Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
That's true; I've seen the picture progression laid out on some plastic surgery websites and it's obvious. I don't think it was necessary either, but for PT to say she's become "hideous" as a result is just the kind of asinine "I have ridiculously high standards" Internet geekboy talk that I've grown sick of.Vympel wrote:Nicole Kidman has had some pretty obvious plastic surgery.
It wasn't as asinine as Peregrin Toker, with whom I momentarily had him confused, but still, we have a guy saying that aging is an unacceptable explanation for why a woman might look less soft after the passage of 7 years. She's 34 years old; 7 years ago she was 27 years old. Real women do not look as soft at 34 as they did at 27! And if a real 27-year old woman is chunky and doesn't lose some of that weight during her early 30s, she's going to get fucking jowls. I've seen it enough times on enough women to know.BoredShirtless wrote:His critisism was fairly moderate. Not over the top, unlike you at the moment.Darth Wong wrote:Oh wow, so people in the most superficial business in the world said she lost weight, and this validates your claim that you're not being over-critical?
She was like 12 in BMX bandits (which I saw for sale in DVD format by the way), but has she really had plasitc surgery? I ask because her sisters look the same, and I find it odd that that would be the case (unless they all have the same plastic surgon of course).Vympel wrote:Nicole Kidman has had some pretty obvious plastic surgery. Compare her to how she looked in say, BMX Bandits (hahahahahahah!) to how she looks now. I think she looked her absolute best in Batman Forever. She still looks pretty now, but I prefer redheads.
Why's it called plastic surgery anyway?
Okay, it was probably an exaggeration to call her hideous, but I still think that the overuse of botox has made her facial expression look rather constipated (in the pics I posted, her cheeks looked abnormally swollen), and that her various plastic surgeries hurt more than they helped. Don't forget that chain smoking has made her hands incredibly red.Darth Wong wrote:That's true; I've seen the picture progression laid out on some plastic surgery websites and it's obvious. I don't think it was necessary either, but for PT to say she's become "hideous" as a result is just the kind of asinine "I have ridiculously high standards" Internet geekboy talk that I've grown sick of.Vympel wrote:Nicole Kidman has had some pretty obvious plastic surgery.
You're missing the point, what makes Amanda Tapping attractive is that she looks so ordinary (for a celebrity, that is).Stormbringer wrote:And Amanada Tapping? She's another forgettable generic blonde. I suppose she's wankable for the Gate-boys but she's nothing special.
Yeah... when you think about it, she's more unusual than beautiful really. (from some angles, she looks like she should be on the cover of a book about alien abductions) But I think she has aged very well.Uma Thurman, she's striking but I wouldn't call her beautiful.
She's hot no question about it. My point is that when talking about the most beautiful actresses she just isn't there. She's another generic attractive blonde actress, you can pretty much buy that sort at a prop store. "Hi, I'd like to get a generic blonde #42 please." They're a dime a dozen and I wouldn't consider her anything special as far as attractiveness goes relative to some actresses.You're missing the point, what makes Amanda Tapping attractive is that she looks so ordinary (for a celebrity, that is).
Yeah, thats rather my point.Yeah... when you think about it, she's more unusual than beautiful really. (from some angles, she looks like she should be on the cover of a book about alien abductions) But I think she has aged very well.
in arts plastic = 3DVympel wrote: Why's it called plastic surgery anyway?
Brooke?Queeb Salaron wrote:
As is Hulk Hogan's daughter Kelly (I think her name is Kelly). Hot stuff, man.
Is she an actress to begin with? I'm not sure about that, really...xBlackFlash wrote:Brooke?Queeb Salaron wrote:
As is Hulk Hogan's daughter Kelly (I think her name is Kelly). Hot stuff, man.
She was hotter before she got the way-too-young-for-plastic-surgery plastic surgery.Queeb Salaron wrote:As is Hulk Hogan's daughter Kelly (I think her name is Kelly). Hot stuff, man.
Pics@!Stormbringer wrote:Mira Furlan- no I'm not talking about B5. I've actually watched several of her foriegn films and she can be both smoking hot and incredibly elegant.
I always figured it was because they used plastic-y (plasticicy...plasticey...having the characteristic of plasticisticy) materials in the surgery. Guess I was wrong.in arts plastic = 3D
Well, at least this time you and Peregrin Toker ain't flaming each other concerning the size of women's breast.Darth Wong wrote: It wasn't as asinine as Peregrin Toker, with whom I momentarily had him confused, but still, we have a guy saying that aging is an unacceptable explanation for why a woman might look less soft after the passage of 7 years. She's 34 years old; 7 years ago she was 27 years old. Real women do not look as soft at 34 as they did at 27! And if a real 27-year old woman is chunky and doesn't lose some of that weight during her early 30s, she's going to get fucking jowls. I've seen it enough times on enough women to know.
Hmm........ perhaps I should resurrect some of my.. specialised SB threads here.Grand Moff Yenchin wrote:
Noriko Fujiwara
). Though hot chicks are generally more athletic now, they did have something back then... class I suppose.NoZerg Goddess wrote:Pics@!Stormbringer wrote:Mira Furlan- no I'm not talking about B5. I've actually watched several of her foriegn films and she can be both smoking hot and incredibly elegant.
Every time I see a picture of her, the music from the Stern show pops into my head:Z-Ha-Dum wrote:Ms. Bellucci is one sultry goddess
