Well I read it in Time Magazine, theski's done better then that though. Extraction isn't too hard, though some of it is too deep to reach. Exxon (well IIRC it was Exxon) actual started to develop one deposit with government backing in the early 80's as a response to the 1973 Oil embargo. But the whole thing was abandon when the price of oil fell drastically. Basically you dig up the rock, smash it and then wash off the oil. Canada gets much of the oil it exports to the US via a similar method, only digging up oil-laden sand rather then rocks.SirNitram wrote:
Two questions:
Source?
How difficult is it to get it out of shale?
Chavez warns U.S. about '100-year war
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Worlds Spanner wrote:I thought that we get hardly any oil from the Middle East anyway?
It's about eleven or so percent of the nations total usage. However what those middle eastern nations charge for there oil and how much of it they produce has a very direct effect on what the US pays at its other sources, OPEC and non OPEC.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Very old CNN article, not magnificentSources?
There's also other stuff; he's trying to pack the Supreme Court, which he has showed quite a bit of disrespect for already.
Venezeula's elections are tightly controlled by the government and the petition process was overseen by international observers - something that Chavez had initially completely rejected, I wonder why - so it's not entirely clear how the opposition could pull off a fraud of this magnitude.Hold on a minute. he decision that the recall petition was invalid was not an "arbitrary" one: reasons were given. I do read the news, and you're simply adopting the position of his opposition on this one.
BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman
I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
Hang on- that constitution was brought in by popular vote. This is bastard politics, not the rule of a tyrant- yet.Joe wrote:
Very old CNN article, not magnificent
There's also other stuff; he's trying to pack the Supreme Court, which he has showed quite a bit of disrespect for already.
140,000 signatures were rejected outright, while another million or so are under review (I think they want the people who supposedly made them to do it again) it's hardly a massive fraud.Venezeula's elections are tightly controlled by the government and the petition process was overseen by international observers - something that Chavez had initially completely rejected, I wonder why - so it's not entirely clear how the opposition could pull off a fraud of this magnitude.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/