A disturbing thought

kojikun · Post by **kojikun** » 2004-03-23 01:32am

Being a furry does not require principle attraction to anthros. It does not require any at all. Get your definitions straight before you say stupid shit.

Ein: The fuck are you talking about?

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2004-03-23 01:33am

Darth Yoshi wrote:
Montcalm wrote:Here`s something quite fitting for a Star Wars board.
http://www.geocities.com/moncan1966/BF.txt
Hello!

I find it somewhat ugly for some reason...

Post by **Kuja** » 2004-03-23 01:49am

fgalkin wrote:Bah, all your pics fail before the power of

GADGET

NYANG!

Post by **Gandalf** » 2004-03-23 02:19am

fgalkin wrote:Bah, all your pics fail before the power of

GADGET

BOING!

Vertigo1 · Post by **Vertigo1** » 2004-03-23 03:05am

Sorry, but Angela from Gargoyles > Gadget anyday.

Tsyroc · Post by **Tsyroc** » 2004-03-23 03:10am

Zaia wrote:Well, who's surprised? I mean, after all, you are dating a cat...

Mabye he's one of those "hairless" cats.

The first question should be whether InnerBrat has had a tendancy to be attracted to guys with lots of chest and back hair?

Ravenwing · Post by **Ravenwing** » 2004-03-23 10:32am

fgalkin wrote:Bah, all your pics fail before the power of

GADGET

say what?

i can honestly say i never lusted after a cartoon rodent........

SyntaxVorlon · Post by **SyntaxVorlon** » 2004-03-23 10:49am

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:
Darth Yoshi wrote:
Montcalm wrote:Here`s something quite fitting for a Star Wars board.
http://www.geocities.com/moncan1966/BF.txt
Hello!
I find it somewhat ugly for some reason...

You're being sucked in by the yiffy, run spanky run!

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2004-03-23 11:01am

No, it's just that I find those kind of modified images to be pretty pointless and stupid, that's all.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-03-23 11:08am

Ravenwing wrote:
fgalkin wrote:Bah, all your pics fail before the power of

GADGET
say what? i can honestly say i never lusted after a cartoon rodent........

It's NOTHING compared to those people who lust after Greys. (y'know, actual Greys, not certain Earthling women with an uncanny resemblance to Greys)

BTW, Fgalkin... did you do that yourself?

Post by **fgalkin** » 2004-03-23 11:14am

According to my art teacher, I have the artistic ability of a three year old. Does that answer your question?

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Col. Crackpot · Post by **Col. Crackpot** » 2004-03-23 11:15am

the question you need to ask yourselves is a simple one. Would you tap that ass? I'd imagine it gives the phrase 'a piece of tail' a whole new meaning.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-03-23 11:18am

Col. Crackpot wrote:the question you need to ask yourselves is a simple one. Would you tap that ass? I'd imagine it gives the phrase 'a piece of tail' a whole new meaning.

That joke is so old.

Col. Crackpot · Post by **Col. Crackpot** » 2004-03-23 11:22am

Peregrin Toker wrote:
Col. Crackpot wrote:the question you need to ask yourselves is a simple one. Would you tap that ass? I'd imagine it gives the phrase 'a piece of tail' a whole new meaning.
That joke is so old.

so that is a yes?

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2004-03-23 11:23am

It may be old, but it's still a pretty funny pun.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-03-23 11:50am

Col. Crackpot wrote:
Peregrin Toker wrote:
Col. Crackpot wrote:the question you need to ask yourselves is a simple one. Would you tap that ass? I'd imagine it gives the phrase 'a piece of tail' a whole new meaning.
That joke is so old.
so that is a yes?

No, to the contrary! I find the idea of being sexually attracted to Gadget incredibly repulsive, but at least it's not necrophilia or one of its many offshoots.

General Zod · Post by **General Zod** » 2004-03-23 12:07pm

well, ya know what they say about necrophilia: "The girls just can't resist you! So go on today and crack open a cold one!"

Ace Pace · Post by **Ace Pace** » 2004-03-23 01:33pm

So I wasn't the only one!

Post by **fgalkin** » 2004-03-23 02:27pm

I hereby start the Cult of Gadget.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2004-03-23 03:12pm

Zaia wrote:Well, who's surprised? I mean, after all, you are dating a cat...

Aramis was a dog, though.

See?
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I have no idea what this 'gadget' thing was. It wasn't a patch on the Muskehounds, that's for damn sure.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-03-23 03:14pm

Ace Pace wrote:So I wasn't the only one!

You're a necrophile?

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2004-03-23 03:18pm

InnerBrat wrote:Aramis was a dog, though.
*snip picture*

Heh, that's kind of wierd.

I have no idea what this 'gadget' thing was. It wasn't a patch on the Muskehounds, that's for damn sure.

Gadget was a female mouse, and one of the main characters from Disney's syndicated cartoon series Chip 'n Dale's Rescue Rangers that first aired in the early to mid 90s.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2004-03-23 03:24pm

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:
InnerBrat wrote:Aramis was a dog, though.
*snip picture*
Heh, that's kind of wierd.

Not a good pic. I think it's mainly because he was sweet, romantic, and was kickass with a sword.
Although his poetry sucked.

Gadget was a female mouse, and one of the main characters from Disney's syndicated cartoon series Chip 'n Dale's Rescue Rangers that first aired in the early to mid 90s.

See? not a patch on the Muskehounds.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2004-03-23 03:25pm

Well, if it helps any, I've never heard of your cartoon before, either.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2004-03-23 03:28pm

*gasps*
You've never heard of Dogtanian and the Three Muskehounds?

Best cartoon since Dungeons and Dragons.