Hyperion, conscription age is 18+, and you are allowed to vote at 18. Used to be that you could volunteer at 17, but that was changed because it violated certain treaties and the declaration of human rights and other inconvenient stuff that say words to the effect that no adult duties before adult rights too. We actually had one 17-year-old volunteer in our platoon, and he was one of the better soldiers, and a cool guy to boot.
Knife, Rob, I don't regret having been in the military, even if there was some shit involved. I survived, and like Knife said, if it doesn't kill you, it'll make you stronger (tobacco and drugs excepted). Most of the people were okay, but it doesn't take more than two or three people in the same platoon to make things more difficult for whoever they choose to pick as their target.
The problem with conscription is, like I said, that many people only do their military service because it's required of them, and will try to get away with the absolute minimum they can. They're used to getting things their way, not having to do what they're told to do and challenging authority (not necessarily always a bad thing in itself) and having no responsibility. So take a couple of hundred young men, most unwilling or indifferent, from all sorts of backgrounds, and we have what is the typical pool of recruits in a given unit.
The hardest part for them is that the NCOs in the Finnish Army are all conscripts also, except for the Sergeant Majors or whatever the guys just above sergeant are called in the US and British armies. Those NCOs are responsible for much of the training (supervised by officers, of course), and they have the authority to give orders, even unpleasant ones, and the means to enforce those orders. Sometimes the NCO is younger than the recruit (or private, after boot camp period), and having to obey really gets people's goat. Typically the people who are irritated by it are the ones who were never set much limits at home.
This irritation typically manifests itself as sloppy work, slow response to orders and bad attitudes, which invariably result in the offending persons getting a chewing out and having to do it all over again, which just increases their bad attitude and fosters an "us vs. them" mentality, because the idiots never bother to look at whether their own actions were the cause of it. Fucktards...
I never had a problem with the NCOs. I went into the military knowing that I'd be taught to be a soldier and that I'd be expected to follow orders. So I did what I was told, when I was told, as well as I could, and most of the time it was good enough so that I didn't have to do it again, and I even got praised at times. This didn't go down well with some of the slackers so I became a target. Not that I wasn't somewhat at fault myself, I did some stupid things during the first few weeks that irritated some people for good reasons, but I changed that behavior and left it behind.
Of course, in a conscript army the quality of leadership becomes especially important, especially on part of the NCOs. The officers and the sergeant majors can't be everywhere at once and at all times and work regular hours instead of being confined to base like the conscripts, and if the corporals and sergeants fuck up or abuse their position, the results are bad and really set the grunts against them.
We had this sort of bad NCOs for the first three and a half months (back then, in 1996-97) our company was trained for that period, boot camp and basic MP stuff, in another city and then transferred to Helsinki, and the NCOs there were basically the worst of the previous batch. The ones who did best got to pick their assignment, either training the new recruits, or overseeing the rest of us in Helsinki, and most picked Helsinki. Has to be said that the whole command structure back in Hämeenlinna was riddled with infighting, jealousies and a who-gives-a-damn attitude as well as contempt for soft city-boys (all recruits in our company were from Helsinki, since the unit was essentially a defense one for the capital), and that was very visible. Not back then, but after the move to Helsinki. One of the officers in 3rd Platoon actually asked what the hell was wrong with us all because we acted like we were scared of the officers and jumped every time one came near, even if he just passed by.
By contrast, in Helsinki it was all different. Food was better, the officers were nice guys (with a couple of exceptions), even the company XO who was a mean bastard and would chew you out the second you did something wrong even in a minor way, but he was of the opinion that a conscript had to prove himself first. One had to
earn his respect. Once you did, he was really okay. I actually got to toss him around the training gym before an exhibition of self-defense techniques for some high brass, he asked if anyone knew judo or jujutsu and wanted to have a bout. He wound up on his ass and in a chokehold both times...
The NCOs were nicer too, and not as stuck up. There was a brief period of trouble when the guys who'd been grunts with us came and took charge from the departing NCOs, but that sorted out pretty well. We had it good, 1st Platoon got four nice guys and only one asshole, and that one was not originally 1st, but 3rd Platoon. Two of them were nice guys who were also friends with lots of us, and so we did everything we were told without complaints. One was also a nice guy, but hadn't the touch for leadership, so he was always driven to distraction by some people's antics, but he also never had trouble. One was a true leader, he was always impartial and fair, nice as a person and everybody (aside from the discipline problem cases) always immediately jumped to when he gave orders. The asshole was hated by everyone. Seemed okay, but turned real nasty in just a couple of months. Nothing was ever good for him, he'd yell at people and insult them for no reason, you'd get publicly chewed out for asking clarification for ambiguous orders or requesting permission for something that required permission from an NCO to be done but had to be done anyway. Needless to say, he got the recalcitrance routine from
everyone.
So, good leadership is bloody important, but if it's there, you can do quite a lot with a bunch of conscripts who've had some training.
Anyway, I have a lot of memories from those nine and a half months, and most of them are good. The bad stuff was mostly toward the end, with everybody's frustration mounting due to a shitty string of training exercises in foul weather, few leave weekends, a very surly sergeant major (the biggest asshole of the professional soldiers in the company) and a desire to just have done with the army.
Sorry if I bored anyone with this, but seeing as most of the military people here are from countries that have all volunteer professional armies, I thought you'd be interested in the comparison. A professional military is not a luxury a nation the size of Finland cannot afford. Just look at the population size and compare that to geographical size to see what I mean...
Edi