Posted: 2008-08-14 08:42pm
That doesn't mean you did great things. It just means you're dumb, and good at surviving. 

Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
That's pretty much one and the same. It's hard to tell the difference between someone who's become great because they're smart, and someone who's just fallen into it because they're dumb and lucky.Agent Fisher wrote:That doesn't mean you did great things. It just means you're dumb, and good at surviving.
There's a difference between standing up for what you believe in and doing lots of immensely stupid things because you're stubborn and cocky then refusing to learn from it.EdBecerra wrote:That's pretty much one and the same. It's hard to tell the difference between someone who's become great because they're smart, and someone who's just fallen into it because they're dumb and lucky.Agent Fisher wrote:That doesn't mean you did great things. It just means you're dumb, and good at surviving.
Me, I'm not great, but I am dumb and lucky, though Aili and Natasha might have disagreed with me on that.
Point is, though, you do what you believe to be right and moral. If doing so gets you killed, so what? Time kills us all, sooner or later. You're going to die anyway, so die with some backbone and some style.
At least the Japanese understand that...
Most of those accidents I was in, I was in them because I believed I was in the right, and I refused to budge. In some of them, I was wrong, and I paid the price for being wrong. But I still made my stand, right or wrong.
So take your stand. Doesn't matter where or what your stand is, so long as you take it out of sincerity and your best judgement at the time.
If they kill you for doing so, then they kill you. But you took your stand, unlike the majority of the human race who seem content to drift with the winds of fate.
THAT'S what I mean.
Ed.
Fighting a Stalingrad is bad anywhere, no? Doubly so if you've got the role of the Wehrmacht.Bayonet wrote:Of all the things I would not want to do, would be to fight a Stalingrad in Dis. Of course, Dagon doesn't know that.
Well, I don't particularly like Jehova's Witnesses, yet several thousand of them entered concentration camps and stayed there, when all they had to do to leave was sign one little bit of paper - a cheap loyalty oath to the Third Reich and to Hitler.R011 wrote:Your strength of character is to commended, sir. Perhaps one in a million adults and even fewer children, would be willing to volunteer for starvation, torture, and a very good chance of death, as well as the ruination of their families and their possible incarceration in a camp with you, just to get out of compulsory membership in a totalitarian government youth organization. Truly, you are quite extraordinary. I'm especially impressed that you are so sure of this that you can say this with such confidence even though there is no possibility that you will be called upon to demonstrate this willingness to endure martyrdom, as opposed to taking foolish risks for your own entertainment.
Translation of Declaration Document
Concentration camp .......................................
Department II
DECLARATION
I, the ...................................................
born on ..................................................
in .......................................................
herewith make the following declaration:
1. I have come to know that the International Bible Students Association is proclaiming erroneous teachings and under the cloak of religion follows hostile purposes against the State.
2. I therefore left the organization entirely and made myself absolutely free from the teachings of this sect.
3. I herewith give assurance that I will never again take any part in the activity of the International Bible Students Association. Any persons approaching me with the teaching of the Bible Students, or who in any manner reveal their connections with them, I will denounce immediately. All literature from the Bible Students that should be sent to my address I will at once deliver to the nearest police station.
4. I will in the future esteem the laws of the State, especially in the event of war will I, with weapon in hand, defend the fatherland, and join in every way the community of the people.
5. I have been informed that I will at once be taken again into protective custody if I should act against the declaration given today.
.................................., Dated ................
...........................................................
Signature
I'm not confusing it, I'm simply holding them to a higher standard. Admittedly, it's MY standard, but as a former 'subject' of Jesuit training, I believe I have the right to do so. Indeed, while in basic training, my drill instructors were vaguely disappointed that I didn't regard them with the same mix of terror and respect that they'd disciplined into the other recruits, and they questioned me about it.R011 wrote:I'm not sure, though, that you are perhaps confusing the Papacy with either Sainthood or a Darwin Award. The requirements are somewhat different, and a youthful desire for martyrdom or foolish danger chasing has never been a requirement for Pope. Being a former and unrepentant Nazi might be, but you have presented no evidence this was the case, nor has anyone to my knowledge.
There are likely some good criticisms of the current Catholic Church one can make, even some of the current Pope. That Ratzinger admittedly is not a near saint is not one of them.
That is not admirable. It is not even ethical. It is stupid and selfish in the extreme. These people sentenced not only themselves, but their families to imprisonment and possibly death and torture, because they refused to commit an act which itself would cause zero objective harm: saying a few empty words.EdBecerra wrote:Well, I don't particularly like Jehova's Witnesses, yet several thousand of them entered concentration camps and stayed there, when all they had to do to leave was sign one little bit of paper - a cheap loyalty oath to the Third Reich and to Hitler.
Here's a photo of it.
<snip>
That's it. That's all. Tell a little lie, sign an oath you never meant to keep, then walk out of prison a free man. Yet they didn't do it.
If the figures are accurate, over eleven thousand were placed in the camps, almost 1,500 died, and 270 were executed.
Yet they never backed down, they never backed up.
Like a wolverine, they stood their ground, even to the death.
My word is my bond, sir. It's why I so seldom give it.Darth Wong wrote:That is not admirable. It is not even ethical. It is stupid and selfish in the extreme. These people sentenced not only themselves, but their families to imprisonment and possibly death and torture, because they refused to commit an act which itself would cause zero objective harm: saying a few empty words.
To sacrifice human life on the altar of your subjective beliefs is morally unacceptable. It's morally unacceptable if it's a bunch of infidels you don't like, it's morally unacceptable if it's your family, it's morally unacceptable even if it's you.
That was my first step to really questioning my faith and god in general. Why would the all mighty and powerful creator of the universe care if people did small things like this for the greater good. How could god sentence people to eternal punishment at all?CaptainChewbacca wrote:I think God would forgive me lying to an evil man in order to save the lives of my family. I know I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
God might forgive me, but I couldn't forgive myself. Getting God to forgive you is easy. Forgiving yourself? Not so much. It's about trust. And, perhaps, about predictability.CaptainChewbacca wrote:I think God would forgive me lying to an evil man in order to save the lives of my family. I know I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
It's worth remembering that the above document is also essentially a guarantee that you will serve in Hitler's army. Incarceration of 'bible students' in concentration camps only began in 1936 (at which point compulsory military service was back, and the nation was preparing for war) and only became seriously widespread in 1939, and given that those JWs who didn't serve in the army after such declarations were, unsurprisingly, put up against the wall and shot, I'd not be surprised if a great deal of unwillingness to simply sign and leave was because signing and leaving meant signing, being issued with a gun, and sent to be crushed under the tracks of a T-34 in futile defence of the Nazism that oppresses you.EdBecerra wrote:Well, I don't particularly like Jehova's Witnesses, yet several thousand of them entered concentration camps and stayed there, when all they had to do to leave was sign one little bit of paper - a cheap loyalty oath to the Third Reich and to Hitler.
Here's a photo of it.
<snip>
That's it. That's all. Tell a little lie, sign an oath you never meant to keep, then walk out of prison a free man. Yet they didn't do it.
If the figures are accurate, over eleven thousand were placed in the camps, almost 1,500 died, and 270 were executed.
Yet they never backed down, they never backed up.
Like a wolverine, they stood their ground, even to the death.
As I said, the mark of the fanatic is that he values his beliefs above human life itself, even his own. That's true whether this fanatic is a Jehovah's Witness, a Buddhist monk, or an Al-Quaeda terrorist. The exact nature of the belief only helps determine the kind of inhumanity the person is capable of, and whether it is directed outward or inward.SiegeTank wrote:I find it rather astonishing that people would go so far as to claim that if they had been in Ratzinger's situation, they'd have refused to serve in the Hitler Jugend. Did you even contemplate the situation you'd find yourself in? You're just a kid; you've been living the majority of your life in the god-damn Third Reich; oppression and indoctrination have been a daily companion for years on end; all your friends are being conscripted in order to force back what you've been consistently told are the horridly evil commie hordes; and you'd say you'd still think the way you do now, and refuse?
That's hilarious, and I'm truly sorry, but I can't believe it for a second. It's easy to say you'll never compromise your morals now; it's not so easy to do that when you've been bombarded with propaganda for years on end and the choice is between manning an AA-gun (as Ratzinger did) or a bullet in the back of your skull. You might still not like it, but living to regret having to do it beats being dead in my opinion.
That kind of thinking is extremely unethical, which is the opposite of what I think you are hoping to achieve with it. I would suggest that you make some effort to study the concept of ethics, particularly as it has been explored numerous times by philosophers throughout history. You may find it enlightening; the ability to apply great fervour to your observance of your parents' ethics is not a particularly good substitute for the ability to rationally evaluate those ethics.EdBecerra wrote:God might forgive me, but I couldn't forgive myself. Getting God to forgive you is easy. Forgiving yourself? Not so much. It's about trust. And, perhaps, about predictability.
Sounds kind of arrogant, I know. *shrugs* That sort of grim "I'll keep my word if it kills me, I'll keep it if it kills YOU" fixation runs on my mother's side of the family, and both she and her father made certain I understood that.
OK, you've demonstrated you were an idiot. And in Hitler's Germany, you'd have been a dead idiot. <SHRUG> Don't prove nuthin' about morality or ethics.EdBecerra wrote: Let's see. Escaped from two burning houses. ...
So, yeah. I would have told the recruiter to go f*ck himself. And probably died because of that. But it would have been the right thing to do.
Some people do choose the moral choice. Not because it's the right choice, but because they're stubborn idiots. But they still made the right choice, even if by accident.
Ed.
I agree. My honor may be worth my life, but my honor isn't worth yours, Ed's, or anyone else's. The bible is generally pretty big on humility and respect of others, which many of my fellow Christians seem to forget. I'll walk to hell and back to keep my word, heck trusting in my word is the only reason Mike ever unbanned me here. But its not worth the life of someone else.Darth Wong wrote:That kind of thinking is extremely unethical, which is the opposite of what I think you are hoping to achieve with it. I would suggest that you make some effort to study the concept of ethics, particularly as it has been explored numerous times by philosophers throughout history. You may find it enlightening; the ability to apply great fervour to your observance of your parents' ethics is not a particularly good substitute for the ability to rationally evaluate those ethics.EdBecerra wrote:God might forgive me, but I couldn't forgive myself. Getting God to forgive you is easy. Forgiving yourself? Not so much. It's about trust. And, perhaps, about predictability.
Sounds kind of arrogant, I know. *shrugs* That sort of grim "I'll keep my word if it kills me, I'll keep it if it kills YOU" fixation runs on my mother's side of the family, and both she and her father made certain I understood that.
That was kinda my point. None of us know what we would have thought if we had been born under different circumstances. The basic change in perceptions voids all bets. Stuart's stories make good use of that very point, following through on misperceptions.gtg947h wrote:I just don't get all the "well, if I'd been around back then, I would have done this" I hear from people, whether the subject is Nazis, slavery, Romans, etc.
I was beginning to think I was the only one; I guess my sig was a little clue, though I don't think that merely contributing to Armageddon will be the only reason I might end up down below.CaptainChewbacca wrote:The bible is generally pretty big on humility and respect of others, which many of my fellow Christians seem to forget.
To take an oath I don't mean to a power I don't respect to save lives? I'd do it in a second.