Re: Rogue One: A Star Wars Story
Posted: 2016-04-10 09:54pm
Given the nature of the story, if I were to take guessed I'd say he's ISB.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
It was briefly captured by Zann while under construction at Kuat but never actually moved.Galvatron wrote: Besides, the Eclipse was apparently stolen four year after the Battle of Yavin, then abandoned, then recovered by the reborn Emperor's forces. Even if Thrawn knew about it, it may not have been available to him during his campaign anyway.
Disney buys the IP of real artists; they don't hire them to make movies.Sea Skimmer wrote:Seems like a real hackjob were going to get. Super implausible character, who has to be another English sounding white women of course for reasons, with the worst possible horrible traits for being a secret agent/spy/covert anything, and a bunch of really dumb looking fighting. I was hoping these side story movies would be where some more exoticism came back into the franchise but looks like nope. Certainly I don't see a trace. Frankly the moment I saw the moron with the staff I just gave up hope, I'll have to settle for being happy if it isn't a literal Force Awakens 2.0.
It's also written by Gary Whitta, who wrote After Earth, the movie that left John Travolta feeling great relief since thanks to Whitta, Battlefield Earth is now only the second worst Scientology film ever made.The fact that this is from the director for Godzilla, which could put most of its problems squarely on poor direction and a failure to give the audience what it rationally wanted is also filtering my expectations and opinions.
George made a horrible mistake in appointing Kathleen Kennedy to be the head of Lucasfilm. That's what happens when you don't have a storyteller in charge of Star Wars.Elfdart wrote:
Disney buys the IP of real artists; they don't hire them to make movies.
Well, Marvel, which is Disney-owned, got Joss Whedon to make two Avengers films and work on Agents of SHIELD. I don't know that I'd call Whedon an artist, but he has talent, and his own distinctive style, as opposed to being merely a hack.Elfdart wrote:Disney buys the IP of real artists; they don't hire them to make movies.
I doubt Kennedy had a whole lot of say in the matter, since Bob Iger is the one who is really in charge. Lucas hired Kennedy and Arndt (giving him a story outline) and persuaded Ford, Fisher and Hamill to sign up before he sold to Disney. Iger promptly shit-canned Arndt (plus George's story), brought in one of the biggest hacks to direct, and demanded the movie be ready for Christmas 2015, even though the star was unable to work thanks to being seriously injured by one of those "REEEEEEAL SETS!" internet fatties like to gush over. Well, that's a perfect storm for derivative, unoriginal film-making and guess what -that's exactly what Disney served up.ray245 wrote:George made a horrible mistake in appointing Kathleen Kennedy to be the head of Lucasfilm. That's what happens when you don't have a storyteller in charge of Star Wars.Elfdart wrote:
Disney buys the IP of real artists; they don't hire them to make movies.
My issue with Joss is he's a TV series director, and the Avengers films really show his limitations, especially in regards to cinematography.The Romulan Republic wrote:Well, Marvel, which is Disney-owned, got Joss Whedon to make two Avengers films and work on Agents of SHIELD. I don't know that I'd call Whedon an artist, but he has talent, and his own distinctive style, as opposed to being merely a hack.Elfdart wrote:Disney buys the IP of real artists; they don't hire them to make movies.
Kennedy was the one pushing for Abrams, even after he said no. Disney as a parent company tends to give their subsidiaries a lot of creative freedom. I think she made some good decision in hiring some interesting directors like Rian Johnson and Gareth Edwards. However, the people she hired to write the stories and the script tends to be a bigger issue.I doubt Kennedy had a whole lot of say in the matter, since Bob Iger is the one who is really in charge. Lucas hired Kennedy and Arndt (giving him a story outline) and persuaded Ford, Fisher and Hamill to sign up before he sold to Disney. Iger promptly shit-canned Arndt (plus George's story), brought in one of the biggest hacks to direct, and demanded the movie be ready for Christmas 2015, even though the star was unable to work thanks to being seriously injured by one of those "REEEEEEAL SETS!" internet fatties like to gush over. Well, that's a perfect storm for derivative, unoriginal film-making and guess what -that's exactly what Disney served up.
Gary Whitta departed the project last January, he was replaced by Chris Weitz.Elfdart wrote: It's also written by Gary Whitta, who wrote After Earth, the movie that left John Travolta feeling great relief since thanks to Whitta, Battlefield Earth is now only the second worst Scientology film ever made.
Why would any sane producer even hire Gary Whitta in the first place?Vympel wrote:Gary Whitta departed the project last January, he was replaced by Chris Weitz.Elfdart wrote: It's also written by Gary Whitta, who wrote After Earth, the movie that left John Travolta feeling great relief since thanks to Whitta, Battlefield Earth is now only the second worst Scientology film ever made.
Presumably they liked his treatment, then changed their minds. It happens.ray245 wrote: Why would any sane producer even hire Gary Whitta in the first place?
Because of course we've never seen anyone use a staff or other mundane edged or blunt weapons in Star Wars before?Sea Skimmer wrote:Seems like a real hackjob were going to get. Super implausible character, who has to be another English sounding white women of course for reasons, with the worst possible horrible traits for being a secret agent/spy/covert anything, and a bunch of really dumb looking fighting. I was hoping these side story movies would be where some more exoticism came back into the franchise but looks like nope. Certainly I don't see a trace. Frankly the moment I saw the moron with the staff I just gave up hope, I'll have to settle for being happy if it isn't a literal Force Awakens 2.0.
Hmm.ray245 wrote:My issue with Joss is he's a TV series director, and the Avengers films really show his limitations, especially in regards to cinematography.
Unlike all the bad guys with guns, who were of course super effective in comparisonElfdart wrote:All of whom got their asses kicked, or turned out to be useless.
That's really no excuse considering the Russo brothers produced something more cinematic than Whedon. Anyone directing a film must understand visual storytelling is the most important thing, not just the dialogue.The Romulan Republic wrote:Hmm.ray245 wrote:My issue with Joss is he's a TV series director, and the Avengers films really show his limitations, especially in regards to cinematography.
He certainly has more directing experience in television, but I don't think he's a bad film director. Then again, Whedon was a writer first and a director second.
That said, I don't think Avengers is the best to show case his style, perhaps because he was working inside someone else's world and with certain limitations.
Serenity is a better example of what Whedon can do as a film director in my opinion, despite the fact that he was working on a much smaller budget.
The rank badge has me more curious than anything. It's the same one that Admirals Piett and Ozzel wore in TESB, but Admiral Motti and General Tagge had far smaller badges in ANH. Only Tarkin himself had a badge that size, although with slightly different colored squares.Chimaera wrote:Thrawn was a Chiss wasn't he? The guy in the trailer looks decidedly human. Maybe he'll be a 'Thrawn in all but name' type, unless they pull a Star Trek Into Darkness/Spectre and have him announce himself as Thrawn accompanied by BWUUUUUM music.
People can't get past the white tunic.Batman wrote:The guy in the trailer also didn't wear a Grand Admiral's uniform.
Oh man...now you've got my mind racing about casting Christoph Waltz in a Star Wars movie one dayThanas wrote:My guess is that the guy will be a version of a special troubleshooter cliche in the tradition of Inglourious Basterds' Hans Landa.
I think he's more likely to be someone we haven't heard of before, like the unidentified ISB Director, so they can create as much of his bio from scratch without shitting all over Isard's old EU version.Kal_Skirata wrote:I've been wondering if the man in white might be Armand Isard, who was recanonized in Tarkin.
I don't know if this is even still an issue, but this pretty much puts to rest the idea that the Empire switched over from one badge-rank system to another between ANH and ESB, doesn't it? The ISB Marshal in RO has the same rank scheme as Death Squadron, and would appear to be concurrent with the regional rank system used under Grand Moff Tarkin.
I don't think it means anything conclusive. Tarkin had a rank badge with just as many squares. I can easily imagine that the Director of the ISB would have had one similar to that of a Grand Moff, whether before ANH or not.applejack wrote:I don't know if this is even still an issue, but this pretty much puts to rest the idea that the Empire switched over from one badge-rank system to another between ANH and ESB, doesn't it? The ISB Marshal in RO has the same rank scheme as Death Squadron, and would appear to be concurrent with the regional rank system used under Grand Moff Tarkin.
EDIT: Oops... missed Necronlord's post just above... LOL! But, no really, is it still a contentious issue? Because I remember reading about it on Saxton's site and largely agreeing with his assessment.