It's funny though, one of the spokeswomen at the hospital described all law enforcement as one big family that protects each other... you know, like the Mafia.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
weemadando wrote:Seems a Marshals service air unit just reported positive ID on the suspect.
Lots of other units heading into the area, Command trucks and air units ferrying SWAT teams have been on the feed a bit.
Given there's already been officers injured in this exchange I can't see this ending well.
Also, if you live anywhere near Big Bear, sounds like ALL the roads are getting closed.
Dorner had numerous problems at the police academy and as a probation officer before his accusation and subsquent firing.GoldenBough wrote:I was really hoping he'd end up turning himself in at an FBI office, and riding the media coverage into a shit-show for the LAPD.
I read the manifesto, and while I agree that he has a couple bolts loose, he doesn't seem "crazy" in the usual sense of the word. I can't condone the killings in any way. Period. It's the wrong response, and there's no justification for it. Beyond that, the institutionalized thuggery of the LAPD is a problem. Internal investigations are a joke. The board that found his complaint baseless had 2 members who were directly associated with the subject of the complaint, and declined to rescue themselves from the proceedings. The man turned in $8,000 cash he found in a bag. Does he seem like the kind of cop that was unfit for duty, or more like the honest kind that just couldn't hack it in the current system we've allowed to develop in LA? The man has some serious, and likely HIGHLY accurate complaints about the system. He just went about resolving them in a very poor manner.
Do you have the relevant info for this?General Mung Beans wrote:Dorner had numerous problems at the police academy and as a probation officer before his accusation and subsquent firing.
Can you provide information regarding what these issues were? He brought them up himself in his manifesto, along with his side of the story. Because the LAPD has a nice history of drumming out whistle blowers and people who won't go along with the system.General Mung Beans wrote:Dorner had numerous problems at the police academy and as a probation officer before his accusation and subsquent firing.
I guess you haven't been around a lot of "crazy" people. Just because someone is mentally ill does not mean that they aren't capable of influencing people, being articulate, writing, or planning. It really depends on what condition they're suffering from.GoldenBough wrote:I was really hoping he'd end up turning himself in at an FBI office, and riding the media coverage into a shit-show for the LAPD.
I read the manifesto, and while I agree that he has a couple bolts loose, he doesn't seem "crazy" in the usual sense of the word.
Yeah, the LAPD has a very dirty reputation that will take decades to improve.I can't condone the killings in any way. Period. It's the wrong response, and there's no justification for it. Beyond that, the institutionalized thuggery of the LAPD is a problem. Internal investigations are a joke.
I didn't realize that Dorner's manifesto was considered truth. That might be true that two of the board members were friends of the accused and if so certainly does cast doubt on their decisions, however, according to one of the earlier articles Dorner's claim and that of the victim were found to be baseless because of three independent witnesses. At this point the LAPD should release that findings of this investigation to the media and if those witnesses are willing they should share their story with the media.The board that found his complaint baseless had 2 members who were directly associated with the subject of the complaint, and declined to rescue themselves from the proceedings.
SourceFrom Source wrote: Three witnesses – two hotel employees and a port police officer – testified that they did not see the kicks and Gettler’s account of events, which included being kicked, were ruled to lack credibility. According to Gettler’s father, the Los Angeles Times noted, “his son’s mental illness prevented him from being a good witness and that he was easily scared and would often answer ‘yes’ to everything.”
Uh yeah. His actions today show that he is unfit for duty. Just because he went off on other police officers instead of civilians does not change this.The man turned in $8,000 cash he found in a bag. Does he seem like the kind of cop that was unfit for duty, or more like the honest kind that just couldn't hack it in the current system we've allowed to develop in LA? The man has some serious, and likely HIGHLY accurate complaints about the system. He just went about resolving them in a very poor manner.
Here:Havok wrote:Do you have the relevant info for this?General Mung Beans wrote:Dorner had numerous problems at the police academy and as a probation officer before his accusation and subsquent firing.
A few days into training, the recruits were explicitly told to only wear white or black shoes for a conditioning run, the officer said. Dorner, however, showed up in bright neon sneakers. "He thought he knew it all, that rules just kind of didn't apply to him," the officer said. "He was not a team player."
According to the officer, Dorner was kicked out of his academy class at least one time, when he accidentally shot himself in the hand. Internal disciplinary records show that Dorner was suspended for two days for an accidental discharge in 2005. He finished his training with another academy class, the officer said, and joined the force as an officer in February 2006, police records show.
Evans would later tell internal affairs investigators that Dorner confessed to her on the first day they worked together that he was unhappy with the way the LAPD handled a complaint he made against some of his classmates in the academy, according to police records. He believed the LAPD was a racist organization and told Evans he planned to sue the department at the end of his probation period, Evans reported.
Dorner repeatedly made mistakes in the field, Evans said. Shortly after becoming partners, they responded to a report of an armed man and Dorner stood in the middle of the street to confront the suspect without any cover, she said. Evans said she told Dorner that she was going to recommend that he be removed from the field unless he improved his performance, according to the internal affairs records.
The struggling officer's ultimate undoing began on the morning of July 28, when he and Evans were dispatched to a report of a man who had refused to leave a local hotel.
The officers found the mentally ill man seated on a bench. When he refused a command to stand up, Dorner took the man's wrist and pulled him up, records show. A struggle ensued and Evans had to grab Dorner's Taser stun gun from his belt to subdue the man
I can't speak to the hotel employees, but we do know that the patrol officer witness was at least mistaken with his interaction with Dorner (re: his tie), and of course Dorner's claims of off-the-record admission of guilt.Kamakazie Sith wrote:I didn't realize that Dorner's manifesto was considered truth. That might be true that two of the board members were friends of the accused and if so certainly does cast doubt on their decisions, however, according to one of the earlier articles Dorner's claim and that of the victim were found to be baseless because of three independent witnesses. At this point the LAPD should release that findings of this investigation to the media and if those witnesses are willing they should share their story with the media.
I'm not seeing anything particularly problematic there. The running shoes thing I suppose, but to tell the truth it's not really possible to find nice running shoes in anything but garish colors anymore. If you've read the manifesto, Dorner references the complaint. His side is that he stopped another recruit from singing/quoting/referencing Nazi songs about burning Jews in the ghetto to another recruit, Abraham Schefres. Exact quote is:General Mung Beans wrote:*snip*
Should be easy enough to verify, if anyone can get their hands on the actual complaint... He also mentions the disciplinary record of Evans, which again, should be easy to verify. Here's hoping that someone with real media credentials has a chance to examine his claims against the records and see how they stack up.Dorner manifesto wrote:During the BOR, the department attempted to label me unsuccessfully as a bully. They stated that I had bullied a recruit, Abraham Schefres, in the academy when in reality and unfounded disposition from the official 1.28 formal complaint investigation found that I was the one who stood up for Abraham Schefres when other recruits sang nazi hitler youth songs about burning Jewish ghettos in WWII Germany where his father was a survivor of a concentration camp.
Whatever interaction with the patrol officer witness you are speaking about isn't in the source I quoted. Could you cite it?GoldenBough wrote: I can't speak to the hotel employees, but we do know that the patrol officer witness was at least mistaken with his interaction with Dorner (re: his tie), and of course Dorner's claims of off-the-record admission of guilt.
Your shoe comment made me laugh. It is possible to find running shoes in black and white. It is actually very easy. Showing up in bright neon green shoes is just retarded in a paramilitary setting.GoldenBough wrote: I'm not seeing anything particularly problematic there. The running shoes thing I suppose, but to tell the truth it's not really possible to find nice running shoes in anything but garish colors anymore. If you've read the manifesto, Dorner references the complaint. His side is that he stopped another recruit from singing/quoting/referencing Nazi songs about burning Jews in the ghetto to another recruit, Abraham Schefres. Exact quote is:
I agree. The LAPD should be as transparent as possible.
Should be easy enough to verify, if anyone can get their hands on the actual complaint... He also mentions the disciplinary record of Evans, which again, should be easy to verify. Here's hoping that someone with real media credentials has a chance to examine his claims against the records and see how they stack up.
A judge ruled the last seven or so strikes excessive. This means you would need to prove that he was aware those last strikes were excessive and failed to act. That's why the now Captain wasn't charged with being an accomplice to excessive force.[edit] Oh, and something I wanted to bring up from a few pages ago, regarding the officer present at the Rodney King incident who is now Captain. I don't give a flying fuck if he did or did not swing a baton. If you've taken an oath to the public, and stand by and watch your fellow officers beat the shit out of a man, then you are a cowardly sack of shit and should have a brand on your cheek proclaiming you as such. "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" is never more relevant than when it applies to our law enforcement or military. Once you swear that oath, you are held to a higher standard. End of story.
Sure, from the Dorner manifesto:Kamakazie Sith wrote:Whatever interaction with the patrol officer witness you are speaking about isn't in the source I quoted. Could you cite it?
A link (earlier in the thread I think, or I may have saw it on Reddit) amounted to the same thing. Footage shows that Dorner was in a uniform without a tie that day, and the officer is on record during the disposition or similar with that statement.He also stated
that he assisted in cuffing the suspect and that’s old the BOR he told me to
fix my tie.
Ah, NB, fantastic, quite literally the only brand you can reference that supports your point (and I'm a runner, and like plain light grey shoes with minimal trim). I prefer Asics myself, but they're a quality shoe. I see the 2040 (I wear cushioning) is grey, and would likely pass muster. Don't know if I'd drop $275 for a training run if I already had perfectly functional shoes already, but it certainly is a against-the-rules situation. That guy must certainly have been a handful at training, with his bright shoes and all.Your shoe comment made me laugh. It is possible to find running shoes in black and white. It is actually very easy. Showing up in bright neon green shoes is just retarded in a paramilitary setting.
http://www.newbalance.com/men/shoes/run ... lt,sc.html
That's an awfully weak defense, and absolutely worthless in my mind. We're going to have to simply disagree here. I feel very strongly about what the role of police officers is, and beating civilians isn't something that should be in the job description.A judge ruled the last seven or so strikes excessive. This means you would need to prove that he was aware those last strikes were excessive and failed to act. That's why the now Captain wasn't charged with being an accomplice to excessive force.
The audio is embedded on that page.Audio: Police appear to give orders to burn down cabin with Christopher Dorner believed to be inside
Read more: http://www.sbsun.com/breakingnews/ci_22 ... z2KkzPLqr3