
I don't feel like trawling 'gaming' sites full of 12yos playing with their dicks, so I guess I'll never see any PS3 wank.
Moderator: Thanas
I wasn't saying Panzer's post was being sarcastic, I was defending Xisqomelir's version.General Zod wrote:Except there's still nothing in Panzer's post to indicate that he's being sarcastic in the slightest fashion. I'm not denying that similar arguments weren't passed around, but as far as I can tell his post is completely serious.Praxis wrote:Because anyone who was around during the DS launch should remember the EXACT same arguements being passed around.
(by "he" i mean Xisiqomelir, not Panzer)
? Except I wasn't attacking Xisqomelir at all. I was simply showing other ways of abusing Panzer's post. . . .Praxis wrote:I wasn't saying Panzer's post was being sarcastic, I was defending Xisqomelir's version.General Zod wrote:Except there's still nothing in Panzer's post to indicate that he's being sarcastic in the slightest fashion. I'm not denying that similar arguments weren't passed around, but as far as I can tell his post is completely serious.Praxis wrote:Because anyone who was around during the DS launch should remember the EXACT same arguements being passed around.
(by "he" i mean Xisiqomelir, not Panzer)
I was pointing out that the DS application he made is the most accurate version, as it really doesn't apply to the XBox 360 at all.General Zod wrote:? Except I wasn't attacking Xisqomelir at all. I was simply showing other ways of abusing Panzer's post. . . .Praxis wrote:I wasn't saying Panzer's post was being sarcastic, I was defending Xisqomelir's version.General Zod wrote: Except there's still nothing in Panzer's post to indicate that he's being sarcastic in the slightest fashion. I'm not denying that similar arguments weren't passed around, but as far as I can tell his post is completely serious.