
Or they'd just technobabble the SSD to death. I personally favor the Reverse Polarized Tachyonic Baryon Waveform Phasebeam of Doom

Moderator: Vympel
All inferior to the Giant Phase Cloaked Death Torpedo.I don't know if it's been stated before, but I'm all for the Phase Cloaked Oberth of Doom. That'll ruin the SSDs day
Or they'd just technobabble the SSD to death. I personally favor the Reverse Polarized Tachyonic Baryon Waveform Phasebeam of Doom
Who said i was a Trekkie? I just don't think a single SSD could take on the AQ.Jawawithagun wrote:Notice how the Trekkies need no industrial capacity to produce an unlimited amount of phase cloaks, nor do they have any shortage of trained personnel due to their transporter cloning devices![]()
Though, I won't try to get though the red tape to try to apply for retirement with eight other versions of me out there doing the same.
Two words: lost technology.Who said i was a Trekkie? I just don't think a single SSD could take on the AQ.
Who said they ahd unlimited Phase Cloaks? They only need one.
After all, they already have one Phase Cloak, unless they took it apart. Put the ONE Phase Cloak on ONE ship. Fill it with Antimatter. Wait for the SSD to lower it's shields for some reason, ANY reason, as I doubt it'll keep them up 24/7. Maybe when it's in orbit of a planet or something. Anyway, fly in the PCOoD(tm), Decloak, SSD go boom. You need, like, 2 people to fly the thing.
Suicide is no way to beat the Empire. But a single ship is NOT the Empire. They could do it.
Yes, which is why if all else fails, they can just ram the SSD until it gives upCpt_Frank wrote:Don't forget that with the SRTACD (short range transportation and cloning device) you can also re-juvenate old comrades again which will enable all comrade soldiers of starfleet to serve the united communist federation of socialist planets for eternity.
1. The ECS is gonna have to pull up in orbit in order to bombard a planet, likely. Or it'll HAVE to drop out of hyperspace to fight a fleet. Or just park the PCOoD at a major planet the ECS will definitley go to (Vulcan, Andor, Earth) and wait for it.Cpt_Frank wrote:And there come the problems of the plan:
1. The ECS will have something to do. It won't just sit there and do nothing, which makes it difficult for the phase-cloaked bomb to follow, for it is much slower.
2. Cloak detection: on a phase cloaked ship, artificial gravity is still active.
The ECS should be able to pick up the gravity, and target the ship.
3. Once the ship is spotted, the ECS can use nerve gas to kill the crew of the ship, or simply run away.
4. Will the Feds ever have this idea?
1. I know. Which is why it waits at one planet. This is also assuming the ECS has foreknowledge of Feddie space, planets, etc...Cpt_Frank wrote:1.You didn't uderstand that. I try to make that clearer: The ECS hypers from planet X at the one edge of Fed space to planet Y at the other end of Fed space in several hours. The fed phase cloak ship will need weeks to cover that distance.
2.Will make work on the ship difficult.
3.Chemical warfare is extremely common in the SW galaxy, so they'll probably have a huge collection of various agents aboard the ship. Also, the comprehensive databanks found aboard all the Fed vessels and starbases will make it very easy to collect information.
4.We've never seen anything like that from the Feds.
5.Wasn't the only existing phase cloak from pegasus to be destroyed because the romulans demanded it?
Actually, I was wrong.Master of Ossus wrote:First of all, the quote was that the fleet had CHECKED IN. That implies that all of its ships were involved in the engagement, and that it had only had about a hundred ships, initially during the engagement.
Second, are you seriously claiming that the Federation was strategically moronic for bringing along lots of worthless, cannon fodder ships when only the Defiant class ships were capable of fighting?
Third, we know that Centaurs are of comparable firepower to an Attack Ship, because one of those engaged Sisko's ship by itself. If it was significantly outgunned by the ship, the Centaur should have let Sisko and his crew go or called up reinforcements. It should not have engaged if it was deficient in firepower.
Fourth, the Klingons have 1,500 ships. The Federation has 10,000 ships. We'll be generous and say that the Romulans were only able to commit 250 ships to combat. This means that the Jem'Hadar outnumber the Federation and its allies by less than 50%, and their ships are clearly less powerful. Remember that the Klingon fleet, by itself, was able to hold off ALL THREE of the Dominion's major powers for a significant amount of time. This should have been impossible if, as you claim, the Jem'Hadar and their allies were about as powerful as the Klingons and Federation, ship for ship. Clearly something else is going on, here.
I'm going to bed. I'll check back and see if you've responded tomorrow.
Hardly. The Alliance had full expectations to win, and after the Cardassians changed sides they still expected 40% causalities of their remaining forces in the final push against Cardassia.Stormbringer wrote:A dues ex ending yanked out of the writer's ass?Alyeska wrote:
Please do tell me how the Federation won the war with 4-5K ships with the Klingons and Romulans supplying equal numbers.
1. Ummm yeah okaypecker wrote: 1. I know. Which is why it waits at one planet. This is also assuming the ECS has foreknowledge of Feddie space, planets, etc...
2. I'm sure they can install a seatbelt on the captain's chairOr jsut way magnetic boots and turn them off when the ECS jumps in.
3. I doubt every SF databank has info on a top secret, illegal project.
4. Again, they will when faced with immediate destruction (The onlt time before this was in FC, and the Treaty was still in effect at that time. Once the Rommies start losing like mofos, I'm sure they'll let the Feddies build a phase cloak.
5. Was it? I dont' pay much attention to Trek. But I'm sure they kept the plans for it somewhere, even if it's in someone's head. Maybe take the Pegasus' Captian out of prison? It's not a lost tech, just misplaced.
Darth Wong wrote:Hey Alyeska, could you do us a favour and print the actual onscreen quotes which you are using to generate all of these numbers? Because it sort of looks like you're just pulling numbers out of thin air (eg- "1500 ships and they were outnumbered 20 to 1").
Ah, so according to the Romulan (who we assume performed the correct mental math rather than exaggerating), the combined forces of the Breen, the Cardassians, and the Dominion add up to either 22,000 ships or 30,000 ships. This would imply roughly 7,000 to 10,000 ships per group, many of which are relatively small (ie- fighters, 100m long "attack ships", etc).Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Here we go
From DS9 "When it Rains..."
MARTOK: By tomorrow, we'll have eleven hundred Klingon vessels ready for deployment.
ROMULAN: (dismissive) With the Breen, the Cardassians and the Jem'Hadar you're still outnumbered twenty-to-one.
I do believe 1100 was changed to 1500, but I could be wrong.
Unlikely. What do you care that your enemy outnumbers you 20-1 when half of them are non-combat craft? All you care about being outnumbered is the 10-1 combat ships.Darth Wong wrote:Ah, so according to the Romulan (who we assume performed the correct mental math rather than exaggerating), the combined forces of the Breen, the Cardassians, and the Dominion add up to either 22,000 ships or 30,000 ships. This would imply roughly 7,000 to 10,000 ships per group, many of which are relatively small (ie- fighters, 100m long "attack ships", etc).Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Here we go
From DS9 "When it Rains..."
MARTOK: By tomorrow, we'll have eleven hundred Klingon vessels ready for deployment.
ROMULAN: (dismissive) With the Breen, the Cardassians and the Jem'Hadar you're still outnumbered twenty-to-one.
I do believe 1100 was changed to 1500, but I could be wrong.
BTW, he doesn't seem to state which class of vessels he's talking about. The word "vessels" is pretty vague; is he including non-combat support craft?
Circular logic. Who said that Martok meant "combat ships" when he referred to his own "vessels", and why should we use that assumption in order to conclude that they must have meant the same when referring to the enemy vessels? You are assuming that Martok meant "combat ships" when he said "vessels", in order to prove that Martok meant "combat ships" when he said "vessels."Alyeska wrote:Unlikely. What do you care that your enemy outnumbers you 20-1 when half of them are non-combat craft? All you care about being outnumbered is the 10-1 combat ships.BTW, he doesn't seem to state which class of vessels he's talking about. The word "vessels" is pretty vague; is he including non-combat support craft?
Actually Bashir made the statement that Starfleet couldn't keep taking losses like that. Out of 112 ships, 14 survived. That is a 87% casualty rate. Bashir wasn't referring to the 7th fleet itself as hugely significant loss to the fleet, but the loss of so many ships to few surviving.Darth Wong wrote:Circular logic. Who said that Martok meant "combat ships" when he referred to his own "vessels", and why should we use that assumption in order to conclude that they must have meant the same when referring to the enemy vessels? You are assuming that Martok meant "combat ships" when he said "vessels", in order to prove that Martok meant "combat ships" when he said "vessels."Alyeska wrote:Unlikely. What do you care that your enemy outnumbers you 20-1 when half of them are non-combat craft? All you care about being outnumbered is the 10-1 combat ships.BTW, he doesn't seem to state which class of vessels he's talking about. The word "vessels" is pretty vague; is he including non-combat support craft?
Moreover, you are still dismissing without cause the possibility that the Romulan didn't bother to perform accurate division and was simply exaggerating. Kirk once described the Klingon/Federation peace accord as "universal peace"; do you interpret this to mean that the Klingons and Federation controlled the entire universe?
If we ignore non-combat support craft such as transports, fuelers, supply ships, etc and disregard small craft such as shuttles, fighters, and runabouts, then how does a loss of 112 ships represent a crippling blow to a fleet of 12,000? I'm sorry, but your explanations of that one are pretty weak, and you know it.
I could buy a fleet of 10-15,000 ships if we're not restricting ourselves to capital warships, but not if we are.
Your preferred interpretation. Not the only one possible, and certainly not consistent with onscreen dialogue describing that fleet as a major linchpin of their hopes for the war.Alyeska wrote:Actually Bashir made the statement that Starfleet couldn't keep taking losses like that. Out of 112 ships, 14 survived. That is a 87% casualty rate. Bashir wasn't referring to the 7th fleet itself as hugely significant loss to the fleet, but the loss of so many ships to few surviving.Darth Wong wrote:I could buy a fleet of 10-15,000 ships if we're not restricting ourselves to capital warships, but not if we are.
Yes they would. Non-combat ships represent the logistical train of your fleet, and without them, you're fucked. You are still employing the circular logic of assuming that they count only combat vessels; in this case, you are assuming that non-combat vessels are useless to the war effort unless they engage in combat! Moreover, you disregard the point made that they did use runabouts, shuttles, and fighters in battle, so you can hardly assume that they are not counted.Furthermore what GAT didn't put in the quote is the fact that the Klingons had to hold the line for the Alliance and they were regarding the ships that Martok could get on the line to defend their borders. As for how powerful support ships are, the Klingons use the same cargo ship the Cardassians did and its most powerful weapon can't even take on a BoP. Changing their shields would be useless because it wouldn't increase their survivability at all.
Darth Wong wrote:Ah, so according to the Romulan (who we assume performed the correct mental math rather than exaggerating), the combined forces of the Breen, the Cardassians, and the Dominion add up to either 22,000 ships or 30,000 ships. This would imply roughly 7,000 to 10,000 ships per group, many of which are relatively small (ie- fighters, 100m long "attack ships", etc).Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Here we go
From DS9 "When it Rains..."
MARTOK: By tomorrow, we'll have eleven hundred Klingon vessels ready for deployment.
ROMULAN: (dismissive) With the Breen, the Cardassians and the Jem'Hadar you're still outnumbered twenty-to-one.
I do believe 1100 was changed to 1500, but I could be wrong.
BTW, he doesn't seem to state which class of vessels he's talking about. The word "vessels" is pretty vague; is he including non-combat support craft?