Shogoki wrote:Uraniun235 wrote:
yeah man we'll never need anything better than DVD

It's not about whether or not it's better than DVD, it's about the marginal improvements it offers, most of which your average Joe doesn't understand, care about and can't distinguish. He's also is much more likely to pick up any POS $20 DVD player which will work on any TV made in the last 20 years and which at this point is almost as good as any one from the big brands, than spend 2k's on the displays, home theater systems and players required to appreciate the difference (which most people hardly notice).
And since none of them will ever even come close to DVD outside a few rich countries, they can't pretend to kill DVD cause it will remain to be a much bigger format when you count in the rest of the world.
Whatever replaces DVD it wont be either of these.
I think that 'people won't spend $2000 on a nice "home theater" setup' is a dumb statement to make; people have been buying multi-thousand dollar big-screen TVs since the 80s, TVs which had the same crappy resolution as smaller TVs and (from what I remember of my grandfather's old big-screen, anyway) even had problems with looking really dim at the wrong viewing angle. The same sorts of people that bought those big-screens will continue to buy big-screen TVs, only now that same money will buy them a high-definition screen, and there
is a difference between 420i and 720p once you get big enough. (It doesn't even take an obscenely large television to get to that point.)
Will the next HD format completely supplant DVD? Probably not, because there's going to be millions of people content to watch movies on some shitty $90 20" TV from fifteen feet away. But to label high definition as an inherently worthless scam is disingenuous, because there
is a market for it among people who
can tell and appreciate the difference between DVD resolution and 1280x720, and that's what I was getting at in my response to
apocolypse.