Posted: 2005-02-03 07:11pm
That looks like the http header's been screwed up
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
How much did this set you back financially?Darth Wong wrote:BTW, the power supply failed in the server last night, so I replaced it this morning and we're back up and running. Actually, I replaced the whole case with a new roomier ANTEC "Sonata" case. Quite a nice case; I'm very pleased with it. The people who made the old case with its crappy power supply, on the other hand, can suck my balls.
$150. Not a really big deal in the grand scheme of things.Stofsk wrote:How much did this set you back financially?Darth Wong wrote:BTW, the power supply failed in the server last night, so I replaced it this morning and we're back up and running. Actually, I replaced the whole case with a new roomier ANTEC "Sonata" case. Quite a nice case; I'm very pleased with it. The people who made the old case with its crappy power supply, on the other hand, can suck my balls.
As an aside, did you know that the daily backup file is over 500MB even with compression?Admiral Valdemar wrote:Huzzah for Mike then! I had wondered how SDN had gone offline before checking the main page. At least we lost no data, not that it's a problem with daily backups.
Yes, just the case (well, the power supply to be precise, but it was easier to replace the whole case than to replace the custom power supply, and this time I got a really nice case/PS). But the case is, of course, the hardest part to replace because you have to completely tear everything apart and then put it all back together again.Crown wrote:I must admit you got fixed pretty quickly. Your message mentioned things about 'parts' and I was thinking like motherboards, networkcards, etc. So it was just the case then?
What the HECK is your drive made out of? 1TB?!Darth Wong wrote:As an aside, did you know that the daily backup file is over 500MB even with compression?Admiral Valdemar wrote:Huzzah for Mike then! I had wondered how SDN had gone offline before checking the main page. At least we lost no data, not that it's a problem with daily backups.
I was assuming we'd be down for most of the weekend. I checked one last time before I was going to log off and lo and behold.Crown wrote:I must admit you got fixed pretty quickly. Your message mentioned things about 'parts' and I was thinking like motherboards, networkcards, etc. So it was just the case then?
Same here. Good job, Lord Wong.Stravo wrote:I was assuming we'd be down for most of the weekend. I checked one last time before I was going to log off and lo and behold.Crown wrote:I must admit you got fixed pretty quickly. Your message mentioned things about 'parts' and I was thinking like motherboards, networkcards, etc. So it was just the case then?
He said 500 *Mega*bytes, not 500 *Giga*bytes.Ace Pace wrote:What the HECK is your drive made out of? 1TB?!
500MB every day.Crayz9000 wrote:He said 500 *Mega*bytes, not 500 *Giga*bytes.Ace Pace wrote:What the HECK is your drive made out of? 1TB?!
Uh, that would be why you purge old backups...Ace Pace wrote:500MB every day.
500*365=182500MB
182GB per year.
Over 500GB in 3 years of operations....
Blah one LTO tape holds 400gb conpressed 500gb in three years is nothing.Ace Pace wrote:500MB every day.
500*365=182500MB
182GB per year.
Over 500GB in 3 years of operations....
Heh heh ... that would be cool, although I don't intend to buy that kind of heavy-duty backup capacity.Faram wrote:Blah one LTO tape holds 400gb conpressed 500gb in three years is nothing.Ace Pace wrote:500MB every day.
500*365=182500MB
182GB per year.
Over 500GB in 3 years of operations....
My daily server backup at work is somwhere around 1TB. And there is way more data in the SAN but we don't backup that.
I don't know if most people realize that I used to be a sysadmin. It's been a few years but I can still tear down and reassemble a computer in my sleep.Back to topic, I am inpressed that you got the site back up so fast, I thought that a dead PS would have sd.net down untill monday at the earliest. Happy to se that I am wrong
Ouch! I have to wonder how much bandwidth we use a month. It must cost a bomb compared to when we were in our infancy.Darth Wong wrote: As an aside, did you know that the daily backup file is over 500MB even with compression?
I believe the bandwidth is around 50GB per month despite the use of GZIP inline compression. That's pretty big for a site that is mostly text. This is why I self-host on a broadband connection which doesn't bill for bandwidth until it gets quite huge.Admiral Valdemar wrote:Ouch! I have to wonder how much bandwidth we use a month. It must cost a bomb compared to when we were in our infancy.Darth Wong wrote:As an aside, did you know that the daily backup file is over 500MB even with compression?
Circa 1990, when you couldn't help but be pummeled by the media's interpretation of how the information superhighway was going to revolutionise the planet, I kept thinking to myself how singularly un-impressive computers were when you pulled the plug.Darth Wong wrote:You can do a lot of things in software to make a server run with good uptimes, but there's really no way to keep it up and running if you need to move the thing around.
Board is minimally on the slow side but consistent. Archive is definitely down, though. Timeout trying to connect. What was your problem with the archive?Crown wrote:Hmm, I can't access the Archive Board at the moment, and the board alternates from 'smooth' running to 'slow as fuck'. And I have disconnected and restarted my computer. Anyone else having this problem?
Same, times out when trying to connect.Batman wrote:Board is minimally on the slow side but consistent. Archive is definitely down, though. Timeout trying to connect. What was your problem with the archive?Crown wrote:Hmm, I can't access the Archive Board at the moment, and the board alternates from 'smooth' running to 'slow as fuck'. And I have disconnected and restarted my computer. Anyone else having this problem?