Broomstick wrote:Er.... they're the same person. Of course, a Tragic Hero can descend into villainy, but that doesn't eliminate the Tragic Hero phase.
Sylvannas' Tragic Hero phase was gone since the end of LK. Since then she has descended into a pit of villainy the likes of which would make Vader jealous. And no, thematically Vader and Anakin are not the same person, but I'm not turning this into a SW thread: so cut the "even if Anakin was." My point was that people were drawn to Vader because he was evil AND a badass. You don't find anyone trying to justify his murderous deeds, at least no one sane.
And I could buy that, but I can't buy anyone on Azeroth putting her in charge of shit. It's lazy ass writing.
The primary responsibility of "video game writers" is to generate a game that keeps the money rolling in via keeping the players playing. WoW seems to have mastered that one. Granted they no longer have 12 millions subscribers or whatever the peak number was, but there are still sufficient to keep the lights on. "Video game writers" are NOT there to generate a novel, or even a coherent narrative over the long term. Continuity is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay down on the list, as are rational motivations or a lot of other things considered essential in other media.
That's a pretty weak argument for shit writing. One of the big selling points of WoW by Blizzard and the playerbase was the massive amounts of built-in and easy to understand lore. Further, people didn't buy into 2 Mass Effect sequels based off the combat: people playing RPGs like well-written stories.
One of the appeals of certain types of video game characters is playing an evil character - my Foresaken warlock in WoW is an evil bad-ass who, if given a moral choice, is going to pick the bad one/left hand path/EEEEEEEEEEEEEVUUUUL! one. Because after a hard day at work suppressing my urge to choke the living shit out of someone that richly deserves it - i.e. "taking the high road" - it feels good to fantasize about cutting loose and giving into those evil, violent impulses.
Which fits into what I thought the Forsaken would actually be at launch: a hard-mode "fuck it all" faction KOS for Horde and Alliance. Having them in the Horde made no sense outside a "meat shield" level. The opening narration supported this.
However, after LK: the Undead playerbase kicked up a fuss about how unapologetically evil the Forsaken could and have been. A big part of this was attempting to turn Sylvy around as a character. To humanize her and give her a change of heart.... while she gassed civilians.
At this point I don't give a fuck about 90% of the narrative. We've got broken continuity, a reboot, and arbitrary personality changes. Who the fuck cares? Give me baubles and pew-pew. It's a fucking game, not the Great American Fantasy Novel.
Shit writing is shit writing. Imagine Genn had killed Sylvy at Legion start and the Horde were like "whatever." That's what the lore has become: Blizzard glossing over/flat-out ignoring what should be huge cock-ups.
So yes, in fact, you have a sub-group who are HAPPY Sylvanas is evil. Also, there can never be peace on Azeroth because then there'd be no reason for a new expansion so there always has to be something fucking things up. It will be "Yay! We defeated the Legion!" then of course Sylvanas will backstab someone or something, because there always has to be conflict to keep the game going. That's why it's WARcraft and no Diplomacycraft or Capitalistcommercecraft or whatever.
Expansion end-bosses: Kil'Jaeden, Arthas, Deathwing, Garrosh (an Orc supremacist at the time), Gul'Dan(Archi), and now the Legion: there are plenty of non-Alliance and non-Horde to wage war against.
That the Horde continue to backstab the shit out of the Alliance and Azeroth as a whole means they should have been dismantled.
Broomstick wrote:But "oh, she murdered so-and-so's son in front of him" is not automatically disqualifying for leadership. Real history is replete with leaders who murdered and committed genocide and were hailed as heroes by their side (Vlad Tepes, for example). That's part of the point - the threat faced by Azeroth is so fucking terrible that people will unite behind an evil bitch if it gives them the chance to win. Rather like the Alliance Night Elves freed the Illidari to fight for Azeroth. War makes strange bedfellows (the alliance between Stalin and the UK/US during WWII). Have no fear, when the Legion is defeated whatever union was created to deal with them will immediately fracture and the various factions will go back to trying to exterminate each other.
The Nelves in the Alliance aren't continuing to try and fuck everyone. Sylvy can't even be counted on to not commit attrocities on her own allys: Blood Elves at SoO, Koltira which should have had the DK Horde faction at war, and now Warriors in general.
And her FIRST official act as warchief of the Horde was to cut a deal with cursed-Norse-Devil chick
to enslave an entire race of beings for her own benefit. Not the Alliance, not the Horde, not even the Forsaken: her own personal benefit. While a war is going on and like CWM mentioned: trying to steal good soldiers in the fight against the Legion.
Kerrigian 2.0 is pure fucking cancer to Azeroth. She shouldn't be in charge of a latrine, much less an entire faction.
We could have had a moment where GREYMANE was hurting Azeroth with his vendetta against Sylvy. But NOPE: he just happens to stumble upon a plan that, if the roles were switched (imagine Graymane making the same deal to cure the Worgen curse) not a single fucking person would be claiming Greymane wasn't an asshole. And he damn sure would be out on his ass in the Alliance.... if Blizzard even bothered to write a few lines of dialog.
But "something something voo-doo spirits say Kerrgia... I mean ur, The Banshee Queen of Blade.... ur, whatever: SHE'S SUPER-SPECIAL YO! Put her in charge." I wonder if any Sylvy fanatics realize Blizzard is completely recycling Starcraft 2 horseshit for Sylvannas.