
And if the CHUD reviewers managed to spot it, criticise it and still say most people won´t notice it that easily, there´s little I can do to influence public opinion anyway. It was just an observation.

Moderator: Vympel
Oh, come on, guys, you know this is the kind of plan Palpatine revels in:No you didn't write it poorly. And oh look, we just past Dr Evil stage ... it is really, really bad. Really. Seriously. Bad. Just ... wrong.
True, but the possibility is there for him to have created the means to his own destruction. Both are possible until I can see the movie and judge for myself.Look, a more rational explaination is that he's just lying through his teeth. What's to say that the Sith aren't just as aware about the prophecy as the Jedi?
VT-16 wrote:True, but the possibility is there for him to have created the means to his own destruction. Both are possible until I can see the movie and judge for myself.Look, a more rational explaination is that he's just lying through his teeth. What's to say that the Sith aren't just as aware about the prophecy as the Jedi?
What is interesting is the scene where he finds Vader after the duel, bends down and touches him, similar to Obi-Wan checking on Luke after the Sand-people attack. They say it seemed very un-Sith-like to care that much about him.
No, I meant after than duel; the fact that anyone would read anything out of that unusual or atypical for Palpatine is cretinously stupid.VT-16 wrote:Notice I said 'after the duel', as in 'when his legs and arm has been cut off and his body burnt to a crisp'. Or did you think I meant the duel with Dooku? LOL
just one question about the Playboy pics and then I stop, were they any good?Lord Revan wrote:Yeah Lucas doesn't seem that kind of a man, anyway one Lucas' daughters was in that scene and I don't think he would cut such a scene for reason that one several actors (who's isn't even in a critical role) did something that he didn't aprove.She was a senator. I don´t believe she would be cut for that reason, probably just a publicity stunt on her part (she did attend SW conventions even after the cut. Why allow that if they didn´t want her there?)
I dout it.Elfdart wrote:Are the Playboy pictures canon?
Wasn't there some first draft stuff of it or something? Palpatine also said Dooku arranged for the Tuskens to kill Shimi or something in said draft stuff, or did that turn out to be some April Fools?Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Concerning the Palpatine-father bullshit, I don't remember anything like that in the script.
Well, it´s hard to tell what´s real and what´s constructed when things seem to be presented so vague, either way, it´s Anakin´s own choices that shape his destiny, no matter how much manipulation is involved.Anakin's character is much more deep when his personality flaws prevent him from dealing with real-life tragedy that is always going to happen, and he just can't cope. This way is shitty.
Virgin birth, not immaculate conception. The latter refers to Mary being conceived without taint from the original sin. Although I highly doubt Shmi was a virgin when she conceived Anakin. I don't know what it would be called then...So...what you're all saying is, Anakin being born of immaculate conception is a MUCH better story point?