Stark wrote:
It's the reason the Halo AR is laughable. At 10m the cone of fire is several meters wide, which isn't even geometrically possible. Game balance ftw?
It's even more a laugh when you realize the game takes place 500 years into the future. And Master Chief would almost be better off with a Springfield 1863 Musket than his super cool future gun.
Darth Wong wrote: If it was just dated graphics, I wouldn't have been so pissed off. But despite the dated graphics, it still required state of the art hardware (at the time) in order to run smoothly! This despite looking like ass compared to UT2003, which actually had lower hardware requirements.
Another thing about Halo PC that I found guffaw worthy. The game took a
long time to develop for the PC. WHY? It was basically the same exact game. But wait, they added a flame thrower! So that's a perfectly logical explanation as to why it took them YEARS to port the game to the PC. And as pointed out, the game didn't even function properly anyway.
Best care anywhere.
