Page 7 of 7

Posted: 2006-07-01 09:33am
by Darth Wong
Does she expect people to be impressed by her constant self-declarations of being a "journo"? FOXNews has "journos" too, and in fact, for a "journo" to cover a particular field (such as becoming a defense correspondent or science correspondent) hardly means or even vaguely implies any particular knowledge of that field, as countless butchered science journalism articles have demonstrated.

Posted: 2006-07-01 06:58pm
by Connor MacLeod
Darth Wong wrote:Does she expect people to be impressed by her constant self-declarations of being a "journo"? FOXNews has "journos" too, and in fact, for a "journo" to cover a particular field (such as becoming a defense correspondent or science correspondent) hardly means or even vaguely implies any particular knowledge of that field, as countless butchered science journalism articles have demonstrated.
If you consider the sort of people she's dealing with (aside from her syncophants that is.) then that makes perfect sense. I suppose its sort of an "appeal to authority" mentality, like "I'm an important person, I'm used to dealing with facts, you can believe me when I say I'm right because I say so." When you couple this fact with her rather aggressive "information suppression" tactics (especially of recurring criticism and of past events, particularily through her flunkies) her tactics are rather obvious.

She's basically making sure her propoganda gets out where people can see it, while using others (IE Dark Moose) to suppress dissenting or opposing viewpoints on the grounds of "harassment."

In this context, to these people, the substance of the arguments matter little compared to all the rhetoric and emotional appeals she makes. That, plus her aggressiveness in pursuing critics and the intimidation factor (both with her and others) means she basically gets awy with it.

Posted: 2006-07-01 08:07pm
by Elfdart
Darth Wong wrote:Does she expect people to be impressed by her constant self-declarations of being a "journo"? FOXNews has "journos" too, and in fact, for a "journo" to cover a particular field (such as becoming a defense correspondent or science correspondent) hardly means or even vaguely implies any particular knowledge of that field, as countless butchered science journalism articles have demonstrated.
Being a journalist is like being a singer, a psychic, or a poet: You can be one just by claiming to be one. It's not like being a doctor, lawyer or engineer where you have to meet certain standards. A "journo" is someone who is too much of a phony to be a journalist. That kind of sums up Traviss to a tee.

Posted: 2006-07-02 03:24am
by Lord Poe
Looks like the "PLB" completely disbanded. Now that's pussification.

Posted: 2006-07-02 03:41am
by Lord Poe
+http://blogs.starwars.com/airyoda/88/comments
KT Jelly wrote:Karen Traviss
"Cannon to right of them, cannon to left of them...noble Three Million!"
date Posted: Jun 28, 2006 8:21 AM

Moose and I know you weren't involved, A.Y. Don't worry.

Sadly, I'm told that your PLB blog has already had a visit from the gentleman who made the hate video about me (the one that was banned by Youtube for offensive content) , and who has a long record of abuse against both me and Moose. He tracks me (and I believe Moose too) around the internet by Googe alert, posting abusive material, and now he's found you all at PLB. Consider it a heads up...I'm sure you'll get more visits from his friends too to try to recruit you to the cause.

And by the way - nobody is remotely interested in the "elitist" thing. It's completely irrelevant.
Hypocritical cunt. The video is still up, BTW, dumbass.

Posted: 2006-07-02 03:52am
by Mange
LOL! The question is who tracks who.

Posted: 2006-07-02 06:35am
by VT-16
Yeah, I can attest to that statement really being the exact opposite of what is happening. :lol:

Posted: 2006-07-02 08:22am
by Mange
I'm starting to become increasingly tired of the "OHHH they're abusive" whining. I'm certain that I'll be banned from the OS.

Posted: 2006-07-02 11:12am
by Jim Raynor
Karen Traviss wrote:Consider it a heads up...I'm sure you'll get more visits from his friends too to try to recruit you to the cause.
LMAO! Like we would even want those dickless pansies on our side. :roll:
Mange wrote:LOL! The question is who tracks who.
Exactly. I've considered posting about this whole debacle at some other forums that I go to, but I haven't because I just know that KT Jelly would come over with Dark Moose in tow. I mean, she fucking posts on Amazon.com where people briefly comment about her books, and no-name forums with 5 active members like Bryan Lambert's. :roll: The mere mention of her name is enough to bring her into a forum, and I like those other places that I mentioned too much to see them dragged into this shit.

Posted: 2006-07-02 11:19am
by Ender
Odd she hasn't rolled in here yet then.

Posted: 2006-07-02 11:21am
by Jim Raynor
Ender wrote:Odd she hasn't rolled in here yet then.
She hasn't got the guts. This is the one SW forum on the Internet where the majority doesn't give a shit if she's a "VIP" and won't tolerate her bullshit.

Posted: 2006-07-02 12:19pm
by VT-16
Like we would even want those dickless pansies on our side.
Yeah, rather have people who can back up their arguments and not get starstruck than people who fold at the first sign of dissent from a "celebrity".

Posted: 2006-07-02 12:19pm
by Master of Ossus
Ender wrote:Odd she hasn't rolled in here yet then.
She knows that the standards of debate she favors (the ones in which Dark Douche outlaws requests for evidence) are not tolerated here, and that we wouldn't stand for her bullshit "journo" and "abuse" lines.

Posted: 2006-07-03 01:57am
by Elfdart
Crown wrote:I'm so disgusted with this whole affair that I'm with Elfdart on this;
Like that's a burden. :roll: I AM Elfdart! :P
she's like the biblical flood washing the entire, shitty, craptacular EU down the drain.
I hope so. I've got my fingers crossed that the upcoming TV show will do just that. The prequels certainly flushed a lot of EU nonsense.
I can't wait for George to start slapping 'Infinities' logos on everything that he sees.


He might. He didn't hesitate to throw a bunch of the Marvel storylines under the bus, as well as the Holiday Special.

Posted: 2006-07-03 02:15am
by CaptainChewbacca
It seems to me Traviss is the internet BBS equivalent of "Bloody Mary". Say her name and she appears to spew bile and resentment upon the unwary.

Posted: 2006-07-03 05:12am
by loomer
Ender wrote:Odd she hasn't rolled in here yet then.
Would you really roll into a forum full of angry Star Wars fans who actually use scientific principles to debate SWvsST, won't accept what you write because it goes against all common sense, and can't be whipped back by the mod you're paying?

Posted: 2006-07-03 05:38am
by Jim Raynor
loomer wrote:and can't be whipped back by the mod you're paying?
It would actually be to DM's credit (relatively) if he was doing all this shit for money. As it is, all appearances indicate that he's just a pathetic asskissing, starstruck dork.

Posted: 2006-07-03 06:47am
by Crown
Jim Raynor wrote:
loomer wrote:and can't be whipped back by the mod you're paying?
It would actually be to DM's credit (relatively) if he was doing all this shit for money. As it is, all appearances indicate that he's just a pathetic asskissing, starstruck dork.
That's just ... a great smackdown sir. 8)

Posted: 2006-07-04 12:30am
by Connor MacLeod
Master of Ossus wrote:
Ender wrote:Odd she hasn't rolled in here yet then.
She knows that the standards of debate she favors (the ones in which Dark Douche outlaws requests for evidence) are not tolerated here, and that we wouldn't stand for her bullshit "journo" and "abuse" lines.
She won't come here becuase she doesn't need to. All she's needed to do is suppress her critics on other venues (IE TFN) while simultaneously peddling her own propoganda. That hardly needs stepping into a forum where she would be expected (God forbid) to actually discuss the issue.

She was evidently smart enough to have learned from her "mistakes" in attempting to debate the issue the last time.

Posted: 2006-07-06 08:05am
by Crown
Ender wrote:Odd she hasn't rolled in here yet then.
She probably read the Announcement forums and realised that she would get banned for not adhering to PR1 (she'd try and use Mando'a), PR3 (we were told not to put hard numbers in, actually were weren't, were, were't), DR2 (she's already inviolation of that), DR4, DR5, DR6, DR7, AR1 and probably AR4.

HOLLY FUCKING SHIT! She's a fucking troll by our standards, from her online behaivour. I did not realise that prior to starting to respond in this tread! :shock:

Posted: 2006-07-06 11:51am
by Arrow
Crown wrote:She probably read the Announcement forums and realised that she would get banned for not adhering to PR1 (she'd try and use Mando'a), PR3 (we were told not to put hard numbers in, actually were weren't, were, were't), DR2 (she's already inviolation of that), DR4, DR5, DR6, DR7, AR1 and probably AR4.

HOLLY FUCKING SHIT! She's a fucking troll by our standards, from her online behaivour. I did not realise that prior to starting to respond in this tread! :shock:
Hell, she'd be banned before she even made her first post! I'd love to see that parting shots entry.

Posted: 2006-07-06 01:33pm
by Edi
Arrow wrote:
Crown wrote:She probably read the Announcement forums and realised that she would get banned for not adhering to PR1 (she'd try and use Mando'a), PR3 (we were told not to put hard numbers in, actually were weren't, were, were't), DR2 (she's already inviolation of that), DR4, DR5, DR6, DR7, AR1 and probably AR4.

HOLLY FUCKING SHIT! She's a fucking troll by our standards, from her online behaivour. I did not realise that prior to starting to respond in this tread! :shock:
Hell, she'd be banned before she even made her first post! I'd love to see that parting shots entry.
I think she'd be invited to argue her position and then used for a chewtoy. Might even happen without much flaming initially, but since she'll only play with a deck stacked in her favor, as it were, the whole point is moot.

Edi

Posted: 2006-07-13 01:57am
by Lord Poe
BTW, those (very) few PLBers who decided not to take a money shot from Dark Moose so they can stay in Traviss' good graces have moved on to new digs. ALREADY, someone they've identified as a sw.com mod was there threatening them, and trolling. Something interesting; my comments have been left untouched, but a comment after mine was deleted. Interesting the way the worm turns.

BTW, the troll's name was "ThinBlueLine". Those of you that have waded into the sw.com cesspool know that mods are identified by their names appearing in blue.
We Won...
I don't know if any of you saw our conversation, but TBL and I had a nice friendly chat back at his blog. I decided that enough was enough. I'm not saying I "showed him", but yesterday, I checked on his blog at bluevanguard.blogspot.com. Nothing. Error 404, cannot find requested blog. As you've undoubtedly noticed today, his comments no longer plague our existence. He backed down.

TBL, a troll and a coward. It'd be a shame if he were a sw.com MOD, but then again, I wouldn't be surprised if he were. He was constantly talking to me about how "tolerant" the MODs are being with the PLB, and how they've stored the deleted comments from the little tooth-and-claw fight back there a while ago. However, another possibility is that he's just a bitter, anti-PLB troll who likes to scare us out of our pants.

Either way, he backed down, and I'm pouring another round of PGGBs for three reasons: 1), in celebration, 2), just because, and 3), it's my birthday.

Drink to your heart's content, or until your brain has had enough abuse for today...