Posted: 2004-08-22 01:11am
I forsee nukes in the coming chapters. It's an axiom that attacking a SAC bomber leads to glowing in the dark. I sure I won't be disappointed.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
phongn wrote:The Med is going to have 2 CVN-65, 4 CV-41 and 4 CV-9 plus escorts and the amphibious group
Poor Model. Fucked again.phongn wrote:The Med is going to have 2 CVN-65, 4 CV-41 and 4 CV-9 plus escorts and the amphibious group
with a radioactive dick no less.phongn wrote: Or maybe Model will achieve another escape...
Exactly. The epilogue of TBO notes that the Caliphate exists at least until 1989 so I haven't been expecting them to die under nuclear annihilation.RedImperator wrote:The Americans are going to find some solution that lets them save face without burning the Caliphate off the face of the Earth, much as everyone would probably like to see that. Maybe they'll claim it was Model's Janissarries acting alone and merely torch Gaza.
Check the latest timeline update. I don't think the Caliphate lasts to 1989phongn wrote: Exactly. The epilogue of TBO notes that the Caliphate exists at least until 1989 so I haven't been expecting them to die under nuclear annihilation.
I have no idea about the X-15, actually. I do know that the Dyna-Soar project gets full funding in this universe, though.Crayz9000 wrote:Is Stuart going to make mention of the X-15 project, which should have been running since 1959? I'm not sure whether it would fall under Air Force or NASA in this universe, given how NASA is looked down on, but either way it should be based out of Edwards Flight Test Center or NASA Flight Research Center...
And if it's mentioned, things are different enough in this universe that the X-15 should be able to make its 200th flight
No I went back and checked my epilogue......phongn wrote: Exactly. The epilogue of TBO notes that the Caliphate exists at least until 1989 so I haven't been expecting them to die under nuclear annihilation.
MKSheppard wrote:No I went back and checked my epilogue......phongn wrote: Exactly. The epilogue of TBO notes that the Caliphate exists at least until 1989 so I haven't been expecting them to die under nuclear annihilation.
you must be thinking of Chipan.
If he sticks to the epilogue, the Caliphate isn't destroyed. What shape it's in is very much in doubt. I don't think he'll be sticking to the description of it he wrote in that "Nations of the TBO universe" thread a while back.TBO: Epilogue wrote:As Dedmon had feared so many years ago, once the cult of terrorism and suicide bombing had started it was proving terribly hard to root out. The simmering Cold War in the Pacific had been another – and there were rumors that Chipan and the Caliphate states were becoming closely aligned.
Hrm, maybe you could pop in and ask a question about that, but the Dyna-Soar was something like the next step after the X-15.Crayz9000 wrote:Well, if SAC is transitioning to space as the timeline suggests, and their bomber force is going with them, they'll need atmosphere-skipping bombers, and the X-15 was basically THE hypersonic testbed project. In our timeline, we only just touched the realm of powered hypersonic flight again with the X-43A.
It mentioned ties between Chipan and the Caliphate states.MKSheppard wrote:No I went back and checked my epilogue......
you must be thinking of Chipan.
No, he's right:MKSheppard wrote:No I went back and checked my epilogue......
you must be thinking of Chipan.
Too bad. I wanted to see the Caliphate glow in the dark.TBO Epilogue wrote:and there were rumors that Chipan and the Caliphate states were becoming closely aligned.
It's because damned McNamara wanted to be rid of bombers out of the inventory once and for all, and what better way than to get them so vulnerable that being shot down is inevitable, and manipulate that to try to show just how "useless" and "vulnerable" those bombers are?Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Re-reading these "Rules of Engagement" why would the altitude be restricted to below 40 000 feet? Wouldn't it be a crime to be low???
It probably has something to due with the throttle settings needed to exceed that altitude. The B-58 doesn't have that big a wing to keep down drag, so it may need to go supersonic to exceed 40,000 feet.Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Re-reading these "Rules of Engagement" why would the altitude be restricted to below 40 000 feet? Wouldn't it be a crime to be low???