Moderator: Vympel
Same age as my father and english isn't even his first language and shows more grammar and knowledge than Stewie. 
Oh man, that is just classic.Darth Wong wrote:Nope, I used http://www.copyright.gov/records/cohm.html and you have to explicitly tell it to search on the registration number. The most hilarious thing is that he actually registered it as "Aerospace command from Strategic Defense Institute", thus he has inadvertently revealed that his "Strategic Defense Institute" is just the cutesy name he uses for his software developmentThe Kernel wrote:Is this the site you used? It doesn't show anything when for me.
It's not inconceivable. Cher is old too, but that doesn't make her smart or wise. I'm still chuckling over the fact that he accidentally revealed that his "Strategic Defense Institute" was just a cute name for his independent one-man game developer (note that the copyright claimant is an individual, not a corporation as usual). In short, he inadvertently proved that his "Strategic Defense Institute" exists only as a name.Meest wrote:What's more hilarious is that he might actually be 55, that makes his case much worse
Did he spell it right on the copyright?Darth Wong wrote:Nope, I used http://www.copyright.gov/records/cohm.html and you have to explicitly tell it to search on the registration number. The most hilarious thing is that he actually registered it as "Aerospace command from Strategic Defense Institute", thus he has inadvertently revealed that his "Strategic Defense Institute" is just the cutesy name he uses for his software development
*sigh*Tribun wrote:Sice it was burried by the flood of posts, I repeat it here:
Mike, that guy had gone though your Imperial Smackdown, AND a 5-rounds debate. Normal procedure won't help against such stupidy. What is impressive is, that after the debate, he really started to sprout even more bullshit, as if he felt only more right.
That is a Acolyte of Darkstar!
I think it is good that you started more serious measures. Banning him seems to be the only way to send him to hell.
By the way, is there any chance that you can tall us when you expect the debate too appear on the site?
I'm sorry that this is being posted so far afte the fact, but that one's priceless. He actually claimed that nuclear fusion of iron takes place in the Earth's core and releases energy.Stewart at SDI wrote:If the pressure is high enough, Iron will undergo "FUSION" and add to the energy liberated by the fission in the "DEPLEETED MATIERIAL CORE". AFTER ALL, IT IS HOW ALL THE HEAVIER ELEMENTS WERE MADE.
Aerius is just being generous, but I've reminded Shithead at SDI of that fact many times. To date, he has never even vaguely acknowledged that criticism, which is another clear sign that he's either an idiot or a troll (or both).The Dude wrote:I'm not sure why you would even yield the 80-km ball to him; it's orders of magnitude more massive than any even theorized to exist at Earth's core.
given his supposed age of 50+, and the fact that at least some of his BS is true (his registered copyright for some game by his imaginary SDI), i'm quite inclined to imagine he's both. Easily the saddest example of a troll i've ever seen if even a third of his story is true.Darth Wong wrote:Aerius is just being generous, but I've reminded Shithead at SDI of that fact many times. To date, he has never even vaguely acknowledged that criticism, which is another clear sign that he's either an idiot or a troll (or both).The Dude wrote:I'm not sure why you would even yield the 80-km ball to him; it's orders of magnitude more massive than any even theorized to exist at Earth's core.
Actually, in this case he's actually right. Fast fission of the tamper (usually U238) can often dramatically boost the yield of a weapon. In the Castle Bravo test, 10MT of the 15MT detonation was in fact generated by fast fission of the tamper (link). However, to do so requires somewhat exotic conditions, such as neutrons above 1.5 MeV. By itself, U-238 can't form into a critical (much less supercritical) mass.consequences wrote:If a fucking sleeve can provide 'more than half' the energy in a fusion bomb, why the fuck would anyone bother with the fusion bomb in the first place asshat?! Does the sleeve of plastic explosive around the Uranium in a fission bomb provide 50%+ of the energy release from the bomb? The entire point about using a fission detonation to kickstart a fusion reaction is that a far higher energy yield can be gained from a fusion reaction, and the only efficient means we have of creating one is by using an atomic explosion as the fucking pilot light.
It's not just the neutron energy; it's the density. The funniest part is Stewart's belief that you can somehow shove such an incredibly dense beam of neutrons through more than 6000 km of crust, mantle, and outer core to completely saturate an 80km wide sphere of uranium so that you get neutron capture in every single uranium atom throughout that sphere, before the sheer superheating effect of this neutron beam blows apart the planet and/or the target spherephongn wrote:Actually, in this case he's actually right. Fast fission of the tamper (usually U238) can often dramatically boost the yield of a weapon. In the Castle Bravo test, 10MT of the 15MT detonation was in fact generated by fast fission of the tamper (link). However, to do so requires somewhat exotic conditions, such as neutrons above 1.5 MeV. By itself, U-238 can't form into a critical (much less supercritical) mass.
Naturally he will tell me that I obviously don't understand nuclear fusion and that I should read some coffee table book to bring myself up to speed.Darth Wong wrote:I didn't even notice him saying that. That's hilarious; any child could do a simple Google search to see how that's totally wrong from any number of educational sources.
You claim it's copyrighted. Meaning, you have a copyright assigned to it. Now provide the number.Stewart at SDI wrote: Why should I do that? The PC marketing model shows that open source systems are self replicating and add to them selves as everyone putts in their two cents worth.
You have twelve hours. And make sure to tell me WHEN your copyright was filed. Just the year.I'll see if I can find it just for you.
DPDarkPrimus wrote:You claim it's copyrighted. Meaning, you have a copyright assigned to it. Now provide the number.Stewart at SDI wrote: Why should I do that? The PC marketing model shows that open source systems are self replicating and add to them selves as everyone putts in their two cents worth.
Okay, clearly I haven't been keeping up in my nuclear studies. Withdrawn.Darth Wong wrote:It's not just the neutron energy; it's the density. The funniest part is Stewart's belief that you can somehow shove such an incredibly dense beam of neutrons through more than 6000 km of crust, mantle, and outer core to completely saturate an 80km wide sphere of uranium so that you get neutron capture in every single uranium atom throughout that sphere, before the sheer superheating effect of this neutron beam blows apart the planet and/or the target spherephongn wrote:Actually, in this case he's actually right. Fast fission of the tamper (usually U238) can often dramatically boost the yield of a weapon. In the Castle Bravo test, 10MT of the 15MT detonation was in fact generated by fast fission of the tamper (link). However, to do so requires somewhat exotic conditions, such as neutrons above 1.5 MeV. By itself, U-238 can't form into a critical (much less supercritical) mass.
Exactly. If you have a neutron beam _THAT_ powerful, you most likely don't even need this mythical 80km uranium sphere (which btw would most likely be in the billions of critical masses, causing an explosion anyway! to destroy the planet you're trying to drill through with the neutron beam anyway...Darth Wong wrote:It's not just the neutron energy; it's the density. The funniest part is Stewart's belief that you can somehow shove such an incredibly dense beam of neutrons through more than 6000 km of crust, mantle, and outer core to completely saturate an 80km wide sphere of uranium so that you get neutron capture in every single uranium atom throughout that sphere, before the sheer superheating effect of this neutron beam blows apart the planet and/or the target spherephongn wrote:Actually, in this case he's actually right. Fast fission of the tamper (usually U238) can often dramatically boost the yield of a weapon. In the Castle Bravo test, 10MT of the 15MT detonation was in fact generated by fast fission of the tamper (link). However, to do so requires somewhat exotic conditions, such as neutrons above 1.5 MeV. By itself, U-238 can't form into a critical (much less supercritical) mass.
Wasn't he boasting that the real estate taxes he paid on his property were more than most people's houses were worth?DPDarkPrimus wrote:Apparently, he conducted the following real-estate deal on Juen 23, 2003:
201 S. Central Ave., Rockford; Stewart F. Davies to Assignment Properties Inc., $16,000
