Page 6 of 6
Posted: 2002-10-31 09:22pm
by oberon
Uh, if you're calling me a CS guy, I'm not. I'm a bio major
I wasn't :p
Happy Hallowe'en
Posted: 2002-11-01 11:41am
by D.Turtle
Damn, I should use quotes.
Try #2:
Necronlord wrote:Try to get this. IF the klingons want to charge in waving their bladed weapons. Then the earthlings WILL NOT HAVE GUNS It is easily within Klingon capacity to transport away refined metals. Remember they had site-to-site transport capacity in ST:4. If they were attacking with Bat'leths then the defenders weapons would be in orbit...
And we've seen them do this in ST how often?
Posted: 2002-11-01 01:07pm
by Yogi
D.Turtle wrote:And we've seen them do this in ST how often?
Charging in with Bat'leths or using Transporters to disable their opponent's weapons?
Posted: 2002-11-01 04:12pm
by D.Turtle
Using Transporters to transport away their enemy's weapons.
Posted: 2002-11-01 06:13pm
by oberon
If they could do that, then they could re-materialize enemy weapons inside the enemies' bodies.
Posted: 2002-11-01 07:15pm
by TheDarkling
We know from Nor the Battle to the Strong that the Klingons always setup transporter inhibitors when they go into battle (probably a standard in ST ground combat) - they would only do this is transporters at least had some combat applications, against an enemy that had no transporters or ways to block them I see no reason to doubt they would use it.