Posted: 2002-10-21 10:20am
Young ebnough??? I can't wait until I'm OLD enough!!!
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Heh. People who actively believe in ghosts don't last two seconds at something like that. The last episode I saw was on the USS Hornet. Man, I would have liked that. Even late at night and bouncing around with a camera strapped to my body.verilon wrote:Young enough??? I can't wait until I'm OLD enough!!!
You insist on stating your superstitions as fact. On this board, that is the equivalent of putting a big red bulls-eye on your back. You should know that.verilon wrote:Two things while I am digging up this thread:
First, to Lag: I did not offer a challenge to Durandal...he challenged my views. Let's let it rest at that, no more discussion on the topic, please...I've had enough defending myself. (I could still do, it, I'm just sick and tired of it)
Maybe females are not taught to value objectivity as much as males are. This would dovetail with the well-known cultural aversion to females excelling in math and science (even when a woman has the talent, she may choose not to because society pressures women not to be good in math and science).I was wondering as well if there is some sort of thing going on here...a lot of females I know are clairvoyant, or seers of some sort. Also, there is a large portion of gay people that happen to have these abilities as well. I wanted to know if anybody thought there might be a connection here? I mean, I don't know *any* straight guys that have this talent...
If you would admit that your beliefs are based on faith and have no objective or rational basis, I don't think anybody would object. But when you state superstition as fact and tell Lagmonster that he's "bullshitting" himself for not seeing what you say he saw, you're basically asking for it, are you not?My opinions, my thoughts. Answer if you will, but please don't bash on me.
Gotta agree with Wong, your starting to be rather forcive with your beliefs. You believe in ghosts and clarivoyence well and good, you argue it as a faith system good for you, but to argue it as a factual, rational system... then you start to be an arse. Accept that what you believe is exactly that, your beliefs, and don't try to prove people wrong using a psuedo science. There is another type of person that does what your starting to do verilon, that person is a fundie christian... just lay off trying to prove your beliefs as fact.Darth Wong wrote:You insist on stating your superstitions as fact. On this board, that is the equivalent of putting a big red bulls-eye on your back. You should know that.verilon wrote:Two things while I am digging up this thread:
First, to Lag: I did not offer a challenge to Durandal...he challenged my views. Let's let it rest at that, no more discussion on the topic, please...I've had enough defending myself. (I could still do, it, I'm just sick and tired of it)Maybe females are not taught to value objectivity as much as males are. This would dovetail with the well-known cultural aversion to females excelling in math and science (even when a woman has the talent, she may choose not to because society pressures women not to be good in math and science).I was wondering as well if there is some sort of thing going on here...a lot of females I know are clairvoyant, or seers of some sort. Also, there is a large portion of gay people that happen to have these abilities as well. I wanted to know if anybody thought there might be a connection here? I mean, I don't know *any* straight guys that have this talent...If you would admit that your beliefs are based on faith and have no objective or rational basis, I don't think anybody would object. But when you state superstition as fact and tell Lagmonster that he's "bullshitting" himself for not seeing what you say he saw, you're basically asking for it, are you not?My opinions, my thoughts. Answer if you will, but please don't bash on me.
You know what? I only need one person to make this point. I failed to see that WHEN I POSTED, and therefore had to keep going with it....all you guys are doing is reiterating what Wong already stated.Lagmonster wrote:I don't personally have a problem with verilon telling me that I'm kidding myself and I'm actually seeing ghosts instead of just hearing the normal clacks and clanks of the universe coupled with some funky electrical or electromagnetic phenomena. There's been a large mass of pro-supernaturalists I've had to interact with as a consequence of my interest in folklore, and they're usually at least as insistant that you believe what they believe. I have often supposed that since religionists and supernaturalists have no observable support for their beliefs, that they aggressively seek the agreement of other people as personal justification.
At any rate, verilon, Lord Wong is right; hereabouts being reminded that you're being irrational is your warning to bow out of the argument graciously; people here do not make such an offer twice.
LOL!!! I've seen that fer real...Kelly Antilles wrote:Just like all goths are gay/bi/lesbians... granted that's MOSTLY true.
To quote a friend:EmperorMing wrote:LOL!!! I've seen that fer real...Kelly Antilles wrote:Just like all goths are gay/bi/lesbians... granted that's MOSTLY true.
Exactly.weemadando wrote:To quote a friend:EmperorMing wrote:LOL!!! I've seen that fer real...Kelly Antilles wrote:Just like all goths are gay/bi/lesbians... granted that's MOSTLY true.
"My girlfriend asks me why I go to the Coven [monthly goth industrial underground rave] . . . scantily clad lesbians getting it on on the dance floor."
weemadando wrote:Ummm... What kind of fetishists are we talking here?