Rogue 9 wrote: 2018-03-03 12:26am
The Romulan Republic wrote: 2018-03-02 06:52pm
I do not for the life of me understand why fans would condemn Holdo for not telling Poe every detail of her battle plan (well, other than mindless bashing of every aspect of the film, or blatant sexism).
Poe is a squadron commander. He has no right to demand the details of an Admiral's battle plans. He may have been Leia's favorite, but he had also just been demoted by Leia herself (who Holdo clearly has a great deal of respect and affection for) for insubordination and incompetence that got their entire bomber force and a significant portion of their fighters wiped out. Holdo doesn't know Poe. The very first thing he does is start insubordinately challenging her authority and questioning her orders on the bridge in front of her crew.
Even leaving the possibility of spies aside, why in God's name would she tell him anything he doesn't absolutely need to know? If she made a mistake, it was not throwing his ass in the brig right then.
As the video points out, she didn't just not tell Poe; she didn't tell
anyone. Senior command staff participated in the mutiny. Poe wasn't special; she literally let the entire ship believe there was no way out and she wasn't even trying to create one.
Do we actually
see any of her interactions with other officers? Not really. Its also telling, I think, that while most of the crew don't appear to openly take Holdo's side, its also only a few who are shown actively working with Poe in the mutiny. If the entire crew had thought Poe right, Holdo could never have retaken the ship. And, again, when anyone on board could have been a spy...
Plus, you know, Poe was actually
aware of the transports being loaded when he launched the mutiny, as were his collaborators. IIRC it was
why he launched the mutiny. So not only did telling Poe something not
help Holdo, it made things
worse.
Also... she's a supposedly famous and well-respected admiral, she's clearly not giving up, so why would her entire crew
assume that she has no plan and is actually just waiting to die, just because she does not divulge said plan to them? No, the issue is not that there was no plan. Its that Poe didn't personally agree with her plan. Which is in no way his call to make.
CetaMan wrote: 2018-03-03 01:08am
She obviously told some staff to fill the transports, but failing to tell the command staff (probably because they weren't her command staff) was asking for trouble in a resistance group, where trust forms a large basis of ability especially after the loss of literally the rest of the command structure.
I am skeptical that she could have begun fueling and loading all those transports without the command staff being aware of it. To my knowledge, we never actually see on-screen confirmation that she never told any other members of the command staff (if this is incorrect, source/quote please). Also, remember that
Poe was also aware of the transports being loaded when he launched his mutiny. It wasn't that they thought that there was no plan- they just didn't agree with the plan. Which, unless the plan is illegal or involves war crimes, isn't really their call to make as Holdo's subordinates.
When people are deserting enough that Rose is stationed at the escape pods to prevent it, you have a morale problem that needs better attention than, 'Im in charge now, have hope'. And keeping her bridge crew thinking that they need to mutiny against her to survive proves that she wasn't delivering on leadership. Something utterly necessary in a voluntary militia like the Resistance.[/quote]
Again, every military in history has had desertions, often in much less dire straights. A handful of people out of a fleet of hundreds doesn't immediately scream to me "mutiny imminent".
I'll also note, again, that it was a fairly small number who appeared to actively mutiny, and I doubt they would have done so without Poe's instigation. So I reiterate: If Holdo made one major error, it was not tossing Poe in the brig sooner.
In addition, all of the film takes place over the course of a single battle, during which Holdo was trying to take command of fleet that had just lost most of its command staff, and organize an evacuation. Maybe she was, you know, busy with keeping the fleet alive?
Civil War Man wrote: 2018-03-03 09:21amWhen you have a large number of desertions in a short amount of time (somewhere around half a dozen in the span of at most a few hours, and that's just counting the ones who tried to use that one escape pod), then as a commander you need to do
something to get the troops back in line, or you are either going to watch the entire command structure implode or find yourself staring down the business end of a mutiny.
Perhaps, but see above.
Look at it from Holdo's point of view: she is trying to take command of a decapitated leadership, fight a battle in which she is grossly-outgunned, and organize a retreat at the same time. That would tax the abilities of any commander in history. So I'm not going to say she's incompetent, or even more ludicrously, a probable traitor, because she didn't find the time to reassure a few malcontents.
Sometimes that something involves punishing insubordination,
I reiterate: If she made one big mistake, it was not chucking Poe in the brig sooner.
sometimes it involves doing something to inspire them,
Which she attempted to do with her speech.
But apparently it doesn't count because she didn't take the time to reassure every individual officer, even if guilty of insubordination, in the middle of a crucial battle. Or because she didn't divulge details of her battle plans to the entire crew when she had every reason to suspect a highly-placed spy on board.
It does remind me of the Rey situation, again: much as even abilities that would normally be taken for granted suddenly require an elaborate explanation when Rey possesses them, the idea that soldiers should obey an experienced and respected commander suddenly requires elaborate justification when its Holdo.
I'm not saying its all gender bias in all cases, though I do think that's part of it, for some people. But I think that too many people jump on the band wagon, probably because the argument dovetails with their personal dislike of the character/film, so they don't bother to engage their critical thinking much.
and sometimes just giving them something to keep them busy is enough. Keeping the crew active can go a long way in maintaining their trust. Giving them nothing to do in that situation just reinforces the perception that you have no plan. The fact that Finn, Poe, Rose, and the other crew members who joined the mutiny were apparently just left to their own devices, to the point where they could cook up a plan with zero interference and Finn and Rose could just leave without anyone ever noticing they were gone, was asking for trouble.
I'd have thought that most of the crew would have been busy carrying out the evacuations (or else manning their usual stations). We certainly see nothing to contradict that assumption on-screen, to the best of my recollection. Rose was doing something productive (weather with orders or on her own initiative), and Finn had just awoken from a coma and had no formal Resistance rank or duties.
Poe was inactive because he had been previously relieved of duty, and then his squadron blown-up. And again,
Holdo owes Poe nothing.
Moreover, I repeat, there is no indication that the mutiny was a popular uprising. It was a botched coup attempt by a handful of crew, rallied by a single insubordinate malcontent who arguably should have been brigged a third of the way into the film.
Gandalf wrote: 2018-03-03 08:27am Under normal circumstances, the security staff would probably thank her for her initiative, then post some guards at the escape pods so she can go back to doing her actual job. That this did not happen gave me the impression that security was already stretched close to the breaking point, so they couldn't spare anyone, and/or everyone was so demoralized that few people were even bothering trying to hand out orders anymore.
More likely the former. If the fleet in general was that demoralized, they wouldn't even have been able to organize the evacuation of the transports.
CaoCao wrote: 2018-03-03 10:45amYou're the last person that could say that.
Oh yeah, play the victim.
You're the one who started off by insulting anyone who disagrees with you here. And you'll note I'm not throwing these accusations or insults at anyone but you.
No, Holdo hadn't been in command too long when that happened.
Why? Because you arbitrarily say so? The bit with Rose happened more or less
right after Holdo takes command in the film.
It's a clear a sign that there is a problem to be addressed. They are all volunteers that, up to that point, had been on unsanctioned activity (by their government, the New Republic), not drafted civilians or half hearted career military.
It shows that the FO managed to scare them, and they needed some form of reassurance.
No doubt, but I question weather Holdo was in a position to be aware of the full extent of the problem, or to address it more than she did, given the circumstances. Or, for that matter, that more than a small minority of the crew were feeling mutinous.
Nor do I feel that any of that justifies a mutiny.
He got the dreadnought and was demoted for insubordination, not incompetence.
It is very clear that Leia's objection was to both the insubordination and the loss of an entire bomber squadron (the only one they had, to boot).
He asked for a plan more than once. And yes, she had every reason to tell him.
No. No she didn't.
Do you really believe that an admiral is obligated to give their battle plans to an insubordinate captain who's just been demoted, in a situation where they have every reason to believe there is a spy, after he has just publicly questioned their authority in the middle of a crisis? Of course not. No remotely informed and intelligent person would think that, if they put any thought into the matter.
I really do not know what to attribute this to if not gender bias: that if a mere woman is in command, she must justify her competence and authority to an extent that would never be asked otherwise.
Whatever else anyone thinks of the film, Holdo, Poe, or my arguments, can we put this bit of idiocy to rest right now, and all agree that Holdo had no obligation to tell Poe a damn thing?
You mean the others that mutinied with him? Because even the bridge crew was in on the mutiny.
I only saw a handful of people on-screen actively involved in the mutiny. Holdo could never have retaken the ship if the entire crew was actively against her.
You want to portray this as a popular uprising against Holdo, you justify it.
Poe is still the wing commander (even when there's no longer a fighter wing), he is ex-New Republic officer and he is chosen by Leia as his successor. But if you want to nitpick, there is no scene where they straight tell the hierarchy.
Demanding you back up your claims when they have a direct bearing on the subject being debated is not a "nitpick", jackass.
Poe's a captain who just got disciplined for violating orders and getting a bunch of people killed, and follows it up with more insubordination in a crisis.
Holdo owes him nothing but a trip to the brig.
You're using hindsight here. The rest of the crew didn't know there was a plan,
Prove it.
Prove that she told no one. Prove that they were all ignorant, even as they were loading the transports. Prove that it would have made a damn bit of difference if she had told them all sooner, given that Poe mutinied
after he knew the transports were being loaded. In fact, IIRC,
because he knew the transports were being loaded.
And in any case, my point stands that the plan would have in all probability worked fine, without Poe's interference plus bad luck. Which is certainly a point against Holdo being incompetent.
the "stealth" ships (they are actually not stealth, only some technobabble about engine baffling or something) nor a nearby planet. If you want to use Holdo's plan, then you need her to, at least, tell her crew there is one. Which she didn't.
Prove it. And prove that it would have made a damn bit of difference if she had, given that Poe mutinied
after he knew about the transports.
But since you are saying stealth isn't actually stealth, and actually
denying that there is a nearby planet when the entire last act of the film takes place there, I don't think we can attach much weight to anything that you say.
So much for keeping it civil.
I merely repaid you in kind.
No, it's not a fucking gender cliche, were she a man, I would also call him Pinky. Hell, I even recall Yoda being call Greenie. Her unfitness to her position is not based on gender. Hux is unfit for his position as well, even moreso than Holdo.
Nice of you to acknowledge that, but calling a female leader "Pinky" (evoking her appearance and gender clichés) to belittle her is absolutely sexist. If you did not intend it as such, that merely shows that you were being an ignorant idiot, rather than malicious.
Back on the discussion, it's not just Poe that mutinies, only her assistant is on her side. She never tries to talk it out, just shuts her mouth and lets everything play out.
Most of the crew, to all appearances, took no part, but just sat it out or got on with their jobs. If only Holdo's assistant was on her side against the entire rest of the crew, she'd never have taken the ship back.
Also, just ignore that
Leia was on her side.
DJ knew about the plan because she never tried to get anyone to trust her in the first place. If she said there was a plan, then the communication where DJ overhears the shuttle business would not have happened. For Poe and the rest of the crew, she was leading them to the slaughter (and there was ample evidence of that).
There was no solid evidence of that other than the assumption that she is unfit.
The entire point of the subplot was for the audience to believe she was a traitor that hated Poe, so it could be subverted to show she was one of the good guys and actually liked him. And be a device for Poe's character growth, by learning to stick to the hierarchy
Not "learning to stick to the hierarchy". Learning not to take knee-jerk risks unilaterally.
And while I expected her to be either incompetent or a traitor until the reveal, it was more because I'm used to that cliché being flogged in Hollywood, than because it actually made sense. No doubt the audience was intended to believe that, but not because it makes sense based on Holdo's actions. Rather, because the film was showing us things from Poe's perspective (a protagonist we had already gotten to know and sympathize with), and because it was playing to genre expectations.
(which I'm not really sure is that good of a message, but oh well).
Yeah, you should always rebel, even when there is a good reason not to! Ron Paul 2020!