If you open fire on UAR shipping then the UAR is left with little to no choice but to employ its public doctrine of massive retaliation. As it is the world course of action has amounted to an attempt at a naval blockade of UAR shipping, an act of war in and of its self already. You’ve shut Saddamistan and now the UAR out of a nation just 50 miles away from it, and then gone an meddled in its internal affairs on a far more massive scale. Its clearly an attempt to encircle and strangle the UAR, and you think we would not launch a war to prevent it from being enforced when we have far more megatonnage then anyone else could?Stas Bush wrote: With WHICH situation, Skimmer? You are going to nuke the world for the arrest of Tonkin's ships? Or your ships for that matter?
Really we are hardly demanding anything unreasonable here, just ocean access for our shipping and an equal right to meddle in a foreign land everyone else has been feasting over for years now, while still failing to bring about any real peace progress too boot.
If the world didn’t constantly make demands and try to strangle Saddamistan in particular it might even go so far as to unilaterally, abet secretly, destroy its biological weapons stockpiles as no longer necessary in ordered to save money on delivery systems and storage.