The Stewie has already backed down thread

Howedar · Post by **Howedar** » 2004-02-24 12:17pm

"I will reply after consulting other experts in the field"

Haha!

*breath*

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

*breath*

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2004-02-24 12:51pm

why is institute misspelled in his sig?

General Zod · Post by **General Zod** » 2004-02-24 12:54pm

perhaps english isn't his native language. i seem to recall him mentioning something about Germany. . . .or maybe he's just a really shitty speller. he misspells quite alot.

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2004-02-24 01:02pm

Howedar wrote:"I will reply after consulting other experts in the field"

Haha!

*breath*

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

*breath*

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Perhaps he wasnts to consult his bus driver friend next door-er, I mean, the Tactical Offense Academy.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2004-02-24 01:30pm

Chardok wrote:why is institute misspelled in his sig?

NTM "Strategic." And the grammar makes no sense.

Stewart's Sig wrote:Stratigic Defense Instatute, We provide Elegant Solutions to your Insolvable Problems.

Tribun · Post by **Tribun** » 2004-02-24 01:45pm

Just a quick note to explain that I will reply to your post in a week or so, after I have contacted other experts in the fields being discussed.

Who does he want to consult? Darkstar?!
Hmm...seems to be not impossible.

Let's see if he will really reply next week....

Patrick Degan · Post by **Patrick Degan** » 2004-02-24 02:30pm

Stewie the Lying Imbecile wrote: Please send any address that I can use to mail photos and documents to you. If you do not wish to give out your home address, work or General Delivery in your or any ajasent town will do. I do not own a scanner and have no idea how to get this stuff to you otherwise. You also have my direct e-mail address to avoid letting everyone else know it.

Budget cuts can be so detrimental to the running of any consultancy think-tank —especially when Mommy docks the director's allowance for again flunking Remedial EngComp.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2004-02-24 02:31pm

Master of Ossus wrote:
Chardok wrote:why is institute misspelled in his sig?
NTM "Strategic." And the grammar makes no sense.

Stewart's Sig wrote:Stratigic Defense Instatute, We provide Elegant Solutions to your Insolvable Problems.

Well Mike's got "Rigid" misspelled in his sig, so I wouldn't hammet that particular point too hard...

Cromag · Post by **Cromag** » 2004-02-24 02:38pm

Rogue 9 wrote:Well Mike's got "Rigid" misspelled in his sig, so I wouldn't hammet that particular point too hard...

Actually, that's a reference to his college days. IIRC "Ridgid" is actually the name of a company which manufactures tools.

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2004-02-24 02:47pm

Rogue 9 wrote:
Master of Ossus wrote:
Chardok wrote:why is institute misspelled in his sig?
NTM "Strategic." And the grammar makes no sense.

Stewart's Sig wrote:Stratigic Defense Instatute, We provide Elegant Solutions to your Insolvable Problems.
Well Mike's got "Rigid" misspelled in his sig, so I wouldn't hammet that particular point too hard...

How does one Hammet a point?

Cromag · Post by **Cromag** » 2004-02-24 02:48pm

Damn, Mike, this guy is too good not to immortalize on your debates page! If for nothing else than the idiotic manner in which he's revealed his "Institute" for what it really is; him and a bunch of buddies jerking off over their ST stomping SW fantasies.

You should get Phil's permission to use his pic somewhere in the post-mortem.

Cromag · Post by **Cromag** » 2004-02-24 02:51pm

Chardok wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote:
Master of Ossus wrote: NTM "Strategic." And the grammar makes no sense.

Well Mike's got "Rigid" misspelled in his sig, so I wouldn't hammet that particular point too hard...
How does one Hammet a point?

Perhaps he meant "Hamlet" a point? Where you obsess over the misdeeds of another while overlooking your own and end up getting yourself killed and taking a bunch of loved ones with you.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2004-02-24 03:02pm

Hammer. I saw it as soon as I hit the Submit button and there's no editing in here.

SpyderGS · Post by **SpyderGS** » 2004-02-24 04:27pm

You know, after reading the debate a couple times, I am starting to wonder if Stewart isn't trying to include the asteroids in the Hoth belt in his atmospheric density argument.
Stewart wrote:

The interaction that I cite has nothing to do with the environment, just the asteroid it self is enough to cause the effecxts that are clearly missing from the event as depicted. As I cited before the asteroid debries would have to expand to many millions of kilometers to expand enough to reach the dencity of the upper atmospher little own the dencity of interplanetary space that you cite.

And:

The dencity of matter in that field is many orders of magnatude higher than the density of interplanetary space as evidenced by the many asteroids very close together as depicted in the film.

Now I am completely unscientific, I know fuck-all about science and am nowhere near qualified to even begin any of the computations I have read here...that said, I can STILL UNDERSTAND the what everyone, Darth Wong in particular, has said to Stewart. Not being scientifically oriented, my first read of the quoted passages led me to interpret them that way.

I am also trying to find out about some of his "awards" . He quotes the VNS, to which I cannot find a reference and am unsure of the actual award (my assumption is the Vietnam Service Medal...but I am not certain), though I would like to know what units he was allegedly in when he received these awards. If anyone can pin down the VNS I'd appreciate it. My interest is, as previously pointed out, that of a veteran. I was a 98C (SigInt Analyst) and earned 3 AAMs, 1 ArCom, 2 Good Conducts (whoopdee-doo!), 1 PUC (attached to a unit in Bosnia during the first year) and a NATO ribbon (not to mention National Service and Overseas ribbons). I would personally take offense at someone claiming these awards who never earned them. Anyone remember the Navy Admiral that commited suicide a few years ago over questions regarding the "V" (for Valor) on one of his service ribbons? That's how seriously military personnel take this.

Anyway, interested in any thoughts on this and information anyone can find.

buzz_knox · Post by **buzz_knox** » 2004-02-24 04:36pm

The Admiral was Boorda. The slime ball who raised the fuss and hounded the Admiral to death was David Hackworth, who later said it was no big deal that he himself had ribbons he wasn't entitled to.

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2004-02-24 04:45pm

Wonderful how this SDI doesn't have a website, cannot be found in any directory, doesn't even have a SCANNER, and is located in a normal residential house.

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2004-02-24 04:57pm

Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Wonderful how this SDI doesn't have a website, cannot be found in any directory, doesn't even have a SCANNER, and is located in a normal residential house.

*Ahem*

It's OBVIOUSLY a sprwling underground (Veritable) metropolis of technology and supercomputers. They employ super-secret black helicopter brigades, and having a website would defeat their SUPER SECRET purpose of solving the "Insolvable". It must remain a SUPER SECRET. Yellow pages? Bah! OBVIOUSLY they are in the BLACK pages. Don't be so naive, Grand Admiral!

Cromag · Post by **Cromag** » 2004-02-24 06:49pm

Not to mention, the Institute's requirement that every member have a photographic memory obviates the need for primitive scanners.

Rightous Fist Of Heaven · Post by **Rightous Fist Of Heaven** » 2004-02-24 07:12pm

This is allready going past pathetic to the area of sad. He claims to be a goddamn expert and now he claims he will talk with other "experts" before answering? Yeah, he will propably convene with Jack and Marty, his fellow SDI "analysts" while drinking some lemonade and discussing how hot Julia Roberts is

Yes Stewart ,by all means constult your other "experts" and then come back. Perhaps those other "experts" can tell you the difference between a nuclear detonation in an athmosphere and in space.

General Zod · Post by **General Zod** » 2004-02-24 07:19pm

he's stated that his so-called degree is just in general science, which is laughable at best, as that means he's not an expert in any field whatsoever, but rather a generalist. if he even has that much.

Straha · Post by **Straha** » 2004-02-24 07:22pm

Damn, I miss shep. He would of called the house.

Mlenk · Post by **Mlenk** » 2004-02-25 02:04pm

Wow, so this think tank that Stewie supposedly works for can't afford a simple scanner yet any ordinary simple average working Joe can easily afford one?

This supposed think tank must be soooooo super secret that they can't even risk getting proper funding for equipment.

Cornelius · Post by **Cornelius** » 2004-02-25 04:52pm

Stratigic Defense Instatute, We provide Elegant Solutions to your Insolvable Problems.

I never heard of SDI----hmmm i think he's ripping off the "strategic defense initiative." What about you?

I find it highly doubtful to believe someone who says he is a "Ninja master."

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-02-25 06:34pm

Well, of course he's trying to pretend it had something to do with Reagan's SDI. When he knew he couldn't pull that off, he decided to pretend it was a "think tank" which gets paid handsomely by a few "select clients", but which somehow can't afford an $80 scanner.

Stewart at SDI · Post by **Stewart at SDI** » 2004-02-25 06:35pm

He claims to be a goddamn expert and now he claims he will talk with other "experts" before answering? Yeah, he will propably convene with Jack and Marty, his fellow SDI "analysts" while drinking some lemonade and discussing how hot Julia Roberts is

Yes Stewart ,by all means constult your other "experts" and then come back. Perhaps those other "experts" can tell you the difference between a nuclear detonation in an athmosphere and in space.

I am an expert in many things, but I do not have a degree that anyone here takes seriously. Everyone here ignores my points as if they are some how less valid because of my lack of degrees related to Physics. Therefore I have contacted a couple of internationaly known Astro-Physisists for their oppinions. Their responces will be posted in full.

The detonation that I was refering to was possably the "Starfish" shot at an altitude of either 400 kilometers or 400 miles. IIRC the latter. In either case it was far beyond what is concidered to be the conventional atmosphere at a local dencity of 1^-11-12 kilograms/meter^3. Since this dencity is almost exactly centered within the normaly accepted range of interplanetary space values, from 1^-9 to -15 OoM, I think it is a valid comparison. However, Mikes failure to address this range of values and subsiquent dirersion have made outside consultation neccessary.

Other parts of this thred are responces to other posters attacks based on remarks that I have made. I am not a computer wiz nor am I familiar with the "on line" etiquette involved in debates like this. In my naivete, I origionaly thought that this was going to be a fair and ballenced debate. Shame on me for not checking with the Computer Nerds and learning all the rules first, before joining this debate. But thats OK as I am a big boy and have learned to take it. I wonder if the rest of you are too.

Again, I am prepaired to answer any reasonable question put to me, in order to gain some sembelance of pairity in this forum.

Sincerely, Stewart.