Re: The Salvation War: Pantheocide. Part Thirteen Up
Posted: 2009-06-24 01:26pm
Did we just get a cameo appearance from The Seer? I'm also curious to see how the second conspiracy plays out.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
The Targeteer is StuartHawkwings wrote:I'm confused as to who the "targeteer" is.
My list of protagonists has now expanded to encompass Uriel and Lemuel. I really hope you can work in some great detective-story feel into that plot.
Why is there a difference between the two?There's something else here people, and we're missing it."
Stuart's character. The Targeteer was the one who explained to Abigor what humanity might do to Dis back in Armageddon.Hawkwings wrote:I'm confused as to who the "targeteer" is.
Most of the words here have distinct meanings in hebrew (even old Hebrew) which do not exactly fit as angel types. For example, Ishim is people, Malachim is simply "angels". What gives? Is this some characteristic of names in the New Testament?Angels, Ishim, Elohim, Malachim, even Seraphim and one Hashmallim involved.
During the middle ages, the church drammatically expanded its' pantheon of angels and drew on Judaic and other sources for inspiration. 'Ishim' is derived from the description of the angels given in Ezikiel 23, and have been declared to be the heralds of snow and fire.Ace Pace wrote:Quick question regarding Angel types.Most of the words here have distinct meanings in hebrew (even old Hebrew) which do not exactly fit as angel types. For example, Ishim is people, Malachim is simply "angels". What gives? Is this some characteristic of names in the New Testament?Angels, Ishim, Elohim, Malachim, even Seraphim and one Hashmallim involved.
I'm sure I would put a tinfoil hat on our cat.The targeteer thought for a second. "I wonder if there's an eccentric old lady in El Paso who put a tinfoil hat on her much-beloved little dog? And, if there is, I bet that dog is still alive."
Strays wouldn't have hats on them (or keep them on, for that matter), and it didn't exactly occur to most people that the EMP that baldricks use to influence people would also work on animals. Also, wouldn't the foiled houses give at least some protection to animals living in them? Surely when Surlethe said that every animal died, he was talking about the ones outside the protective buildings? And if they died inside the buildings, why didn't the building protect them, but kept safe the human residents, who wouldn't have the caps on all the time anyway?JN1 wrote:I'm sure I would put a tinfoil hat on our cat.The targeteer thought for a second. "I wonder if there's an eccentric old lady in El Paso who put a tinfoil hat on her much-beloved little dog? And, if there is, I bet that dog is still alive."
Is this suppose to imply that those small number of names are in Michael's original conspiracy group?Stuart wrote:DIMO(N) Conference Room, The Pentagon, May 2009
Looking at his chart, Lemuel-Lan-Michael found his eyes drawn to the small number of names on Ishmael's list that were not linked to the conspiracy he had uncovered.
There might be something going on here besides simple shielding vs Uriel's mind powers. What if it has to do with education? Rational thought is a uniquely human invention. Humans possess this ability, but animals simply do not. What's more, it is a product of human civilization not genetics. In other words, it is taught, not inherited. What if those who have a greater capacity for rational thought are more resistant to the effect? As you move into first-world nations, you run into areas where nearly 100% of the population has received years of formal schooling.Eulogy wrote:Strays wouldn't have hats on them (or keep them on, for that matter), and it didn't exactly occur to most people that the EMP that baldricks use to influence people would also work on animals. Also, wouldn't the foiled houses give at least some protection to animals living in them? Surely when Surlethe said that every animal died, he was talking about the ones outside the protective buildings? And if they died inside the buildings, why didn't the building protect them, but kept safe the human residents, who wouldn't have the caps on all the time anyway?
That's exactly what I was thinking. Perhaps the effect has something to do with images or thoughts being projected into the mind of the victim. Someone with the ability to think rationally may be more likely to be able to overcome the effect. That may be why Uriel speaks of different levels of resistance. Additionally, this mechanism neatly explains all of the data points including the crazy old rich conspiracy theorist who died.Darth Wong wrote:There might be something going on here besides simple shielding vs Uriel's mind powers. What if it has to do with education? Rational thought is a uniquely human invention. Humans possess this ability, but animals simply do not. What's more, it is a product of human civilization not genetics. In other words, it is taught, not inherited. What if those who have a greater capacity for rational thought are more resistant to the effect? As you move into first-world nations, you run into areas where nearly 100% of the population has received years of formal schooling.
That's a very interesting idea.Darth Wong wrote:There might be something going on here besides simple shielding vs Uriel's mind powers. What if it has to do with education? Rational thought is a uniquely human invention. Humans possess this ability, but animals simply do not. What's more, it is a product of human civilization not genetics. In other words, it is taught, not inherited. What if those who have a greater capacity for rational thought are more resistant to the effect? As you move into first-world nations, you run into areas where nearly 100% of the population has received years of formal schooling.
Good question. I'm wondering that, too, if just because of his knowledge of weapons and whatnot. If Heaven gets seven years to play with, I could see them at least being able to hold their own against an invasion for a while.Pelranius wrote:Interesting to see that there's a second conspiracy. I sort of ignored Occam's Razor by assuming that some humans had managed to open a portal into heaven with the Big 15 as a whole being any wiser.
Where is Belial anyways? I'm sort of missing the old coot.
It depends. There appears to be a revolution of the proletariat on the horizon and Michael might be too busy to decide wheter or not to join the forces of reaction than to kill of Lemuel. Not to mention that Lemuel might start getting a little paranoid and take steps to prevent any assassians from getting to him. Since he knows that the humans have hell and demons can shape-change he won't be entirely unprepared.iborg wrote:I'm afraid that Lemuel's a little too effective for his own good and will suffer an "unfortunate accident" in the future.
Good point.Darth Wong wrote:There might be something going on here besides simple shielding vs Uriel's mind powers. What if it has to do with education? Rational thought is a uniquely human invention. Humans possess this ability, but animals simply do not. What's more, it is a product of human civilization not genetics. In other words, it is taught, not inherited. What if those who have a greater capacity for rational thought are more resistant to the effect? As you move into first-world nations, you run into areas where nearly 100% of the population has received years of formal schooling.
Was that religious group some sort of Confucianist sect? I think it was mentioned that Asians percentage wise had a smaller die off (though there are obvious candidates for sudden extinction level events like the Moonies and Falungong) and one of the characters speculated that Asians might be genetically less inclined to be religious.GrayAnderson wrote:Well, I might offer a second thought in this vein: The low-hanging fruit has already been killed off. Lots of the people who were susceptible to divine "die now" commands died from the Message (which took a decent number of people with it, after all). Thus, kill orders that should be netting 5-15% are only getting 1% or less.
In this vein, I would be interested to see if there were any effects in that regard with the Message. My inclination is that there would be at least some effects in that regard (the rational thought thing; I recall some religious group or another wasn't affected by the Message because of rational thought and analysis of what came from the message).
I would also be interested, in keeping with this, to see if there is an increased effect w.r.t. infant mortality and/or effects on children. Under that umbrella, did the Message have any increased impact among those under some age line (say, under age 5, 7, or 10) where rational thought isn't nearly as well-developed (and where belief in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy is quite pervasive)?
Pelranius wrote: Was that religious group some sort of Confucianist sect? I think it was mentioned that Asians percentage wise had a smaller die off (though there are obvious candidates for sudden extinction level events like the Moonies and Falungong) and one of the characters speculated that Asians might be genetically less inclined to be religious.
Which makes me wonder how much of the Philippine population just laid down and died in the world of The Salvation War. There are a lot of Catholic fundies in the Philippines, especially among the poor majority and most of the middle class, and several belong to other Christian sects and local Catholic off-shoots tend to be even more extreme in their beliefs. At least, in my experience. I wonder if the TSW-verse Philippines just reeled from a tremendous die-off.MarshalPurnell wrote:I don't recall any speculation that Asians are genetically inclined to be less religious, though it's been a long time since I read Armageddon in full. If Asia had less die-off it's obviously because so many fewer Asians believe in Abrahamic religions than Westerners and Middle Easterners. The religious sect was Quakers, though, mentioned to be helping out in Hell recovering victims to remain true to their pacifist principles.