · Post by **Stewart at SDI** » 2004-02-19 09:16pm

Considering that i wont win squat with even that amount of money when all expenses are covered in just getting there, it still isnt worth my time. Truly Stewart, im confident in my research when i know that information is coming from legitimate sources, and from own experience. So far, you have NOT shown to have information from legitimate and reliable sources nor own experience on ANYTHING.

This is damn hilarious. Get this to your head moron, the maximum effective range of a weapon/round is not selective on who is using the weapon/round. Its a statistical fact. And i wouldnt be talking about this subject if i didnt have my own experience at that area. I've been shooting with .45 weapons all the way from the DE .45 to Glock .45 guns at targets in ranges from 15 to 50 meters, and i can be pretty sure about the validity of those specificational facts.

I have done all the research i need, and every single piece of information i have found ANYWHERE about this matter points out that you are flat out spatting bullshit. Since essentially, you are overcoming the maximum effective range of the rounds.

Stewart boy, what you can do in your dreams and what you can do in reality are two different things. And you have shown your "knowledge" or more accurately your lack of it, quite clearly.

You have, have you? Well the .45 round has a maximum range depending on the type and load of 1,200 to 2,100m. The .22 is in the same bracket. In WW-II the Thompson SMG, M-1928 had a range compensating rear sight regraduated to 600 yards. I know, I've used it. Kind of blows your range of the round argument out of the water now doesn't it? I know that you will raise the different MV argument, but does <200F/S really make that much difference that one could shoot 600, and the other only 50 yards? Get real.

Do some real research. Put up the "C" note, and I will blow your oppinions right out of the water.

I also note that the other "expert" has weaseled out of my offer to meet his $3,000 bet, because there is no profit in it. I can fly anywere in the world for under $1,000 each way, that leaves a grand for his profit. So much for his credability.

There are many ways to verify this chalege, why are all of you afraid to risk a few bucks to proove your point? Money talks and BS walks. You're all walking!

Lord of the Farce · Post by **Lord of the Farce** » 2004-02-19 09:23pm

Stewart at SDI wrote:There are many ways to verify this chalege, why are all of you afraid to risk a few bucks to proove your point? Money talks and BS walks. You're all walking!

You must have completely skipped page 6, becausing the only thing we're doing is laughing our heads off.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2004-02-19 09:27pm

Stewart at SDI wrote:There are many ways to verify this chalege, why are all of you afraid to risk a few bucks to proove your point?

Easy: No one thinks you're worth the nickel it would take to confirm your phone number, let alone actual palpable amounts of money to see your deformed face.