I didn't quote the article because you NEED to see the picture.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Moderator: Edi
It has six legs. The article says so, or did you just look at the picture?Elheru Aran wrote:i just looked again... is it just my eyes or is there a THIRD leg????
The article's title wrote:'Warning' over three-headed frog
Eh? What environmental problems? What warning? *rereads the article* What the fuck? Did the writer just throw that in there to sound cool? He didn't even quote anyone about it!The article wrote:The creature - which has six legs - has stunned BBC wildlife experts who warned it could be an early warning of environmental problems.
He probably didn't explain it cause the problem's an old one and everyone's known about it for years.Stofsk wrote:Eh? What environmental problems? What warning? *rereads the article* What the fuck? Did the writer just throw that in there to sound cool? He didn't even quote anyone about it!
Were it a siamese triplet frog, it would more likely have twelve legs.Elheru Aran wrote:Idea-- maybe this is some kind of Siamese twin? If it has six legs, that's two too many... i figure as an embryo, the three didn't quite separate right? they would've been genetically identical otherwise, basically just frog triplets... am i correct?