Is there a true 'centre of the universe' and am I it?
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- C.S.Strowbridge
- Sore Loser
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:32pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Is there a true 'centre of the universe' and am I it?
Is there a centre of the universe, or is the nature of the universe such that it can be considered infinite and therefore no centre exits? Or, being infinite, could every point be considered the centre?
What I'm trying to say is, could you describe some point as the centre of the universe in anything but metaphorical terms?
What I'm trying to say is, could you describe some point as the centre of the universe in anything but metaphorical terms?
- C.S.Strowbridge
- Sore Loser
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:32pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
- C.S.Strowbridge
- Sore Loser
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:32pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
So the universe couild be considered infinite even though it's expanding? Or would it be finite given the known rate of expansion and generally accepted age? Or, even given the last two, would space-time not exist outside the boundry of our universe and therefore the universe could still be considered infinite.Mr Bean wrote:Center is always relative, in an infinte plane any point can be considered *Centeral
- C.S.Strowbridge
- Sore Loser
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:32pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Ok, so my next thought is this. If you were the captain of a starship and your only mission was to find the centre of universe, where it all began, could you do it? I was thinking maybe you could do it based on the relative age of certain areas.Durandal wrote:http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... &start=180
Think of it this way, as the universe expands the newer areas won't have time for stars to form. Older areas will have stars, older still would have dead stars. You start out in any point and move where the older space is. Once you get to a point where space is younger in all directions you should be at the centre. Sort of like using a compass to find the exact north pole. Once you get to a place where all directions are south you've found it.
Make sense? Or am I completely off base here.
- C.S.Strowbridge
- Sore Loser
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:32pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
- Durandal
- Bile-Driven Hate Machine
- Posts: 17927
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
No. The original singularity had no spatial coordinates, as it took up all space.Ok, so my next thought is this. If you were the captain of a starship and your only mission was to find the centre of universe, where it all began, could you do it? I was thinking maybe you could do it based on the relative age of certain areas.
The problem is that time is completely relative. How do you measure how old space is? It's not like new space is being created; space can expand faster than c, and that's all it's doing: expanding. It's like trying to measure individual sections of rubber. They're all the same. Also, when you zoom out and look at the universe on large enough scales, it looks exactly the same everywhere you look. There are no "edges." Special relativity disallows the existence of a preferred frame of reference, which is what a universal center would be.Think of it this way, as the universe expands the newer areas won't have time for stars to form. Older areas will have stars, older still would have dead stars. You start out in any point and move where the older space is. Once you get to a point where space is younger in all directions you should be at the centre. Sort of like using a compass to find the exact north pole. Once you get to a place where all directions are south you've found it.
Damien Sorresso
"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
- NecronLord
- Harbinger of Doom
- Posts: 27384
- Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
- Location: The Lost City
Of course there is, have you not seen my immense intellect, how can doubt that i am the creator center and supreme being of the universe?
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Well if Strowbridge was the center it would greatly ease the task of emplacing my universal implosion device. However that is not the case.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- C.S.Strowbridge
- Sore Loser
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:32pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
The problem is that time is completely relative. How do you measure how old space is?[/quote]Think of it this way, as the universe expands the newer areas won't have time for stars to form. Older areas will have stars, older still would have dead stars. You start out in any point and move where the older space is. Once you get to a point where space is younger in all directions you should be at the centre. Sort of like using a compass to find the exact north pole. Once you get to a place where all directions are south you've found it.
By looking at the objects within that space. It takes a certain amount of time for a black hole to form, so if there's a black hole there that space had to exist for at least that long.
Hmmm. Interesting. If there's no preferred frame of reference there can always be non-fundemental reference points. I'm trying to find a way my cult is supposed to find the Court of Azathoth, which is at the centre of the Universe. And your not helping. Oh well.It's not like new space is being created; space can expand faster than c, and that's all it's doing: expanding. It's like trying to measure individual sections of rubber. They're all the same. Also, when you zoom out and look at the universe on large enough scales, it looks exactly the same everywhere you look. There are no "edges." Special relativity disallows the existence of a preferred frame of reference, which is what a universal center would be.
- C.S.Strowbridge
- Sore Loser
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:32pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
- Pablo Sanchez
- Commissar
- Posts: 6998
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:41pm
- Location: The Wasteland
- C.S.Strowbridge
- Sore Loser
- Posts: 905
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:32pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact: