Page 6 of 11

Posted: 2004-10-14 08:37am
by Vympel
fgalkin wrote: Did you follow my advice?

P.S. Killed off the Greeks. Take that, Brutii! :twisted: Before that, I killed Carthage, too.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
My faction leader's army is a bit under strength right now- I'm laying siege to what I believe is the last city of Pontus. They have chariots behind the walls, the city is such that the tactic is ... suboptimal.

Posted: 2004-10-14 10:02am
by Pablo Sanchez
Vympel wrote:That's just too wasteful- skirmishers and incendiary pigs, trust me.
I don't like the fact that you have to go through crap like that in RTW to counteract elephants. Do you know how the Romans actually neutralized Hannibal's elephants? They moved slightly to either side and the elephants ran past them and off the battlefield. No shit.

Posted: 2004-10-14 10:10am
by fgalkin
Pablo Sanchez wrote:
Vympel wrote:That's just too wasteful- skirmishers and incendiary pigs, trust me.
I don't like the fact that you have to go through crap like that in RTW to counteract elephants. Do you know how the Romans actually neutralized Hannibal's elephants? They moved slightly to either side and the elephants ran past them and off the battlefield. No shit.
While being harassed with javelins and pila from the sides and back. Which made them, in game terms, "run amok". You're free to do that in the game, too.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Posted: 2004-10-14 11:43am
by Vympel
Pablo Sanchez wrote:
I don't like the fact that you have to go through crap like that in RTW to counteract elephants. Do you know how the Romans actually neutralized Hannibal's elephants? They moved slightly to either side and the elephants ran past them and off the battlefield. No shit.
Yeah, I know. Maybe loose formation is the equivalent? Buggered if I know.

Posted: 2004-10-14 11:45am
by Chardok
Hey, how the hell come whenever I get into a battle, The enemy like...takes my charge head on, whether it's from the flanks or front or whatever, I kill ten billion of their guys, they kill 3 of my footsoldiers, and my guys fucking cut and run. In fact, I lose every goddamned battle where I don't outnumber the enemy 10 to 1 or force them to run by improper use of my siege engines.

Posted: 2004-10-14 11:55am
by Vympel
You are clearly doing something catastrophically wrong- but you're not being specific enough.

Posted: 2004-10-14 12:02pm
by wautd
FOR FOR SAKE! I DONT UNDERSTAND SOME PEOPLE

At another forum I posted about RTW and most people reply something like "battles seems nice but that graphics are so so"

THEY EXPECT FUCKING DOOM III GRAPHICS WHEN ZOOMED IN EVEN AFTER I TOLD YOU CAN PLAY WITH 1000'S OF SOLDIERS AT ONCE8 :evil:

Posted: 2004-10-14 12:05pm
by Captain Cyran
Right now I've just been playing the Demo over and over again. Once I get the money I will definately be buying this game though.

Posted: 2004-10-14 12:21pm
by Hotfoot
wautd wrote:FOR FOR SAKE! I DONT UNDERSTAND SOME PEOPLE

At another forum I posted about RTW and most people reply something like "battles seems nice but that graphics are so so"

THEY EXPECT FUCKING DOOM III GRAPHICS WHEN ZOOMED IN EVEN AFTER I TOLD YOU CAN PLAY WITH 1000'S OF SOLDIERS AT ONCE8 :evil:
Rome is a great game, but it's not for everyone. Some people I know swear by Dawn of War, others by Warcraft 3, both of which have superior graphics quality over Rome. They like that style of game better, for their own reasons. They also likely enjoy the frentic base-building and micromanagement games like that have. Rome is a much more relaxed game in that regard. You can pause it in the middle of a battle in order to give orders more efficiently, and then there is the campaign itself, which is pure TBS, and thus not everyone's cup of tea.

When you sit down to play Rome's singleplayer game, you sit down to manage an empire, and to occasionally orchestrate battles to maintain or expand said empire. In other games, the singleplayer game is a string of missions connected by a storyline that you tend to have very little control over. Both can be insanely fun, but not everyone is drawn to one type or the other.

Posted: 2004-10-14 01:29pm
by fgalkin
Chardok wrote:Hey, how the hell come whenever I get into a battle, The enemy like...takes my charge head on, whether it's from the flanks or front or whatever, I kill ten billion of their guys, they kill 3 of my footsoldiers, and my guys fucking cut and run. In fact, I lose every goddamned battle where I don't outnumber the enemy 10 to 1 or force them to run by improper use of my siege engines.
1. Which faction are you playing?
2. Which faction are you fighting?
3. What units are you using?
4. What exactly are you doing in said battle? Give a step by step description of the battle, please.

P.S. There's no such thing as an "improper" use of siege engines. :P

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Posted: 2004-10-14 02:41pm
by Captain Cyran
fgalkin wrote:P.S. There's no such thing as an "improper" use of siege engines. :P

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Yes there is. It's called not using them. :wink:

Posted: 2004-10-14 02:47pm
by fgalkin
Captain_Cyran wrote:
fgalkin wrote:P.S. There's no such thing as an "improper" use of siege engines. :P

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Yes there is. It's called not using them. :wink:
There's no such thing as an "improper" use of siege engines.
:P

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Posted: 2004-10-14 02:58pm
by Captain Cyran
fgalkin wrote:
Captain_Cyran wrote:
fgalkin wrote:P.S. There's no such thing as an "improper" use of siege engines. :P

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Yes there is. It's called not using them. :wink:
There's no such thing as an "improper" use of siege engines.
:P

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Bah! Ok then, using them on your own troops... no, no, that still looks amazingly sweet.

Posted: 2004-10-14 03:10pm
by Arthur_Tuxedo
wautd wrote:I just found this screenshot. Is this the coolest screeny ever? :shock:

http://www.twcenter.net/forums/index.ph ... &id=191122

Tag edit - Phong
Gah! I wonder what his framerate is.

In what folder does R:TW keep the screenies you take, anyway?

Posted: 2004-10-14 03:30pm
by fgalkin
No, this is the bset R:TW screenshot ever.

Image

And yes, it is real.

Another reason why RTW rocks!

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Posted: 2004-10-14 04:10pm
by The Cleric
"All your base are belong to us!" Oh man, I can't wait.

Posted: 2004-10-14 04:18pm
by Rogue 9

Posted: 2004-10-14 07:57pm
by The Cleric
[innocent]What did I say?[/innocent]

Edited to make the mods happy. And no, I don't mind. It's their board, they can run it how they please.

Posted: 2004-10-14 09:57pm
by fgalkin
StormtrooperOfDeath wrote:I need help "mounting" the game or whatever fgalkin had to do to get his to work. Anyone? Anyone? Buler?
Pssst. Breaking board rules=bad.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Posted: 2004-10-14 10:04pm
by Arrow
Thanks for not paying the software engineers, artists, managers and sales staffs for their hard work. :x :evil:

Posted: 2004-10-15 12:30am
by The Yosemite Bear
yesss, tempted am I by the darkside, yesss, buy rome total war, and my journey shall be complete...

now where do I get to cut someone's hand off....

Posted: 2004-10-15 01:11am
by fgalkin
Germania is crushed! Bwahahaha!

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Posted: 2004-10-15 03:21am
by wautd
Hotfoot wrote:
wautd wrote:FOR FOR SAKE! I DONT UNDERSTAND SOME PEOPLE

At another forum I posted about RTW and most people reply something like "battles seems nice but that graphics are so so"

THEY EXPECT FUCKING DOOM III GRAPHICS WHEN ZOOMED IN EVEN AFTER I TOLD YOU CAN PLAY WITH 1000'S OF SOLDIERS AT ONCE8 :evil:
Rome is a great game, but it's not for everyone. Some people I know swear by Dawn of War, others by Warcraft 3, both of which have superior graphics quality over Rome. They like that style of game better, for their own reasons. They also likely enjoy the frentic base-building and micromanagement games like that have. Rome is a much more relaxed game in that regard. You can pause it in the middle of a battle in order to give orders more efficiently, and then there is the campaign itself, which is pure TBS, and thus not everyone's cup of tea.

When you sit down to play Rome's singleplayer game, you sit down to manage an empire, and to occasionally orchestrate battles to maintain or expand said empire. In other games, the singleplayer game is a string of missions connected by a storyline that you tend to have very little control over. Both can be insanely fun, but not everyone is drawn to one type or the other.
That wasnt the point. They were only bitching about the not-so-great graphics when zoomed in

Posted: 2004-10-15 09:54am
by Chardok
Ha1 I figgured out why I was losing! MY general was a drunkard and a coward! I got pissed and sent his bodyguard unit solo up against another generals..wel.....army. He was slaughtered and my army bolted. then his son took over and he's like a completely hardcore badass. I got him some good experience by laying siege to a city.

I placed my siege engines outside and used greek fire, burning the city to the ground around the enemy army (Not the whole city, but I took out the governors mansion just to demoralize them, and left the walls standing. then, after I burned it to the ground, I withdrew my army and came back the next day, using archers, siege engines and javelin-tossers to rake their army. Most of them were decimated before I even walked into the city. then I killed every last one of them and exterminated the populace upon my victory (In retalliation for killing my first general.) The day is won.

Posted: 2004-10-15 10:04am
by wautd
One of my generals bodyguard had in a townfight only the general and 1 bodyguard left. They kept slashing on enemie units while they were fighting against my infantry. You literally saw the experience increase every 5 seconds. In the end they had 3 of those gold stripes :o