Page 5 of 6

Posted: 2003-01-24 11:14pm
by ^^
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:That's egging, you idiot.

I did the same thing to Azeron...
whatever babe

just dont burn the popcorn

Posted: 2003-01-24 11:17pm
by Darth Wong
^^ wrote:I'M NOT THIS PAVEL OR RAY PERSON 43JHB4TK3B4%#@$^#
Then I suggest you stop acting like him. Leave Spanky alone; he's been around a lot longer than you have, and has more goodwill in the bank.

Posted: 2003-01-24 11:19pm
by ^^
Darth Wong wrote:
^^ wrote:I'M NOT THIS PAVEL OR RAY PERSON 43JHB4TK3B4%#@$^#
Then I suggest you stop acting like him. Leave Spanky alone; he's been around a lot longer than you have, and has more goodwill in the bank.
try (something) with someone who wants to cirumsize you and see how YOU feel

are you aware of the pain of snipped infants

Posted: 2003-01-24 11:24pm
by Darth Wong
^^ wrote:are you aware of the pain of snipped infants
Perhaps you don't know how to read. I already said earlier that I didn't let them circumcise either of my boys. What does that have to do with harassing Spanky over your insistence that he's a girl?

Posted: 2003-01-24 11:27pm
by ^^
Darth Wong wrote:
^^ wrote:are you aware of the pain of snipped infants
Perhaps you don't know how to read. I already said earlier that I didn't let them circumcise either of my boys. What does that have to do with harassing Spanky over your insistence that he's a girl?


spanky has something against me

i don't know what it could possibly be

Posted: 2003-01-24 11:29pm
by Montcalm
It must depend on wich hospital because i was`nt circumcise.

Posted: 2003-01-24 11:30pm
by aerius
^^ wrote:spanky has something against me

i don't what it could possibly be
Did it ever occur to you that you're a good for nothing dipshit and a moronic fucking asshole as well? Go stick your dick in a meat grinder so we don't have to read your shit on this board.

Posted: 2003-01-24 11:31pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
I told him to shut the fuck up last night, and then he immediately started doing this.

Posted: 2003-01-24 11:31pm
by ^^
aerius wrote:
^^ wrote:spanky has something against me

i don't what it could possibly be
Did it ever occur to you that you're a good for nothing dipshit and a moronic fucking asshole as well? Go stick your dick in a meat grinder so we don't have to read your shit on this board.
*sticks soap in your mouth*

Posted: 2003-01-25 12:55am
by Frank Hipper
Oh, you better not be using the evidence of botched operations to cover every procedier performed, or I'll have to kick you.

My grandfather died two years ago from a complication during a normally safe heart procedier (the one where they remove blockage with a tube, I think). Does that mean we should ban it?
No, I'm not. Please don't kick me. The gist of the site was "look what can happen, it's unnescesary." There were also several photos showing damage to guys in gay porn photos, apparently they weren't even aware it's not supposed to look like that.

And I'm extremely sorry to hear about your gandfather. My dad has an anuerism that is next to impossible to operate on. My blood runs cold when I think about it.

Posted: 2003-01-25 03:07am
by Einhander Sn0m4n
I'm cut (rather loosely) and considering it was barbaric, the surgeon did a good job on me. If I had the chance, I'd deck him and my parents for even thinking about it!

Posted: 2003-01-25 03:13am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Don't worry about me, Frank. I'm pretty much over it completely.

But I do have to comment that your link pretty much said "Look what happens when you fuck up: don't fuck up." and not "Look what happens when you fuck up: don't do it".

Everything has risks, but properly done circumcision (especially done while the patient is an infant) has very little risk.

Posted: 2003-01-25 03:18am
by Darth Wong
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Everything has risks, but properly done circumcision (especially done while the patient is an infant) has very little risk.
But great pain, permanent mutilation, reduced nerve sentivity around the head of the penis for life, and no rational justification. The reasons I've heard are ridiculous:
  1. In rare cases, it might grow funny and require subsequent surgery. Did you know that in rare cases, testicles grow funny and require painful surgery? Maybe we should cut off everyone's fucking ball-sack to avoid this :roll:
  2. Hygiene issues. Hygiene? Two words: soap and water.

Posted: 2003-01-25 03:23am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Meh, I really don't care that much. I was circumcised, and so were a lot of people I've known.

Well, doesn't really matter for me anyway, as I plan on having girls. :P

Posted: 2003-01-25 03:41am
by Frank Hipper
Darth Wong wrote:
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Everything has risks, but properly done circumcision (especially done while the patient is an infant) has very little risk.
But great pain, permanent mutilation, reduced nerve sentivity around the head of the penis for life, and no rational justification. The reasons I've heard are ridiculous:
  1. In rare cases, it might grow funny and require subsequent surgery. Did you know that in rare cases, testicles grow funny and require painful surgery? Maybe we should cut off everyone's fucking ball-sack to avoid this :roll:
  2. Hygiene issues. Hygiene? Two words: soap and water.
I have no doubt that the popularity of circumcision in the U.S. arose from some jerkwad 19th century puritanical quack who thought that de-sensitizing the penis is a really good and Godly thing. I know it's popularity is declining, but it still happens. I've instilled a few barbs of guilt into my mom for having it done, BTW. :D

Posted: 2003-01-25 03:43am
by Spanky The Dolphin
You know, I don't think I'd want my penis any more sensitive. I have enough problems with it as it is. :P

Posted: 2003-01-25 03:53am
by The Yosemite Bear
lol

gee, I think we can figure out this answer with a little knowledge of some of the things I said in some of the religious debates...

*Hint, my dad's Jewish, hint*

Posted: 2003-01-25 04:43am
by unigolyn
Uncut and very glad I am.

The hygiene argument IS a joke, I second Wong's soap and water comment. As harmless as circumcision is in the grand scheme of things, it's still unnecessary, and performing unnecessary cosmetic surgery on infants just doesn't seem a very sensible thing to do.

What if the technology to engineer beard growth out of your male baby? Sure it would promote hygiene and personally I wouldn't mind not having to shave, but what about people who WANT beards later in life?

And one other thing - although the vast majority of cut men don't have any problems with it, there are people who want theirs back. I don't know of any uncut men who wish they were cut, and if they do exist, they CAN get it cut, of their own free will.

Posted: 2003-01-25 11:39am
by Sektor31
I don't know of any uncut men who wish they were cut, and if they do exist, they CAN get it cut, of their own free will.
But it would be excruciatingly(sp?) painful after they wake up from the anaesthesia. They wouldn't walk upright for months. :D

Posted: 2003-01-25 11:45am
by Montcalm
Sektor31 wrote:
I don't know of any uncut men who wish they were cut, and if they do exist, they CAN get it cut, of their own free will.
But it would be excruciatingly(sp?) painful after they wake up from the anaesthesia. They wouldn't walk upright for months. :D
Who in is right mind would want it cut, not me.

Posted: 2003-01-25 12:07pm
by Alyeska
I was cut when I was a baby and I am fucking pissed off about it. The choice was taken away from me and now it will cost me my own money to reverse this. When I do have enough money, I intend on having it grown back and then I am going to bill my parents for the procedure. :evil:

Posted: 2003-01-25 12:34pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
No offence, Alyeska, but that sounds pretty funny. :mrgreen:

Posted: 2003-01-25 12:40pm
by ArmorPierce
^^ wrote:now, back to the topic~ removal of foreskin is known to reduce sexual pleasure

thats a crime in itself
No, it reduces sensitivity so that you last longer before you orgasm but the orgasm is just as strong.

http://www.circinfo.com/myths/myths_and_lies1.html here you go,

another link about myths like the foreskin plays a role during sex and for the other guy that quoted that from the site try quoting the whole thing, makes more sense that way.
Like the appendix, the foreskin is a remnant from our evolutionary past and now serves no essential purpose. Unlike the appendix, which is buried deep inside the abdomen, the foreskin is easily and safely removed as a preventative measure.

When man's ancestors swung through the trees and fought their way naked through dense undergrowth there was a possible value to a protective sheath over the creative organ to prevent it being ripped to pieces by the bushes. Now that we walk upright, live in towns and cities and normally wear clothing there is no longer the need for this appendage. Occasionally a hazard of having a redundant foreskin is the ease with which it can get caught in a zipper - this particularly occurs in the young, growing male.

Whilst one never encounters male animals without a penis sheath, nature often produces boys who have little or no foreskin (naturally circumcised). Furthermore, around 10% of men have foreskins which are so short that they retract fully behind the glans at or before puberty and play no further part in sexual activities. If man needed the foreskin for anything then these apparent anomalies wouldn't occur.

Posted: 2003-01-25 01:34pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Alyeska wrote:I was cut when I was a baby and I am fucking pissed off about it. The choice was taken away from me and now it will cost me my own money to reverse this. When I do have enough money, I intend on having it grown back and then I am going to bill my parents for the procedure. :evil:
GOOD IDEA!!!! Of course my dad can't pay his phone bill and my mom's dead (she was probly the one who told the doc to do it, what a crack head [literally]!!!)

Posted: 2003-01-25 07:02pm
by InnerBrat
OK girls and guys, what about PREFERENCES?

Me, i like something to play with :twisted: