Page 52 of 76

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-17 10:08pm
by Lonestar
oh, whoops

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-17 10:08pm
by Lonestar
what referral code?

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-18 06:44am
by Thanas
http://playtogether.worldofwarships.com/

Get somebody from here to invite you :)

Also try to redeem this for free premium time:
ILOVEWARSHIPS

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-18 07:28am
by Thanas
Also: The British T10 is pure sex. 2.8 seconds reload.

I was able to solo and kill two full health Gearings in less than thirty seconds.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-23 01:24am
by Lonestar
I got cussed out yesterday like you wouldn't believe by a Fuso when he got too close and, with my NY only at 10% or so health, I rammed his ass and killed us both.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-23 07:17am
by Thanas
If you do not get flamed or reported at least two times a day you are playing the game wrong.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-23 07:44am
by Lonestar
Well I got a "JESUS CHRIST DO SOMETHING CV" the other day, I have a Bogue with two fighter squadrons and one dive bomber, was facing a Bogue that obviously had the two TBs and one dive bomber mod, and had at that point shot down 25 aircraft.

As far as I could tell he was complaining about one individual TB that hit him.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-26 06:09am
by wautd
So I have a ton of free XP. If you could skip one Tier VII ship, which would it be and why? I have the choice between skipping a Pensacola, Colorado and Gneisenau. I heard the first two aren't that great and are hard to grind, while the Gneisenau might be OK but I'd rather be in a Bismarck

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-26 08:05am
by Vendetta
The Pensacola is made of tissue paper and citadels, and so big it's visible from orbit.

It is, therefore, every battleship's favourite thing to shoot ever.

(Though it's the only line I've played up that far, so I have no points of comparison)

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-26 10:12am
by Raesene
There are also rumors that the upcoming USS Missouri can only be acquired by spending free XPs

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-26 10:27am
by Thanas
wautd wrote:So I have a ton of free XP. If you could skip one Tier VII ship, which would it be and why? I have the choice between skipping a Pensacola, Colorado and Gneisenau. I heard the first two aren't that great and are hard to grind, while the Gneisenau might be OK but I'd rather be in a Bismarck
Save your freeXP because by all accounts the Missouri will be hilariously OP and will only be obtainable by freeXP.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-26 10:34am
by wautd
Raesene wrote:There are also rumors that the upcoming USS Missouri can only be acquired by spending free XPs
OK I didn't knew that. Might as well wait for that then

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-26 02:31pm
by Venator
Lonestar wrote:I got cussed out yesterday like you wouldn't believe by a Fuso when he got too close and, with my NY only at 10% or so health, I rammed his ass and killed us both.
It's a perfectly legitimate strategy if you're outnumbered, cornered, and/or too low on health to escape or out-trade. The onus is always on the guy with more HP left to take away enemy HP while denying the enemy kills.
Vendetta wrote:The Pensacola is made of tissue paper and citadels, and so big it's visible from orbit.

It is, therefore, every battleship's favourite thing to shoot ever.

(Though it's the only line I've played up that far, so I have no points of comparison)
"The New Orleans has more armour than the Pensacola, but, well, the Ford Fiesta also has more armour than the Pensacola." -- Jingles

To be honest, I think Pepsi players let themselves down much more than the armour does. I catch them broadside on, at constant speed, in every game.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-27 04:11am
by Thanas
Hey if anybody want to toss me a referral for the NA server feel free to do so and get yourself some rewards. First to quote this gets it.

Venator wrote: "The New Orleans has more armour than the Pensacola, but, well, the Ford Fiesta also has more armour than the Pensacola." -- Jingles
Jingles barely knows the game, it has gotten to the point where his commentary gives me cancer.
To be honest, I think Pepsi players let themselves down much more than the armour does. I catch them broadside on, at constant speed, in every game.
Yep. It really is a shame that while all other nations have two ships immediately following each other to show you that this is a bad idea (German Königsberg/Nürnberg, Japan Kuma - Furutaka - Aoba, Britain - the entire line, USSR ditto) the USA goes from squishy Omaha to tanky cleveland and thus most players forget the lessons as the cleveland does not really suffer a lot from "Sudden and instant deletion".

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-27 11:40am
by Venator
Thanas wrote:Hey if anybody want to toss me a referral for the NA server feel free to do so and get yourself some rewards. First to quote this gets it.
Can has?
Venator wrote: "The New Orleans has more armour than the Pensacola, but, well, the Ford Fiesta also has more armour than the Pensacola." -- Jingles
Jingles barely knows the game, it has gotten to the point where his commentary gives me cancer.
The big problem is that he doesn't seem to ever check stats or patch notes, at least till halfway through grinding a given ship. He banged on about the lost RoF from the Farragut to Mahan for ages after they had changed both ships. I tend to tune out stats when I watch, that's what Flammu, iChase, DezGames, etc. are for when I want to watch something accurate (and kinda boring).

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-27 12:46pm
by Thanas
PM'd you the email.
Venator wrote:The big problem is that he doesn't seem to ever check stats or patch notes, at least till halfway through grinding a given ship.
If you look at his stats it is pretty clear he barely plays the game at all.

This is his account. He has less than 300 games in total. (K, he also has a press account but that cannot be many more games than that). He has no T8 ship that is not a premium. Nothing above T7. It is pretty clear that the game is just a vehicle to make money of for him.
He banged on about the lost RoF from the Farragut to Mahan for ages after they had changed both ships. I tend to tune out stats when I watch, that's what Flammu, iChase, DezGames, etc. are for when I want to watch something accurate (and kinda boring).
I find his gameplay just grating. Look at his Mahan video. Starts about 7:30 in.
He has no clue whatsoever how to play a gunboat DD.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-27 01:36pm
by Sea Skimmer
Been a long time since I watched one of his videos because he so blatantly sucks, but he used to not even fire half the salvos he could.

I found the Pensacola was okay, I just needs to follow around a fast battleship and set whatever that battleship wants dead on fire. I sank very little but did tremendous amounts of damage that way, having equal fore and aft firepower is very helpful for such tactics.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-27 03:18pm
by Venator
I think it shows that I usually have him as background sound and barely watch the video unless it's a KV-2 montage (laptop somehow blew the wall-to-adapter cable, scavenged a cable from my other monitor... that's another story). Skimmed through that Mahan vid and a couple others... wow. Wow. That's actually frustrating to watch.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-29 08:36am
by Thanas
So a few observations:

- the US server is much more customer friendly. The amount of specials they have...wow. Cashcow EU I guess.
- the players on the US server are mentally challenged beyond belief. BBs refusing to lissten to simple tactics, DDs picking gunfights with cruisers...wow. Just wow. Not even playing T1 or T2 on the EU server is approaching this level. Holy shit. I have even given up being civil as they don't fucking seem to listen unless there are at least three insults thrown in.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-29 10:24am
by Imperial528
To be fair, most cruisers are brain dead on NA such that a halfway decent DD can pick a gunfight with them and win.

Problem being the DD is often brain dead too.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-29 12:50pm
by Venator
Welcome to my world!
Imperial528 wrote:To be fair, most cruisers are brain dead on NA such that a halfway decent DD can pick a gunfight with them and win.

Problem being the DD is often brain dead too.
That's why my US DD learning curve was so erratic. I used to YOLO Clevelands because, rolling the dice, you had decent odds of it actually working.

Just the other day, I had an Isokaze and a Derpsky pull off a flawless bait-and-strafe ambush on me - Derpsky came out of a smokescreen and cross-launched his entire payload at the same moment as the Isokaze from the other side, both from about 1.5-2km away.

I killed both and got away with about 30% HP. In the Kaiser.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-29 03:37pm
by Lonestar
Imperial528 wrote:To be fair, most cruisers are brain dead on NA such that a halfway decent DD can pick a gunfight with them and win.

Problem being the DD is often brain dead too.
hi it's me

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-30 08:16am
by Lonestar
Man so most images are blocked at work(which is when I usually browse SDN) so I didn't really see the sort of damage levels and XP people were making in this thread.

I am nto the sort of guy you would want in charge of a warship.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-30 10:02am
by Thanas
Lonestar wrote:Man so most images are blocked at work(which is when I usually browse SDN) so I didn't really see the sort of damage levels and XP people were making in this thread.

I am nto the sort of guy you would want in charge of a warship.

Eh, it is a learning curve. Don't be discouraged by it. I was a total potato until I hit 600 games.

Re: World of Warships

Posted: 2016-11-30 02:30pm
by Imperial528
https://na.warships.today/player/1003083693/Imperial528

For what it's worth, those are my stats, and I consider myself pretty mediocre all things considered.